(242 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes a physical implant device made of PEEK for spinal fusion, with no mention of software, algorithms, or AI/ML capabilities.
Yes
The device is described as an "intervertebral body fusion device" used for "spinal fusion procedures" to treat conditions like "cervical disc disease" and "degenerative disc disease", which are therapeutic aims.
No
The device description indicates it is an implant designed for spinal fusion procedures, specifically intervertebral body fusion (IBF). Its function is to facilitate fusion, not to diagnose a condition. The "radiographic studies" mentioned are used to confirm disc degeneration for treatment, not as part of the device's diagnostic function.
No
The device description clearly states the device is an implant manufactured from medical grade PEEK and includes physical components like tantalum beads or pins and machined teeth. This indicates it is a physical medical device, not software-only.
Based on the provided text, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections.
- Device description: The Zavation IBF implants are physical implants made of PEEK, designed to be surgically inserted into the spine for fusion procedures.
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly describes a surgical procedure involving the implantation of a device, not a diagnostic test performed on a sample.
- Lack of IVD characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, detecting biomarkers, or providing diagnostic information based on laboratory testing.
The device is a surgical implant used in the treatment of spinal conditions, not a diagnostic tool.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.
For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Pedicle Screw System and Zavation Cervical Plate System.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
MAX, ODP
Device Description
The Zavation IBF implants offers a variety of heights, widths and lengths. There are six main configurations: ALIF, LLIF, TLIF, T-PLIF, PLIF and CIF. The different configurations allow for multiple surgical technique options. The implants are manufactured from medical grade PEEK (Polyetheretherketone).
The Zavation IBF implants are available in a range of sizes, as well as parallel and lordotic angled implants, to accommodate variations in patients' anatomy. In addition, tantalum beads or pins are embedded in the implants as an option to help allow for radiographic visualization. The ends of the implants have machined teeth which are designed to engage with the vertebral body end plates.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
cervical spine, from C2 to T1; lumbar spine, from L2 to S1
Indicated Patient Age Range
skeletally mature patients
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Mechanical test results demonstrated that the Zavation IBF System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Testing was performed in accordance with:
- ASTM F2077, Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices
- Static Axial Compression
- Dynamic Axial Compression
- Static Torsion (for cervical)
- Dynamic Torsion (for cervical)
Testing per ISO 10993 was completed to demonstrate biocompatibility.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal features the department's name arranged in a circular pattern around a stylized emblem. The emblem consists of a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare, with three intertwined snakes and a staff.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 4, 2017
Zavation, LLC Lawrence Walker Engineering Manager 220 Lakeland Pkwy Flowood, Mississippi 39232
Re: K162206
Trade/Device Name: Zavation IBF System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP Dated: March 2, 2017 Received: March 3, 2017
Dear Mr. Walker:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
K162206 510(k) Number:
Device Name: Zavation IBF System
Indications For Use:
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.
For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Pedicle Screw System and Zavation Cervical Plate System.
Prescription Use X______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
(21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
3
510K Summary
| Date: | April 4, 2017 |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | Zavation LLC |
| 220 Lakeland Pkwy | |
| Flowood, MS 39232 | |
| Phone: 601-919-1119 | |
| Fax: 800-447-1302 | |
| Contact person: | Lawrence Walker |
| Type of 510(k) submission: | Traditional |
| Trade name: | Zavation IBF System |
| Common name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device |
| Classification regulation: | 888.3080 (MAX, ODP) |
| Device classification: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | Orthopedic |
| Product code: | MAX, ODP |
Device Description:
The Zavation IBF implants offers a variety of heights, widths and lengths. There are six main configurations: ALIF, LLIF, TLIF, T-PLIF, PLIF and CIF. The different configurations allow for multiple surgical technique options. The implants are manufactured from medical grade PEEK (Polyetheretherketone).
The Zavation IBF implants are available in a range of sizes, as well as parallel and lordotic angled implants, to accommodate variations in patients' anatomy. In addition, tantalum beads or pins are embedded in the implants as an option to help allow for radiographic visualization. The ends of the implants have machined teeth which are designed to engage with the vertebral body end plates.
Purpose of 510K:
Addition of new supplier for raw material.
Intended Use:
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature
4
patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.
For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Spinal System and Zavation Cervical Plate System.
Materials:
The devices are manufactured from medical grade PEEK Zeniva ZA-500 or Superior Polymers Magnolia PEEK(ASTM F2026) with Tantalum alloy position markers (ASTM F560).
Predicate Device:
Primary -Zavation IBF System, Zavation LLC (K120576) Additional -LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (K091088) Additional -SeaSpine Inc, SeaSpine Spacer System (K082310)
Technological Characteristics:
The Zavation IBF System possesses the same technological characteristics as the predicates. These include similar heights, widths, lengths, and intended use.
Performance Data:
Mechanical test results demonstrated that the Zavation IBF System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Testing was performed in accordance with:
- 0 ASTM F2077, Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices
- Static Axial Compression O
- Dynamic Axial Compression O
- Static Torsion (for cervical) O
- Dynamic Torsion (for cervical) O
Testing per ISO 10993 was completed to demonstrate biocompatibility.
Basis for Substantial Equivalence:
The Zavation IBF devices are similar to the predicate systems with respect to technical characteristics, performance and intended use. The information provided within this premarket notification supports substantial equivalence of the subject spacers to the predicate devices.