K Number
K190618
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2019-06-06

(87 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3080
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System is an anterior cervical interbody indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiguous levels from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Devices are to be used with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation.

Device Description

The RIGEL™ Interbody Fusion System consist of implants manufactured from medical implant grade VESTAKEEP®i4R PEEK per ASTM F2026-17 with tantalum markers fabricated from medical implant grade ASTM F560-17. The Interbody Fusion Devices are offered in three footprints, various heights, and lordosis to accommodate different patient anatomy and an anterior surgical approach. The implants will be provided non-sterile and are intended for single use only.

AI/ML Overview

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on mechanical performance and design specifications, rather than AI-driven diagnostic or assistive technology. Therefore, the information requested for AI/software-based device evaluation (e.g., acceptance criteria for AI performance, clinical study details, ground truth establishment, MRMC studies, training/test set details) is not present in this document.

The document discusses:

  • Acceptance Criteria: While not explicitly listed as "acceptance criteria" in a table for performance metrics (as might be expected for an AI device), the studies performed (Static and dynamic compression, static and dynamic shear per ASTM F2077-17, and Subsidence testing per ASTM F2267-04) served as the basis for demonstrating equivalence in mechanical performance. The "acceptance criteria" here is implicitly that the device performs mechanically comparably to the predicate devices as per these ASTM standards.
  • Device Performance: The document states, "The preclinical testing listed above that was performed on the RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System indicate that it is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in mechanical performance." No specific numerical performance values are provided.

Therefore, since the device is a physical interbody fusion system and not a software/AI product, the detailed information about AI-specific acceptance criteria, study methodologies for AI performance, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, and training/test set ground truth (points 1-9 in your request) is not applicable or available in this submission.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left side of the logo is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters FDA in a blue box, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in large blue letters, and the word "ADMINISTRATION" in smaller blue letters below.

June 6, 2019

MiRus™, LLC Mr. Jordan Bauman Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality 2150 Newmarket Parkway Marietta, Georgia 30067

Re: K190618

Trade/Device Name: RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: ODP Dated: May 31, 2019 Received: June 3, 2019

Dear Mr. Bauman:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for

{1}------------------------------------------------

devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely.

for CAPT Raquel Peat, PhD, MPH, USPHS Director OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration

Indications for Use

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020

See PRA Statement below.

510(k) Number

K190618

Device Name

RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System is an anterior cervical interbody indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiguous levels from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Devices are to be used with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

� Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

FORM FDA 3881 (7/17)

blishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF

{3}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary

This 510(k) summary is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92(c).

I. SUBMITTERMiRus™, LLC2150 Newmarket Parkway SESuite 108Marietta, Georgia 30067Tel: (678)-324-6272Fax: (678) 401-5607
II. OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENTJordan BaumanDirector of Regulatory Affairs and QualityMiRus™, LLC2150 Newmarket Parkway SESuite 108Marietta, Georgia 30067Tel: (678)-324-6272Fax: (678) 401-5607
III. DATE PREPAREDMarch 8, 2019
IV. DEVICE
Name of DeviceRIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical InterbodyFusion System
Common NameIntervertebral body fusion device
Classification Name21 CFR 888.3080
Regulatory ClassClass II
Product CodesODP
Submission TypeTraditional 510(k)
V. PREDICATE DEVICECervical Interbody Fusion System - EvolutionSpine, LLC - K160324 (primary predicate)MiRus™ Lumbar Interbody Fusion System -MiRus, LLC - K182920 (additional predicate)

VI. DEVICE DESCRIPTION

The RIGEL™ Interbody Fusion System consist of implants manufactured from medical implant grade VESTAKEEP®i4R PEEK per ASTM F2026-17 with tantalum markers fabricated from medical implant grade ASTM F560-17. The Interbody Fusion Devices are offered in three footprints, various heights, and lordosis to accommodate different patient anatomy and an anterior surgical approach. The implants will be provided non-sterile and are intended for single use only.

{4}------------------------------------------------

VII. INDICATIONS FOR USE

The RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System is an anterior cervical interbody indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiguous levels from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of nonoperative treatment. Devices are to be used with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation.

VIII. PREDICATE DEVICE COMPARISON

The documentation provided shows that the RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in intended use, indications for use, materials, technological characteristics and labeling.

IX. PERFORMANCE DATA

Static and dynamic compression and static and dynamic shear were performed adhering to ASTM F2077-17. Subsidence testing was performed adhering to ASTM F2267-04. The preclinical testing listed above that was performed on the RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System indicate that it is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in mechanical performance.

X. CONCLUSONS

The RIGEL™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System does not raise any new questions of safety or efficacy when compared to the predicate device(s). The RIGEL ™ PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System has demonstrated that it is substantially equivalent in mechanically performance, indications for used, intended use, technological characteristics, materials and labeling to legally marketed predicate devices.

§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.

(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.