K Number
K180464
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2018-05-31

(99 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3040
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Aevumed PHANTOM™ suture anchors are intended to be used for suture and/or soft tissue fixation to bone in the shoulder, foot/ankle, knee, hand/wrist, and elbow in, but not limited to, the following procedures:
· Shoulder: Rotator Cuff Repair, SLAP Lesion Repair, Biceps Tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular Separation Repair, Deltoid Repair, Capsular Shift or Capsulolabral Reconstruction.
· Foot/Ankle: Lateral Stabilization, Medial Stabilization, Achilles Tendon Repair, Hallux Valgus Reconstruction, Midfoot Reconstruction, Metatarsal Ligament Repair.
· Knee: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair, Medial Collateral Ligament Repair, Lateral Ligament Repair, Patellar Tendon Repair, Posterior Oblique Ligament Repair and Illiotibial Band Tenodesis.
• Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction, Ulnar or Radial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
· Elbow: Biceps Tendon Reattachment, Ulnar or Radial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Device Description

The Aevumed PHANTOM ™ Anchor with HS Fiber ™ suture is a threaded suture anchor manufactured from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material preloaded on a disposable driver assembly intended for fixation of soft tissue to bone. The Aevumed PHANTOM ™ Anchor with HS Fiber ™ are pre-loaded with or without needles. The Aevumed PHANTOM ™ Suture Anchor are available in diameter sizes: 5.5mm and 6.5mm. They are offered sterile and are for single use only.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a medical device (AEVUMED PHANTOM Suture Anchors). This document describes the device, its intended use, and a comparison to a predicate device to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

However, the provided text DOES NOT contain information about acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria in the context of AI/ML-based medical devices. The document is for a traditional mechanical medical device (suture anchors) and the "NON-CLINICAL TESTS" section only mentions mechanical testing (Torsional Strength, Driving Torque, Pullout Strength) as the basis for substantial equivalence.

Therefore, I cannot extract the information required by your request, as the request pertains to the evaluation of an AI/ML device, and the provided document describes a non-AI/ML device.

Here's what I can tell you from the document regarding the "study" that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria, even though it's not an AI/ML study:

  • Study Type: Non-clinical mechanical testing.
  • Tests Conducted: Torsional Strength, Driving Torque, and Pullout Strength.
  • Purpose: To demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device (Arthrex Corkscrew FT) by showing comparable mechanical performance.
  • Ground Truth: The mechanical properties of the predicate device serve as the de facto "ground truth" for comparison.
  • Acceptance Criteria: While specific numerical acceptance criteria are not explicitly listed in this summary, the implication is that the Aevumed PHANTOM™ Suture Anchors must perform comparably to the predicate device in these mechanical tests to establish substantial equivalence.

To directly answer your numbered points based on the provided text, I must state that this information is not available for an AI/ML device study:

  1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not applicable for an AI/ML study. The document mentions mechanical tests (Torsional Strength, Driving Torque, Pullout Strength), but doesn't provide a table of acceptance criteria or specific numerical performance results for these non-clinical tests. It only states they were tested.
  2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable for an AI/ML study. For the mechanical tests, the sample sizes and provenance of the test articles are not specified in this summary.
  3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable for an AI/ML study. Ground truth for mechanical testing is based on physical measurements, not expert consensus.
  4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for an AI/ML study.
  5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI/ML device.
  6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a mechanical device.
  7. The type of ground truth used: For this mechanical device, the "ground truth" is likely defined by the established mechanical standards and performance of the predicate device.
  8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. There is no AI/ML training set.
  9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. There is no AI/ML training set.

§ 888.3040 Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener.

(a)
Identification. A smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a stiff wire segment or rod made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel, and that may be smooth on the outside, fully or partially threaded, straight or U-shaped; and may be either blunt pointed, sharp pointed, or have a formed, slotted head on the end. It may be used for fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, as a guide pin for insertion of other implants, or it may be implanted through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.