(132 days)
No
The device description and performance studies focus on the mechanical function of the filter and catheter, with no mention of AI or ML capabilities.
Yes
The device is intended to prevent clinically significant pulmonary embolism and provide access to the central venous system, which are direct therapeutic interventions.
No
The Angel Catheter is intended for therapeutic purposes (prevention of pulmonary embolism, central venous access) and does not perform diagnostic functions. While its placement is assessed via radiograph, the device itself is not a diagnostic tool.
No
The device description clearly details a physical medical device consisting of a catheter and a filter, not software.
Based on the provided information, the Angel® Catheter is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostic devices are used to examine specimens taken from the human body (like blood, urine, or tissue) to provide information about a person's health. This testing is done outside of the body (in vitro).
- Angel® Catheter Function: The Angel® Catheter is a medical device that is inserted directly into the patient's body (in vivo). Its primary functions are:
- Mechanical filtration: The IVC filter component physically captures blood clots in the inferior vena cava.
- Central venous access: The catheter component provides a pathway for administering fluids, medications, and for blood sampling.
The device's purpose is to prevent pulmonary embolism and provide venous access within the patient's circulatory system, not to analyze samples taken from the patient.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multilumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
Product codes
PNS
Device Description
The Angel® Catheter is a retrievable vena cava filter permanently attached to a central venous access catheter. The conical, self-expanding, Nitinol filter has wide proximal openings that allow the capture of clots in the distal end of the filter. The filter is 50 mm long at its maximum expanded/unconstrained diameter of 30 mm. The distal end of the filter is free floating on the central venous catheter so that the filter can expand to the diameter of the vena cava.
The catheter is designed to constrain the IVC filter component in an unexpanded state for delivery to the IVC and to function as the sheath for retrieval of the IVC filter. It has '1 cm' depth markers indicating the depth the catheter has been inserted into the patient. For ease of placement, the catheter has a hydrophilic coating applied to the outer diameter up to the 24 cm depth marker.
The filter is permanently attached to the multi-lumen catheter to ensure secure positioning, while simultaneously providing access to the central venous system for administration of medications, fluids, or blood products; blood sampling; and monitoring of central venous pressure. The multi-lumen catheter and sheath connections are standard color-coded luer fittings, compatible with current ICU pressure monitoring equipment and other accessories. The Distal Tip Port and Proximal Sheath Port may be used for power injection of contrast media, and these luers contain specific pad printing indicating the maximum power injection rates.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), central venous system, femoral vein
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Biocompatibility Testing: The biocompatibility evaluation of the Angel® Catheter met the applicable ISO 10993 and ASTM test standards.
Performance Bench Testing: The performance bench testing for the Angel® Catheter conformed to the product specifications and met the applicable acceptance criteria.
Tests included: Dimensional, Visual, and Compatibility; Lumen Flow Rate; Tensile Testing; Pressure Monitoring; Aspiration; Multilumen Leakage; Catheter Burst/Hemostasis; Particulate; Power Injection Capability; Force to Deploy/Retrieve; Simulated Use - Pre-Clinical GLP Animal Study; Catheter Stiffness; Catheter Flexural Fatigue Tolerance; Catheter Coating Lubricity and Durability; Catheter Coating Coverage and Adhesion; Clot Trapping/Filter Efficiency; Filter Migration Resistance; Filter Durability (Fatigue); Corrosion; Filter FEA; Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compatibility; Radial Force; Active Af (BFR); Nickel Leaching.
Animal Studies: Multiple Non-GLP and GLP studies were conducted for the Angel® Catheter on porcine and ovine animal models. The results from these studies supported the safety and performance of the Angel® Catheter for use in human clinical studies.
Clinical Studies: Multiple clinical studies were performed with the Angel® Catheter including a First in Man (FIM) Pilot Study, a European Post-Market Registry Study, an Early Feasibility Study under FDA's Early Feasibility Program (EFP), and a Pivotal Study.
Pivotal Study:
- Study Goal: 150 evaluable subjects.
- Primary Endpoint: freedom from clinically significant PE or fatal PE at the time of discharge or up to 72 hours post device removal, whichever was first.
- Secondary Safety Endpoints: 1) Incidence of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis; 2) Incidence of catheter related thrombosis; 3) Incidence of catheter related blood stream infections: 4) Incidence of major bleeding event; and 5) Incidence of PEs averted.
- Sample Size: 163 eligible subjects (intention-to-treat (ITT) population), 151 subjects had the device in place for at least 48 hours (per-protocol (PP) population).
- Key Results:
- Freedom from clinically significant PE and fatal PE were reported for all subjects (i.e., no clinically significant or fatal PEs were reported in any of the study subjects as determined by the CEC). Thus, the primary effectiveness endpoint of the study was met.
- 30/163 (18.40%) ITT (30/151; 19.87% PP) acute proximal DVT including the 20/163 (12.27%) ITT (20/151; 13.25% PP) catheter-related DVTs.
- 0/163 (0.00%) ITT (0/151; 0.00% PP) catheter-related blood stream infection.
- 5/163 (3.07%) ITT (4/151; 2.65% PP) rate of major bleeding events.
- Averted PE rate was 14/163 (8.59%) ITT (14/151; 9.27% PP).
- The study device had no reported events related to filter fracture, migration or embolization.
- No serious adverse events (SAE) reported as a result of the device insertion.
- No infectious complications associated with the use of the Angel® Catheter.
- No device-related SAEs occurred during the insertion or removal of the device.
- No Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects reported.
- No serious Angel® Catheter-related clinically significant PEs, deaths, CRBSIs, or major bleeding occurred in any subjects during the study period.
- The bedside insertion of the Angel® Catheter is safe and effective for the prevention of clinically significant PEs in a high risk population of critically ill patients with contraindications to anticoagulation.
- The use of the device for an average of 6.79 days provided protection from PE in this population that was similar to that reported with the use of anticoagulation in the PROTECT study.
- The number of acute lower extremities DVTs as well as the number of catheter related thrombosis (CRT) are within the expected frequency of these events in critically ill patients with central venous catheters.
- Device malfunctions were mostly related to the non-functionality of one of the access ports and none of them resulted in a serious adverse event.
- The Pivotal Study successfully met all pre-specified primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile for the Angel® Catheter.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Cook® Celect® Vena Cava Filter K073374, Bard Eclipse™ Vena Cava Filter K093659, Edwards Multi-Med Central Venous Catheter K091709, ARROWG+ARD Blue Quad-Lumen Central Venous Catheter K962577
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 870.3375 Cardiovascular intravascular filter.
(a)
Identification. A cardiovascular intravascular filter is an implant that is placed in the inferior vena cava for the purpose of preventing pulmonary thromboemboli (blood clots generated in the lower limbs and broken loose into the blood stream) from flowing into the right side of the heart and the pulmonary circulation.(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) “Use of International Standards Organization's ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ” and
(2) FDA's:
(i) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance and Revision of 2/12/90 (K90-1)” and
(ii) “Guidance for Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter 510(k) Submissions.”
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized depiction of a bird or eagle in flight, composed of three overlapping profiles facing to the right. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 19, 2016
Bio2 Medical, Inc. Ms. Julie Ross Director, Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs 4670 Table Mountain Drive Golden, CO 80403
Re: K160747
Trade/Device Name: Angel Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3375 Regulation Name: Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PNS Dated: June 24, 2016 Received: June 27, 2016
Dear Ms. Ross:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of July 28, 2016.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
1
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carmen G. Johnson -S
for Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K160747/S001
Device Name Angel® Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multilumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
---|
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
| X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
Angel® Catheter 510(k) Notification (K160747)
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Bio2 Medical. The logo has the word "BIO2" on the top line, with the "BIO" in black and the "2" in blue. The word "MEDICAL" is on the second line in gray, with the registered trademark symbol to the right of the word.
510(k) Summary - Page 1 of 11
SUBMITTER l.
Applicant Name: | Bio2 Medical, Inc. |
---|---|
Address: | 4670 Table Mountain Drive |
Golden, CO 80403 | |
Phone: | (720) 833-5660 |
Fax: | (303) 422-4182 |
Contact Person: | Christopher E. Banas |
II. DEVICE
Trade Name: | Angel® Catheter |
---|---|
Catalog Number: | AC3930A |
Common or Usual Name: | Inferior Vena Cava Filter and Central Venous Catheter |
Classification: | Short-Term Intravascular Filter Catheter (21 CFR 870.3375) |
Device Class: | II |
Product Code: | PNS |
III. PREDICATE DEVICES
The Angel® Catheter combines the functions of a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous catheter (CVC). These functions have not been previously combined in a single device. Therefore, there are separate predicate devices identified with each function.
The Angel® Catheter legally marketed predicates, to which Bio2 Medical, Inc. is claiming equivalence, are listed below.
4
510(k) Summary - Page 2 of 11
Predicate Devices for the Angel® Catheter | ||
---|---|---|
Predicate Device Name | FDA 510(k) Number | |
Inferior Vena Cava | ||
(IVC) Filters | Cook® Celect® Vena Cava Filter | K073374 |
Bard Eclipse™ Vena Cava Filter | K093659 | |
Central Venous | ||
(CVC) Catheters | Edwards Multi-Med Central Venous Catheter | K091709 |
ARROWG+ARD Blue Quad-Lumen Central | ||
Venous Catheter | K962577 |
IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Angel® Catheter is a retrievable vena cava filter permanently attached to a central venous access catheter. The conical, self-expanding, Nitinol filter has wide proximal openings that allow the capture of clots in the distal end of the filter. The filter is 50 mm long at its maximum expanded/unconstrained diameter of 30 mm. The distal end of the filter is free floating on the central venous catheter so that the filter can expand to the diameter of the vena cava.
The catheter is designed to constrain the IVC filter component in an unexpanded state for delivery to the IVC and to function as the sheath for retrieval of the IVC filter. It has '1 cm' depth markers indicating the depth the catheter has been inserted into the patient. For ease of placement, the catheter has a hydrophilic coating applied to the outer diameter up to the 24 cm depth marker.
The filter is permanently attached to the multi-lumen catheter to ensure secure positioning, while simultaneously providing access to the central venous system for administration of medications, fluids, or blood products; blood sampling; and monitoring of central venous pressure. The multi-lumen catheter and sheath connections are standard color-coded luer fittings, compatible with current ICU pressure monitoring equipment and other accessories. The Distal Tip Port and Proximal Sheath Port may be used for power injection of contrast media, and these luers contain specific pad printing indicating the maximum power injection rates.
5
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
510(k) Summary - Page 3 of 11
Performance and Principle of Operation
The Angel® Catheter combines the functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous access catheter (CVC). It is designed for bedside percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava, via the femoral vein, for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Placement of the device is similar to a standard central venous catheter, followed by an abdominal radiograph to assess proper position of the catheter and filter. While in place, the catheter is maintained using the same techniques as a central venous catheter. When the indications for IVC filtration and/or central venous access are no longer present. the permanent attachment of the filter to the catheter ensures that the filter will be retrieved with the catheter at the time of removal. The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use (less than 30 days).
V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recurrent PE, and recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
6
510(k) Summary - Page 4 of 11
VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICES
The Angel® Catheter is substantially equivalent to both the vena cava filter and central venous catheter predicate devices identified with regard to the indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance characteristics. The major technological similarities and differences are summarized below:
Technological Comparison of Angel® Catheter to Predicate Devices | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) | |||||
Filters | Central Venous Catheters | ||||
(CVC) | |||||
Angel® | |||||
Catheter | Cook® | ||||
Celect® | |||||
Vena Cava | |||||
Filter | Bard Eclipse™ | ||||
Vena Cava | |||||
Filter | Edwards | ||||
Multi-Med | |||||
Central | |||||
Venous | |||||
Catheter | ARROWG+ARD | ||||
Blue Quad- | |||||
Lumen Central | |||||
Venous | |||||
Catheter | |||||
FDA 510(k) | |||||
Number | - | K073374 | K093659 | K091709 | K962577 |
Indications | |||||
for use | Per Section V | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
Placement | |||||
Duration | 24 hours from last | ||||
dose) of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for a surgical or | |||||
medical procedure | 6.2% (10/162) | 6.7% (10/150) | |||
Prophylactic use of the Angel® Catheter* | 98.2% (160/163) | 98.0% (148/151) | |||
* Defined as subjects without a confirmed ongoing PE. |
510(k) Summary - Page 9 of 11
Freedom from clinically significant PE and fatal PE were reported for all subjects (i.e., no clinically significant or fatal PEs were reported in any of the study subjects as determined by the CEC). Thus, the primary effectiveness endpoint of the study was met. Of the secondary safety endpoints, there were 30/163; 18.40% ITT (30/151; 19.87% PP) acute proximal DVT including the 20/163; 12.27% ITT (20/151; 13.25% PP) catheter-related DVTs, 0/163; 0.00% ITT (0/151; 0.00% PP) catheter-related blood stream infection, and 5/163; 3.07% ITT (4/151; 2.65% PP) rate of major bleeding events. In addition, the averted PE rate was 14/163; 8.59% ITT (14/151; 9.27% PP). The study device had no reported events related to filter fracture, migration or embolization. There were no serious adverse events (SAE) reported as a result of the device insertion. There were no infectious complications associated with the use of the Angel® Catheter and no devicerelated SAEs occurred during the insertion or removal of the device.
There were no Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects reported. No serious Angel® Catheter-related clinically significant PEs, deaths, CRBSIs, or major bleeding occurred in any subjects during the study period. All SAEs are discussed below.
12
System Organ Class/Preferred Term | Number of Events, ITT Population | Number of Subjects, ITT Population (N= 163 ) |
---|---|---|
Any Serious Adverse Event | 66 | 49 (30.1%) |
Cardiac Disorders | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
Cardiac Arrest | 4 | 4 (2.5%) |
Supraventricular Tachycardia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
General Disorders And Administration Site | ||
Conditions | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
Brain Death | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
Multi-Organ Failure | 3 | 3 (1.8%) |
Hepatobiliary Disorders | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Chronic Hepatic Failure | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Infections And Infestations | 11 | 8 (4.9%) |
Abdominal Sepsis | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Lobar Pneumonia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Pneumonia | 6 | 6 (3.7%) |
Sepsis | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
Septic Shock | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Injury, Poisoning And Procedural Complications | 7 | 7 (4.3%) |
Craniocerebral Injury | 4 | 4 (2.5%) |
Post Procedural Haemorrhage | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Subdural Haematoma | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Subdural Haemorrhage | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Nervous System Disorders | 9 | 9 (5.5%) |
Brain Hypoxia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Brain Oedema | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Cerebrovascular Accident | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Haemorrhage Intracranial | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Intracranial Pressure Increased | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
Renal And Urinary Disorders | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
Renal Failure | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Renal Failure Acute | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Respiratory, Thoracic And Mediastinal Disorders | 9 | 9 (5.5%) |
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Pleural Effusion | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Pulmonary Embolism | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Respiratory Failure | 6 | 6 (3.7%) |
Vascular Disorders | 17 | 17 (10.4%) |
Deep Vein Thrombosis | 10 | 10 (6.1%) |
Haemodynamic Instability | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Hypotension | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
Pelvic Venous Thrombosis | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
Vena Cava Thrombosis | 3 | 3 (1.8%) |
510(k) Summary - Page 10 of 11
Numbers are % (counts/sample size).
13
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
Angel® Catheter 510(k) Notification (K160747)
510(k) Summary - Page 11 of 11
In conclusion, the Pivotal Study demonstrated that the bedside insertion of the Angel® Catheter is safe and that this device is an effective alternative for the prevention of clinically significant PEs in a high risk population of critically ill patients with contraindications to anticoagulation.
The use of the device for an average of 6.79 days provided protection from PE in this population that was similar to that reported with the use of anticoagulation in the PROTECT study in critically ill subjects with no contraindications to anticoagulation, providing protection for the period with the highest risk of thromboembolic events. There were no clinically significant PEs reported in the study, which is lower than the anticipated rate of these events in this critically ill population with high rates of DVTs and contraindications to anticoagulation.
The Angel® Catheter was not associated with any catheter related blood stream infections. The number of acute lower extremities DVTs as well as the number of catheter related thrombosis (CRT) are within the expected frequency of these events in critically ill patients with central venous catheters. The device malfunctions were mostly related to the non-functionality of one of the access ports and none of them resulted in a serious adverse event.
Thus, this Pivotal Study successfully met all pre-specified primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial, and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile for the Angel® Catheter.
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Based on clinical data, performance testing, and similarities in indications for use, materials, technological characteristics, principle of operation and design features, Bio2 Medical, Inc. considers the Angel® Catheter performance to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices listed above in terms of safety and performance. Device differences do not raise any new issues of safety or effectiveness.