(15 days)
Intended for the application of two non-homogenous liquids.
The Laparoscopic (Lap) Spray Applicators with Spinning Luers are sterile, single-use, disposable devices that are designed to mix two non-homogeneous liquids and to allow the resulting mixture to be applied by spraying on potentially difficult to reach treatment sites subcutaneously or within the body through a trocar.
The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers consists of a lap spray applicator and a filter/tubing assembly (also called the tubing set). The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers has the following functional parts:
- . Proximal hub (Y-connection) with spinning luers to connect to dual syringes (not provided) and an attachment point for the filter/tubing to the gas regulator (provided separately)
- Stainless steel shaft connecting hub to Pebax ●
- Flexible Pebax portion connecting stainless steel shaft to distal tip
- Fixed-position distal tip. ●
Lap Spray Applicator components are made from the following materials: White or Blue Polypropylene, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS - regular/non-radiopaque), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) with 20% barium (radiopaque), Stainless Steel, White Nylon, Light Blue Pebax, Epoxy Adhesive. Tubing Set components are made from the following materials: Clear Medical PVC. Natural Nylon, Stainless Steel Wire Mesh, Clear Polycarbonate, Blue Nylon or Red Nylon, Clear Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Clear Acrylic, Versapor Filter Media.
The device is packaged in a thermoformed tray with a tray (Tyvek) lid. Five (5) trays are then put into a shelf box and then a cardboard shipper box. Like the device from K122526, the Lap Spray Applicators with Spinning Luers are sterilized using ethylene oxide.
This document describes the Laparoscopic Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It explicitly states that no clinical performance data was provided as a basis for substantial equivalence. Therefore, the device relies on non-clinical performance data to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.
Here's an analysis of the provided information based on your requested criteria:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document lists various tests performed and states that the "test articles met the pre-defined acceptance criteria." However, it does not provide the specific numerical acceptance criteria for each test nor the quantitative results of the device's performance. It only states that the device "met the pre-defined acceptance criteria."
| Test Performed | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Inspection | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Particulate Matter | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Dimensional Verification Test | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Leak Test | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Spray Test | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Pebax/Tip Bond Strength | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Pebax/Shaft Bond Strength | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Hub/Shaft Pull Strength | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Hub/Shaft Torque Strength | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Spinning Luer Actuation Torque | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Spinning Luer Side Load | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Spinning Luer Pull Strength | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| ISO 594-1 and -2 (Luer Gauge, Luer Leak, | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Luer Separation, Luer Ease of Assembly, | ||
| Luer Override, and Luer Stress Cracking) | ||
| Sterilization | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Shelf life | Not specified (pre-defined criteria met) | Met pre-defined acceptance criteria |
| Biocompatibility (ISO 10993 Part 1) | Considered safe for intended biocontact (ISO 10993-1) | Device is considered safe for use for its intended biocontact |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify the sample size used for any of the non-clinical tests. The data provenance is also not explicitly stated, but since it's an FDA submission for a device manufactured by Micromedics Inc. (d/b/a Nordson Medical) in St. Paul, Minnesota, it can be inferred that the testing likely occurred in the US and was prospective for the purpose of this submission.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This question is not applicable as the study did not involve human interpretation or subjective assessment that would require external experts to establish a "ground truth" in the traditional sense (e.g., for image analysis). The ground truth was established through adherence to engineering specifications and international standards for device performance.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This question is not applicable as the non-clinical testing for this device did not involve subjective human assessment requiring adjudication. The results were based on objective measurements against pre-defined engineering and performance criteria.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This device is a laparoscopic spray applicator, not an AI or diagnostic imaging device that would involve human readers or AI assistance in interpretation.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This question is not applicable. This device is a physical medical device, not a software algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
For the non-clinical performance tests, the "ground truth" was based on pre-defined engineering specifications, design requirements, and adherence to relevant international standards (e.g., ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, ISO 594-1 and -2 for luer connections). It was not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data, as these are typically associated with clinical studies or diagnostic evaluations.
8. The sample size for the training set
This question is not applicable. There was no "training set" as this is not an AI/machine learning device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This question is not applicable. There was no training set.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the circumference. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, with flowing lines extending downward from the bottom profile.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 11, 2016
Micromedics Inc. (d/b/a Nordson Medical) Ms. Amy Peterson Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1270 Eagan Industrial Rd. Suite 120 St. Paul, Minnesota 55121
Re: K162077
Trade/Device Name: Laparoscopic Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.1500 Regulation Name: Endoscope and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GCJ Dated: July 22, 2016 Received: July 27, 2016
Dear Ms. Peterson:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely.
Christopher J. Ronk -S
Fox Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K162077
Device Name
Laparoscopic Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers
Indications for Use (Describe) Intended for the application of two non-homogenous liquids.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | ||
|---|---|---|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K162077 – 510(K) SUMMARY
Contact Person
Micromedics, Inc.
Date of Summary Preparation: August 10, 2015
510(k) Applicant/Submitter Micromedics, Inc. Amy L. Peterson, M.A. d/b/a Nordson Medical Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1270 Eagan Industrial Road St. Paul, MN 55121-1385 d/b/a Nordson Medical Tel: 651-452-1977; Fax: 651-452-1787 1270 Eagan Industrial Road Establishment Registration #2183425 St. Paul, MN 55121-1385
| General Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Name | Laparoscopic Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers | ||
| ClassificationInformation | Endoscope and Accessoriesper 21 CFR 876.1500 (Class II) | Product Code | GCJ |
| Panel | General & Plastic Surgery | ||
| PredicateDevice | Micromedics Inc's 360° Gas Assisted Endoscopic Applicator, K122526, clearedNovember 16, 2012. |
Device Description
The Laparoscopic (Lap) Spray Applicators with Spinning Luers are sterile, single-use, disposable devices that are designed to mix two non-homogeneous liquids and to allow the resulting mixture to be applied by spraying on potentially difficult to reach treatment sites subcutaneously or within the body through a trocar.
The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers consists of a lap spray applicator and a filter/tubing assembly (also called the tubing set). The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers has the following functional parts:
- . Proximal hub (Y-connection) with spinning luers to connect to dual syringes (not provided) and an attachment point for the filter/tubing to the gas regulator (provided separately)
- Stainless steel shaft connecting hub to Pebax ●
- Flexible Pebax portion connecting stainless steel shaft to distal tip
- Fixed-position distal tip. ●
Lap Spray Applicator components are made from the following materials: White or Blue Polypropylene, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS - regular/non-radiopaque), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) with 20% barium (radiopaque), Stainless Steel, White Nylon, Light Blue Pebax, Epoxy Adhesive. Tubing Set components are made from the following materials: Clear Medical PVC. Natural Nylon, Stainless Steel Wire Mesh, Clear Polycarbonate, Blue Nylon or Red Nylon, Clear Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Clear Acrylic, Versapor Filter Media.
The device is packaged in a thermoformed tray with a tray (Tyvek) lid. Five (5) trays are then put into a shelf box and then a cardboard shipper box. Like the device from K122526, the Lap Spray Applicators with Spinning Luers are sterilized using ethylene oxide.
{4}------------------------------------------------
K162077 – 510(K) SUMMARY
Intended Use / Indications
Intended for the application of two non-homogenous liquids.
Substantial Equivalence Comparison
The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in the following characteristics:
- Operational mode
- Basic Scientific Technology .
- . Intended Use
- · General physical characteristics
Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Data
The Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers was evaluated through design verification and biocompatibility testing. Biocompatibility testing performed in accordance with ISO 10993 -Biological evaluation of medical devices, Part 1 – Evaluation and tests show the device is considered safe for use for its intended biocontact. Non-clinical testing included the tests listed below and showed the test articles met the pre-defined acceptance criteria, therefore demonstrating the mechanical integrity and suitability of the device for its intended use and over the labeled shelf life.
Testing was conducted for the following:
- Visual Inspection ●
- . Particulate Matter
- Dimensional Verification Test
- Leak Test
- . Spray Test
- Pebax/Tip Bond Strength
- . Pebax/Shaft Bond Strength
- . Hub/Shaft Pull Strength
- . Hub/Shaft Torque Strength
- Spinning Luer Actuation Torque ●
- Spinning Luer Side Load
- Spinning Luer Pull Strength
- ISO 594-1 and -2 (specifically: Luer Gauge, Luer Leak, Luer Separation, Luer Ease of Assembly, Luer Override, and Luer Stress Cracking)
- Sterilization ●
- Shelf life ●
Summary of Clinical Performance Data
None provided as a basis for substantial equivalence.
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
As evidenced by the successful completion of non-clinical performance testing, the Lap Spray Applicator with Spinning Luers does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate devices and is, therefore, substantially equivalent.
§ 876.1500 Endoscope and accessories.
(a)
Identification. An endoscope and accessories is a device used to provide access, illumination, and allow observation or manipulation of body cavities, hollow organs, and canals. The device consists of various rigid or flexible instruments that are inserted into body spaces and may include an optical system for conveying an image to the user's eye and their accessories may assist in gaining access or increase the versatility and augment the capabilities of the devices. Examples of devices that are within this generic type of device include cleaning accessories for endoscopes, photographic accessories for endoscopes, nonpowered anoscopes, binolcular attachments for endoscopes, pocket battery boxes, flexible or rigid choledochoscopes, colonoscopes, diagnostic cystoscopes, cystourethroscopes, enteroscopes, esophagogastroduodenoscopes, rigid esophagoscopes, fiberoptic illuminators for endoscopes, incandescent endoscope lamps, biliary pancreatoscopes, proctoscopes, resectoscopes, nephroscopes, sigmoidoscopes, ureteroscopes, urethroscopes, endomagnetic retrievers, cytology brushes for endoscopes, and lubricating jelly for transurethral surgical instruments. This section does not apply to endoscopes that have specialized uses in other medical specialty areas and that are covered by classification regulations in other parts of the device classification regulations.(b)
Classification —(1)Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an endoscope disinfectant basin, which consists solely of a container that holds disinfectant and endoscopes and accessories; an endoscopic magnetic retriever intended for single use; sterile scissors for cystoscope intended for single use; a disposable, non-powered endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument intended for single use; a diagnostic incandescent light source; a fiberoptic photographic light source; a routine fiberoptic light source; an endoscopic sponge carrier; a xenon arc endoscope light source; an endoscope transformer; an LED light source; or a gastroenterology-urology endoscopic guidewire, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I for the photographic accessories for endoscope, miscellaneous bulb adapter for endoscope, binocular attachment for endoscope, eyepiece attachment for prescription lens, teaching attachment, inflation bulb, measuring device for panendoscope, photographic equipment for physiologic function monitor, special lens instrument for endoscope, smoke removal tube, rechargeable battery box, pocket battery box, bite block for endoscope, and cleaning brush for endoscope. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 876.9.