(103 days)
Not Found
No
The device description focuses on the physical construction and materials of the catheter, and the performance studies are non-clinical bench tests. There is no mention of AI, ML, or any software-based analysis or processing of data that would typically involve these technologies.
No.
The device is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices, not for providing a therapeutic effect itself.
No
The device is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices, rather than for the purpose of diagnosis.
No
The device description clearly outlines a physical catheter with various material components, a marker band, and a coating, indicating it is a hardware device, not software-only.
Based on the provided information, the React™ 71 Catheter is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for the "introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature." This describes a device used within the body for a therapeutic or interventional procedure, not for testing samples outside the body to diagnose a condition.
- Device Description: The description details a catheter designed for insertion into blood vessels, with features like variable stiffness, a radiopaque marker for visualization under fluoroscopy, and a lubricious coating. These are characteristics of an invasive medical device used in vivo.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of the device being used to analyze biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.) or to provide diagnostic information based on such analysis.
IVD devices are specifically designed to perform tests on samples taken from the human body to provide information for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of diseases or conditions. The React™ 71 Catheter's function is purely mechanical and procedural within the body.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The React™ 71 Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
Product codes
DQY
Device Description
The React™ 71 Catheter is a single lumen, flexible, variable stiffness composite catheter with a nitinol structure that is jacketed with various durable polymer outer layers. A lubricious, polytetrafluoroethylene liner and Engage™ inner layer is used to create a structure that has both proximal stiffness and distal flexibility. The React™ 71 Catheter is also designed with an encapsulated radiopaque distal platinum-iridium marker band which is used for visualization under fluoroscopy. The React™ 71 Catheter is introduced into the vasculature through the Split-Y Introducer Sheath. The proximal end of the React™ 71 Catheter is designed with a green thermoplastic elastomer strain relief and a clear hub. The distal end of the React™ 71 Catheter is coated with a Surmodics Serene™ Coating.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
peripheral and neuro vasculature
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Biocompatibility:
- Cytotoxicity (Elution Method): The test article extract showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity and had a Grade 0 (No Reactivity). The ReactTM 71 Catheter is considered non-cytotoxic.
- Sensitization (Guinea Pig Maximization Test): The test article extracts showed no evidence of causing delayed dermal contact sensitization in the guinea pig. The ReactTM 71 Catheter does not elicit a sensitization response.
- Irritation (Intracutaneous Reactivity): The test article met the requirements of the test. The ReactTM 71 Catheter is considered a non-irritant.
- Acute Systemic Toxicity (Systemic Toxicity): There was no mortality or evidence of systemic toxicity from the extracts injected into mice. The ReactTM 71 Catheter does not indicate signs of toxicity.
- Hemocompatibility (Hemolysis): The hemolytic index for the test article in direct contact with blood was 0.8%, and for the extract was 0.0%. The ReactTM 71 Catheter is considered non-hemolytic.
- Hemocompatibility (Complement Activation): The concentration of SC5b-9 in the test article was not statistically higher than controls. The ReactTM 71 Catheter is not considered to be a potential activator of the complement system.
- Hemocompatibility (Thrombogenicity – Canine Model): The test article had a mean score of 1.7 after four hours compared to a control article mean score of 2.0. The ReactTM 71 Catheter demonstrates lower thrombogenic potential in arterial vessels compared to the ACE 68 Reperfusion Catheter.
- Pyrogenicity (Material Mediated): No animal showed a temperature rise of 0.5°C or more. The ReactTM 71 Catheter is considered non-pyrogenic.
Performance Data – Bench (Leveraged testing):
- Microbial:
- Ethylene Oxide Residual: Met acceptance criteria.
- Ethylene Chlorohydrin Residual: Met acceptance criteria.
- Bioburden Recovery: Met acceptance criteria.
- Bacterial Endotoxin: Met acceptance criteria.
- Packaging:
- Visual Inspection: Met acceptance criteria.
- Bubble Leak: Met acceptance criteria.
- Seal Strength: Met acceptance criteria.
Performance Data – Bench (Conducted testing):
- Microbial:
- Bioburden: Met acceptance criteria.
- Performance:
- Visual Inspection: Met acceptance criteria.
- Dimensional Measurements: Met acceptance criteria.
- Tip Buckling: Met acceptance criteria.
- Kink Resistance: Met acceptance criteria.
- Particulate: Met acceptance criteria.
- Coating Lubricity: Met acceptance criteria.
- Tensile Strength: Met acceptance criteria for the hub and shaft.
- Liquid Leak: Met acceptance criteria.
- Corrosion Resistance: Met acceptance criteria.
- Hub Aspiration Resistance: Met acceptance criteria.
- Radiopacity: Met acceptance criteria.
- Luer Standards: Met acceptance criteria.
- Compatibility: Met acceptance criteria for delivering and retrieving interventional devices.
- Torque to Failure: Was able to withstand torsional forces typical of clinical use.
- Dynamic Pressure: Was able to withstand pressures typical of clinical use.
- Coating Integrity: Remained coated and lubricious.
- Usability: Met acceptance criteria for maneuverability and flexibility.
Performance Data – Animal: Not Applicable. A determination of substantial equivalence is based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing as there is no change to the intended use or fundamental scientific technology.
Performance Data – Clinical: Not Applicable. A determination of substantial equivalence is based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing as there is no change to the intended use or fundamental scientific technology.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.
(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 14, 2018
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular Ryan Kenney Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 9775 Toledo Way Irvine, California 92618
Re: K182097
Trade/Device Name: React™ 71 Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQY Dated: October 12, 2018 Received: October 15, 2018
Dear Ryan Kenney:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
1
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Xiaolin Zheng -S
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K182097
Device Name React™ 71 Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The React™ 71 Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary: K182097
| 510(k) Owner: | Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular
9775 Toledo Way
Irvine, CA 92618
Establishment Registration No.: 2029214 | |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Contact Person: | Ryan Kenney
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Telephone: (949) 297-5489
Email: ryan.j.kenney@medtronic.com | |
| Date Summary Prepared: | October 12, 2018 | |
| Trade Name of Device: | React™ 71 Catheter | |
| Common Name of Device: | Percutaneous Catheter | |
| Review Panel: | Neurology | |
| Product Code: | DQY | |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.1250 | |
| Regulation Name: | Percutaneous Catheter | |
| Device Classification: | Class II | |
| Primary Predicate Device: | AXS Catalyst™ Distal Access Catheter
510(k)#: K151667 | |
| Additional Predicate Devices: | ReFlex™ Guide Catheter
510(k)#: K110055
React™ 68 Catheter
510(k)#: K180715 | |
Device Description:
The React™ 71 Catheter is a single lumen, flexible, variable stiffness composite catheter with a nitinol structure that is jacketed with various durable polymer outer layers. A lubricious, polytetrafluoroethylene liner and Engage™ inner layer is used to create a structure that has both proximal stiffness and distal flexibility. The React™ 71 Catheter is also designed with an encapsulated radiopaque distal platinum-iridium marker band which is used for visualization under fluoroscopy. The React™ 71 Catheter is introduced into the vasculature through the Split-Y Introducer Sheath. The proximal end of the React™ 71 Catheter is designed with a green thermoplastic elastomer strain relief and a clear hub. The distal end of the React™ 71 Catheter is coated with a Surmodics Serene™ Coating.
Indications for Use:
The React™ 71 Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
4
Device Comparison: | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
AXS Catalyst™ Distal | ||||
Access Catheter | ||||
(K151667) | ReFlex™ Guide | |||
Catheter | ||||
(K110055) | React™ 68 Catheter | |||
(K180715) | React™ 71 Catheter | |||
(K182097) | ||||
Indication for Use | ||||
(IFU) Statement | The AXS Catalyst™ | |||
Distal Access Catheter | ||||
is indicated for the | ||||
insertion and guidance | ||||
of appropriately sized | ||||
interventional devices | ||||
into a selected blood | ||||
vessel in the | ||||
peripheral and | ||||
neurovascular | ||||
systems. The AXS | ||||
Catalyst™ Distal | ||||
Access Catheter is | ||||
also indicated for use | ||||
as a conduit for | ||||
retrieval devices. | The ReFlex™ Guide | |||
Catheter is indicated | ||||
for the introduction | ||||
of interventional | ||||
devices into the | ||||
peripheral and neuro | ||||
vasculature. | The React™ 68 | |||
Catheter is indicated | ||||
for the introduction | ||||
of interventional | ||||
devices into the | ||||
peripheral and neuro | ||||
vasculature. | The React™ 71 | |||
Catheter is indicated | ||||
for the introduction | ||||
of interventional | ||||
devices into the | ||||
peripheral and neuro | ||||
vasculature. | ||||
Materials | ||||
Hub | Nylon | Trogamid® | Same as K110055 | Same as K110055 |
Strain Relief | Thermoplastic Rubber | Santoprene™ | DynaFlex® | Same as K182097 |
Inner Layer | PTFE | Same as K151667 | Same as K151667 | PTFE, |
Polyolefin | ||||
Reinforcement | Stainless Steel with | |||
Nitinol and Polymer | ||||
Fiber | Nitinol | Same as K110055 | Same as K110055 | |
Outer Jacket | Pebax® | Polymeric | Grilamid™ | |
Pebax® | Polyamide, | |||
Polyolefin, | ||||
Polyurethane | ||||
Marker Band | Platinum/ | |||
Iridium | Same | Same | Same | |
AXS Catalyst™ Distal | ||||
Access Catheter | ||||
(K151667) | ReFlex™ Guide | |||
Catheter | ||||
(K110055) | React™ 68 Catheter | |||
(K180715) | React™ 71 Catheter | |||
(K182097) | ||||
Adhesive | Cyanoacrylate | Same | Same | Same |
Coating | Hydrophilic | Same | Same | Same |
Dimensions | ||||
Working Length | 132 cm | 130 cm | Same as K151667 | Same as K151667 |
Inner Diameter | 0.060" | 0.072" | 0.068" | 0.071" |
Proximal Outer | ||||
Diameter (OD) | 0.079" | 0.084" | 0.083" | 0.0855" (Max) |
Distal OD | 0.071" | 0.084" | 0.083" | 0.0855" (Max) |
Packaged Accessories | ||||
Peelable Sheath | Yes | Same | Same | Same |
Rotating Hemostasis | ||||
Valve | Yes | No | Same as K110055 | Same as K110055 |
Packaging | ||||
Packaging Card | Polyethylene | Same | Same | Same |
Packaging Hoop | Polyethylene | Same | Same | Same |
Other | ||||
Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide (EO) | Same | Same | Same |
Device Comparison:
5
6
Biocompatibility:
Biocompatibility was conducted for the React™ 71 Catheter. The React™ 71 Catheter is categorized as a limited exposure (. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for bacterial endotoxin. |
| Packaging | | |
| Visual Inspection | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ASTM F1886. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for visual inspection. |
| Bubble Leak | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ASTM F2096. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for bubble leak. |
| Seal Strength | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ASTM F88. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for seal strength. |
The following non-clinical bench testing was conducted for the React™ 71 Catheter:
Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
---|---|---|
Microbial | ||
Bioburden | The ReactTM 71 Catheter was | |
evaluated per ISO 11737-1. | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for | ||
bioburden. | ||
Performance | ||
Visual Inspection | The ReactTM 71 Catheter was | |
inspected under x2.5 | ||
magnification. | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for | ||
visual inspection. | ||
Dimensional Measurements | The proximal ID, distal ID, | |
proximal OD, distal OD, usable | ||
length, total length, coating | ||
length, and distal tip length of | ||
the ReactTM 71 Catheter were | ||
measured. | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for | ||
dimensional measurements. | ||
Tip Buckling | The ReactTM 71 Catheter was | |
evaluated for the maximum | ||
compressive force it can | ||
withstand. | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for tip | ||
buckling. | ||
Kink Resistance | The ReactTM 71 Catheter was | |
evaluated for the maximum | ||
kink diameter. | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for kink | ||
resistance. | ||
Particulate | The ReactTM 71 Catheter was | |
evaluated per USP . | The ReactTM 71 Catheter met | |
the acceptance criteria for | ||
particulate. | ||
Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
Coating Lubricity | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated for the average frictional forces. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for coating lubricity. |
Tensile Strength | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ISO 10555-1. Annex B. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for tensile strength at the hub and shaft. |
Liquid Leak | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ISO 10555-1. Annex C. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for liquid leak. |
Corrosion Resistance | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ISO 10555-1. Annex A. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for corrosion resistance. |
Hub Aspiration Resistance | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ISO 10555-1. Annex D. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for hub air aspiration. |
Radiopacity | The markerband length and wall thickness of the React™ 71 Catheter were measured. In addition, radiopacity was confirmed via fluoroscopy. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for radiopacity. |
Luer Standards | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated per ISO 594-1 and ISO 80369-7. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for luer standards. |
Compatibility | The React™ 71 Catheter was inspected for visual damage of the catheter when delivering and retrieving interventional devices. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for delivering and retrieving interventional devices. |
Torque to Failure | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated for transmission of proximal torque to the distal tip. | The React™ 71 Catheter was able to withstand torsional forces that are typical of clinical use. |
Dynamic Pressure | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated for the amount of pressure it can withstand. | The React™ 71 Catheter was able to withstand pressures that are typical of clinical use. |
Coating Integrity | The React™ 71 Catheter was evaluated for coating coverage and lubricity. | The React™ 71 Catheter remained coated and lubricious. |
Usability | The React™ 71 Catheter and predicate device were evaluated for maneuverability and flexibility. | The React™ 71 Catheter met the acceptance criteria for usability. |
9
10
Performance Data - Animal:
Not Applicable. A determination of substantial equivalence is based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing as there is no change to the intended use or fundamental scientific technology.
Performance Data - Clinical:
Not Applicable. A determination of substantial equivalence is based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing as there is no change to the intended use or fundamental scientific technology.
Conclusion:
The design modifications incorporated do not alter the intended use or fundamental scientific technology.
Non-clinical bench testing supports a determination that the subject React™ 71 Catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.