(27 days)
The Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is indicated for use with compatible catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of catheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
The modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is a single-lumen, variable stiffness, hydrophilically coated catheter with a flexible tapered tip. The tapered tip is delineated by two radiopaque markers. On the proximal end is a luer hub for guidewire introduction and fluid or contrast injection. The devices are provided sterile and non-pyrogenic and are intended for single use only. During use, a standard neurovascular guidewire may be inserted through the Delivery Catheter. The Delivery Catheter is inserted through a compatible catheter. The Delivery Catheter and compatible catheter are advanced to the targeted location under fluoroscopy using standard endovascular techniques.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter. It describes the device, its intended use, and the performance testing conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
Here's the breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state the quantitative acceptance criteria for each test. Instead, it generally states "All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria" under the "Results" column. The "Test Method" column describes how the device was tested, implying the criteria are inherent to or defined by these methods.
| Test | Test Method | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Package Integrity after Aging and Distribution | The test specimens were subjected to EO sterilization and environmental conditioning, mechanical transit challenges, visual inspection and bubble leak test and peel test per ASTM F2096 and ASTM F88. | PASS |
| Label Integrity after Aging and Distribution | The test specimens were subjected to EO sterilization and climatic conditioning per ASTM D4169. | PASS |
| Tensile Strength | The tensile strength of the catheter sections and bonds was tested. | PASS |
| Kink Resistance | Test specimen segments were formed into a defined bend diameter to evaluate kink resistance. | PASS |
| Torsion Resistance | The test specimens were rotated to evaluate integrity after rotation. | PASS |
| Tip Flexibility | Test specimens were tested for tip flexibility. | PASS |
| Air Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 Annex D. | PASS |
| Liquid Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 Annex C. | PASS |
| Hydrophilic Coating Integrity | The integrity of the hydrophilic coating was evaluated after multiple insertion and withdrawal cycles. | PASS |
| Particulate Recovery | After multiple insertion and withdrawal cycles, the effluent water rinsed and flushed from the devices and model was tested per USP <788>. | PASS |
| Catheter Burst Pressure (Static & Dynamic) | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 Annex F. | PASS |
| Catheter Flow Rate | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 Annex E. | PASS |
| Simulated Use Testing | Deliverability and compatibility with accessory devices was evaluated in a neurovascular model. | PASS |
| Packaging Integrity (ISO 11607-1 Part 1 & Part 2) | ISO 11607-1 Part 1 and ISO 11607-2 Part 2. (Note: The table lists "Packaging Integrity" twice, once with a detailed method and once with "ISO 11607-1 Part 1" and "ISO 11607-2 Part 2". It's likely the first entry is a summary and the latter specifies the standards used.) | All samples met the pre-determined acceptance criteria |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify the sample size used for any of the performance tests. It refers to "test specimens" and "samples" but no quantities.
The data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not mentioned. These are bench tests, so patient data provenance is not applicable.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This information is not applicable as the document describes bench performance testing of a medical device (catheter), not a diagnostic device involving expert interpretation or ground truth establishment in a clinical sense. The "ground truth" for these tests would be the fulfillment of engineering specifications and standards.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not applicable for the type of bench testing described. Adjudication methods are typically used in clinical studies where expert consensus is needed to establish a ground truth for diagnostic or interpretative tasks.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
An MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This document describes bench testing for a physical medical device (catheter), not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool or an imaging product that would involve human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This is not applicable. The device is a physical catheter, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
For this type of device and testing, the "ground truth" refers to engineering specifications, established industry standards (e.g., ASTM, ISO), and the performance characteristics of the predicate device. The tests demonstrate that the device meets these pre-defined physical and functional requirements. It is a comparison against established benchmarks for mechanical and material integrity.
8. The sample size for the training set
This is not applicable as the document describes a physical medical device and its bench testing, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This is not applicable for the same reasons as item 8.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
March 21, 2019
Route 92 Medical Inc. Kathy Tansev Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance 1700 South El Camino Real, Suite 206 San Mateo, California 94402
Re: K190431
Trade/Device Name: Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DOY Dated: February 20, 2019 Received: February 22, 2019
Dear Kathy Tansey:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by
Xiaolin Zheng -S
Lin Zheng Date: 2019.03.21
14:57:10-04'00'
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K190431
Device Name Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is indicated for use with compatible catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of catheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| × Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K190431 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Summary | |
|---|---|
| Sponsor: | Route 92 Medical1700 S. El Camino Real, Suite 206San Mateo, CA 94022Phone: 408-391-6536Fax: 650-343-5827 |
| Contact: | Kathy Tansey |
| Date Prepared: | March 18, 2019 |
| Device Name: | Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter |
| Common Name: | Percutaneous Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Percutaneous Catheter (Product Code DQY, 21 CFR870.1250) |
| Legally Marketed Predicate Device: | Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter (K182512) |
Device Description
The modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is a single-lumen, variable stiffness, hydrophilically coated catheter with a flexible tapered tip. The tapered tip is delineated by two radiopaque markers. On the proximal end is a luer hub for guidewire introduction and fluid or contrast injection. The devices are provided sterile and non-pyrogenic and are intended for single use only. During use, a standard neurovascular guidewire may be inserted through the Delivery Catheter. The Delivery Catheter is inserted through a compatible catheter. The Delivery Catheter and compatible catheter are advanced to the targeted location under fluoroscopy using standard endovascular techniques.
Indications for Use
The Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is indicated for use with compatible catheters in facilitating the insertion and guidance of catheters into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system.
Comparison to Predicate Device
The method of action, design, and materials of the modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter are equivalent to the cleared Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter as shown in the following table.
| Attribute | Cleared Route 92 Medical DeliveryCatheter (K182512) | Modified Route 92 MedicalDelivery Catheter |
|---|---|---|
| Indications forUse | The Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheteris indicated for use with compatiblecatheters in facilitating the insertion and | Same as cleared device |
| Attribute | Cleared Route 92 Medical DeliveryCatheter (K182512) | Modified Route 92 MedicalDelivery Catheter |
| DeviceDescription | The Delivery Catheter is a sterile, single-use, single-lumen, hydrophilicallycoated, variable stiffness catheter with aflexible, tapered tip. | Same as cleared device |
| User | Physicians trained in neurovascularinterventional techniques | Same as cleared device |
| Anatomical Sites | Neurovasculature only | Same as cleared device |
| Materials | Biocompatible polymers and metalscommonly used in the manufacture ofmedical devicesCatheter Shaft: stainless steel andvarying durometers of PebaxLuer: polycarbonateMarker bands: Tungsten/Pebax | Same as cleared device |
| Coating | Hydrophilic coating | Same as cleared device |
| Inner Diameter | 0.019" | Same as cleared device |
| Outer Diameter | 0.062" | Same as cleared device |
| Working Length | 143 cm | 151 cm |
| Length of PolymerSection (non-hypotube section) | 38 cm | 71 cm |
| HydrophilicCoating Length | 48.5 cm | 90 cm |
| Steam ShapeableTip | Not discussed in labeling | Steam shaping added to labeling |
| Packaging | The shelf carton contains two (2) sterilepouches, each containing a DeliveryCatheter and one (1) Directions for Use(DFU). | The shelf carton contains one (1)sterile pouch containing a DeliveryCatheter and one (1) Directions forUse (DFU). |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Same as cleared device |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Performance Testing – Bench
The successful completion of the performance testing listed in the following table demonstrates that the modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is suitable for its intended use.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Test | Test Method | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Package Integrityafter Aging andDistribution | The test specimens were subjected toEO sterilization and environmentalconditioning, mechanical transitchallenges, visual inspection andbubble leak test and peel test perASTM F2096 and ASTM F88. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Label Integrityafter Aging andDistribution | The test specimens were subjected toEO sterilization and climaticconditioning per ASTM D4169. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Tensile Strength | The tensile strength of the cathetersections and bonds was tested | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Kink Resistance | Test specimen segments were formedinto a defined bend diameter toevaluate kink resistance | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| TorsionResistance | The test specimens were rotated toevaluate integrity after rotation | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Tip Flexibility | Test specimens were tested for tipflexibility | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Air Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 AnnexD. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Liquid Leakage | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 AnnexC. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| HydrophilicCoating Integrity | The integrity of the hydrophilic coatingwas evaluated after multiple insertionand withdrawal cycles. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| ParticulateRecovery | After multiple insertion andwithdrawal cycles, the effluent waterrinsed and flushed from the devicesand model was tested per USP <788>. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Catheter BurstPressure (Static& Dynamic) | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 AnnexF. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Catheter FlowRate | Tested per ISO 10555-1:2013 AnnexE. | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Simulated UseTesting | Deliverability and compatibility withaccessory devices was evaluated in aneurovascular model | PASSAll samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
| Test | Test Method | Results |
| PackagingIntegrity | ISO 11607-1 Part 1 | PASS |
| ISO 11607-2 Part 2 | All samples met the pre-determinedacceptance criteria |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility evaluations were not conducted using the modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter because the materials of construction and manufacturing processes have not changed from the predicate device. Therefore, the biocompatibility evaluations performed using the predicate Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter (K182512) can also support the biocompatibility profile of the subject device.
Substantial Equivalence
The modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter has the same intended use, similar technological characteristics and same method of action as the predicate Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter (K182512). The successful completion of performance testing demonstrates that the modified Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate Route 92 Medical Delivery Catheter.
§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.
(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).