(51 days)
The Penumbra System / Penumbra System MAX are intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
The Penumbra System is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral – M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. The Reperfusion Catheters ACE 64 and ACE 68 are intended for use in revascularization within the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
The subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly connects the Pump Canister to the Reperfusion Catheters, providing a means for introducing vacuum during procedures, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. Furthermore, the 110 Aspiration Tubing has a flow valve that allows the physician to start and stop the flow of aspiration, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. The Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing has a slightly larger inner diameter of 0.110in compared to the predicate to accommodate larger clot burdens, this is the only difference to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. The Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing is compatible with all Penumbra System Reperfusion Catheters and Separators included in K133317 and K142458. The device is provided sterile, non-pyrogenic, and intended for single use only, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458].
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing, a medical device used for revascularization in acute ischemic stroke patients. The provided text describes the acceptance criteria and study results for this device, which focuses on non-clinical testing for biocompatibility and bench-top performance.
Here's an analysis of the provided information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Test / Attribute | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance | Pass / Fail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biocompatibility Testing | |||
| Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution) / EN ISO 10993-5 | Sample extracts must yield a cell lysis grade of 2 or lower. | Grade 0: None | Pass |
| Sensitization / EN ISO 10993-10 | Test Group shall yield Grade < 1 score on Magnusson and Kligman scale (provided Control Grade < 1). | Grade 0: No visible change | Pass |
| Irritation (Intracutaneous Reactivity Irritation Test) / EN ISO 10993-10 | The difference in the mean test article and mean control score must be grade 1.0 or lower. | Grade 0.1 difference (saline extract) and Grade 0.2 difference (cottonseed oil extract) | Pass |
| Bench-top Testing | Results (All were reported as "Pass" against a "100% Must meet Specification" criteria. The "Specification" column describes the performance.) | ||
| Dimensional/Visual Inspection | Confirm that the units used in this Design Verification testing meet all inspection criteria for release of finished goods (clinically acceptable) product. | The device met all inspection criteria. | Pass |
| Suction Connector | 110 Aspiration Tubing securely attaches to canister lid. | Securely attached. | Pass |
| RHV Compatibility | 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly distal luer securely connects to RHV port. | Securely connected. | Pass |
| Lumen Ovalization | 110 Aspiration Tubing maintains functionality and maintains an open lumen at vacuum pressure of 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum. | Maintained functionality and an open lumen at 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum. | Pass |
| Joints Leak | 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly maintains functionality with no leaks at vacuum pressure of 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum. | Maintained functionality with no leaks at 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum. | Pass |
| Suction Connector / Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | Tested at or above 2.0 lbf minimum. (Implied by Pass and 100% meet spec) | Pass |
| Distal Rotating Male Luer / Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | Tested at or above 2.0 lbf minimum. (Implied by Pass and 100% meet spec) | Pass |
| Proximal Rotating Male Luer / Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | Tested at or above 2.0 lbf minimum. (Implied by Pass and 100% meet spec) | Pass |
| Female Luer / Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | Tested at or above 2.0 lbf minimum. (Implied by Pass and 100% meet spec) | Pass |
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the sample size (number of units) for each specific test in the "Bench-top Testing" section. It notes "units used in this Design Verification testing," implying multiple units were tested, but the exact count isn't given. For biocompatibility, it refers to "a series of previously successfully performed studies on the predicate device," which doesn't specify the sample size for the current device's testing.
- Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for the data. The biocompatibility tests were "conducted pursuant to 21 CFR, Part 58, Good Laboratory Practices (GLP)," which suggests a controlled experimental setting, likely within the US given the FDA submission. The studies were retrospective in the sense that the biocompatibility data was "derived from a series of previously successfully performed studies on the predicate device." The bench-top testing appears to be newly performed for the subject device.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
Not applicable. This is a submission for a physical medical device (aspiration tubing), not an AI algorithm requiring expert ground truth for interpretation of images or other data. The "ground truth" for the performance tests would be the measured physical and mechanical properties of the device against predefined engineering specifications.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
Not applicable. As this involves physical device testing against specifications, there is no need for expert adjudication in the manner of diagnostic AI performance evaluation. The results are objective measurements against set criteria.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done:
No. This is a submission for a physical medical device. MRMC studies are relevant for evaluating the performance of diagnostic imaging aids or AI tools where human readers interpret cases.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done:
Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
For biocompatibility, the ground truth was established by internationally recognized standards (EN ISO 10993-1, 10993-5, 10993-10) and their specific acceptance criteria for cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation.
For bench-top testing, the ground truth was established by documented engineering specifications and direct physical measurements (e.g., specific force in lbf, vacuum pressure, visual inspection for defects).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm.
In summary, this document details the non-clinical testing for the Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing. The device demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices through successful completion of biocompatibility and bench-top performance tests, meeting all specified acceptance criteria. The evaluation did not involve AI, human readers, or expert ground truth in the context of diagnostic performance.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the logo is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with a flowing ribbon-like element beneath them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 6, 2015
Penumbra, Inc. Ms. Michaela Mahl Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs One Penumbra Place Alameda, California 94502
Re: K151623
Trade/Device Name: Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NRY Dated: July 6, 2015 Received: Julv 7, 2015
Dear Ms. Mahl:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carlos L. Pena =5)/△
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K151623
Device Name
Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Penumbra System / Penumbra System MAX are intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K151623
Device Name
Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Penumbra System is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. The Reperfusion Catheters ACE 64 and ACE 68 are intended for use in revascularization within the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | |
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
1 510(k) Summary
(as required by 21 CFR 807.92)
Pursuant to Section 12, Part (a)(i)(3A) of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, Penumbra Inc. is providing the summary of Substantial Equivalence for the Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing.
Sponsor/Applicant Name and Address 1.1
Penumbra, Inc. One Penumbra Place Alameda, CA 94502 USA
1.2 Sponsor Contact Information
Michaela Mahl Senior Manager, Regulatory Affairs Phone: (510) 748-3288 FAX: (510) 217-6414 Email: michaela.mahl@penumbrainc.com
1.3 Date of Preparation of 510(k) Summary
August 06, 2015
1.4 Device Trade or Proprietary Name
Penumbra System® 110 Aspiration Tubing
1.5 Device Classification
| Regulatory Class: | II |
|---|---|
| Classification Panel: | Neurology |
| Classification Name: | Percutaneous Catheter |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR §870.1250 |
| Product Code: | NRY (Catheter, Thrombus Removal) |
1.6 Predicate Devices
| 510(k) Number / ClearanceDate | Name of Predicate Device | Name of Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| K133317 [13MAY2014] | Penumbra System® andPenumbra System MAX® | Penumbra, Inc.One Penumbra PlaceAlameda, CA 94502 USA |
| K142458 [22May2015] | Penumbra System® ACE 64 andACE 68 Reperfusion Catheters | Penumbra, Inc.One Penumbra PlaceAlameda, CA 94502 USA |
{5}------------------------------------------------
1.7 Predicate Comparison
Predicate 1:
| Predicate Device | Subject Device | |
|---|---|---|
| Device Name | MAX Aspiration Tubing | 110 Aspiration Tubing |
| 510(k) No. | K133317 | K151623 |
| Classification | Class II, NRY | SAME |
| Indication | The Penumbra System / Penumbra SystemMAX are intended for use in therevascularization of patients with acuteischemic stroke secondary to intracraniallarge vessel occlusive disease (within theinternal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 andM2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries)within 8 hours of symptom onset. | SAME |
| Materials | ||
| Luer fittings | Polycarbonate (2018-15-FC030004 orequivalent); Isoplast 2530; EPDM RED,Silicone coated | SAME |
| Adhesive | Loctite 3311 (Acrylated Urethane) | SAME |
| Solvent | Cyclohexanone, MEK solvent | SAME |
| Vacuum connector | Polyvinylchloride | SAME |
| Tubing | Polyurethane (Pellethane 2363-80A) andNylon | SAME |
| Male/Female adaptor Luer | Polycarbonate (Makrolon or equivalent) | SAME |
| Flow control switch | Polycarbonate (Lexan or equiv); Acetal(Hostaform or equiv); ABS; Silicone | SAME |
| OFF label | Polyolefin (red) | SAME |
| ON label | MARAPROP PP black ink (solvent naphtha(petroleum); 2-methoxy-1-methylethylacetate; xylene; ethylbenzene) | SAME |
| Dimensions | ||
| Tubing OD | $0.188in \pm 0.005in$ | SAME |
| Tubing ID | $0.088in \pm 0.005in$ | $0.110in \pm 0.005in$ |
| Overall Length | $112.0in \pm 7.0in$ | SAME |
| Distal Length | $7.0in \pm 2.0in$ | SAME |
| Accessories | None | SAME |
| Packaging Materials | ||
| Pouch | Polyester/Polyethylene/Tyvek® | SAME |
| Display Carton | SBS Paperboard | SAME |
| Packaging Configuration | Individual | SAME |
| Sterilization | EO | SAME |
| Shelf-Life | 36 Months | SAME |
| Predicate Device | Subject Device | |
| Device Name | MAX Aspiration Tubing | 110 Aspiration Tubing |
| 510(k) No. | K142458 | K151623 |
| Classification | Class II, NRY | SAME |
| Indication | The Penumbra System is intended for use inthe revascularization of patients with acuteischemic stroke secondary to intracraniallarge vessel occlusive disease (within theinternal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 andM2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries)within 8 hours of symptom onset. TheReperfusion Catheters ACE 64 and ACE 68are intended for use in revascularizationwithin the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA)within 8 hours of symptom onset. | SAME |
| Materials | ||
| Luer fittings | Polycarbonate (2018-15-FC030004 orequivalent); Isoplast 2530; EPDM RED,Silicone coated | SAME |
| Adhesive | Loctite 3311 (Acrylated Urethane) | SAME |
| Solvent | Cyclohexanone, MEK solvent | SAME |
| Vacuum connectorTubing | PolyvinylchloridePolyurethane (Pellethane 2363-80A) andNylon | SAME |
| Male/Female adaptor Luer | Polycarbonate (Makrolon or equivalent) | SAME |
| Flow control switch | Polycarbonate (Lexan or equiv); Acetal(Hostaform or equiv); ABS; Silicone | SAME |
| OFF label | Polyolefin (red) | SAME |
| ON label | MARAPROP PP black ink (solvent naphtha(petroleum); 2-methoxy-1-methylethylacetate; xylene; ethylbenzene) | SAME |
| Dimensions | ||
| Tubing OD | $0.188in \pm 0.005in$ | SAME |
| Tubing ID | $0.088in \pm 0.005in$ | $0.110in \pm 0.005in$ |
| Overall Length | $112.0in \pm 7.0in$ | SAME |
| Distal Length | $7.0in \pm 2.0in$ | SAME |
| Accessories | None | SAME |
| Packaging Materials | ||
| Pouch | Polyester/Polyethylene/Tyvek® | SAME |
| Display Carton | SBS Paperboard | SAME |
| Packaging Configuration | Individual | SAME |
| Sterilization | EO | SAME |
| Shelf-Life | 36 Months | SAME |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Predicate 2:
{7}------------------------------------------------
1.8 Device Description
The subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly connects the Pump Canister to the Reperfusion Catheters, providing a means for introducing vacuum during procedures, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. Furthermore, the 110 Aspiration Tubing has a flow valve that allows the physician to start and stop the flow of aspiration, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. The Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing has a slightly larger inner diameter of 0.110in compared to the predicate to accommodate larger clot burdens, this is the only difference to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458]. The Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing is compatible with all Penumbra System Reperfusion Catheters and Separators included in K133317 and K142458. The device is provided sterile, non-pyrogenic, and intended for single use only, which is identical to the predicate MAX Aspiration Tubing [K133317 and K142458].
Indications For Use 1.9
The Penumbra System / Penumbra System MAX are intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
and
The Penumbra System is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral – M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. The Reperfusion Catheters ACE 64 and ACE 68 are intended for use in revascularization within the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) within 8 hours of symptom onset.
1.10 Summary of Non-Clinical Data
As required under Section 12, Part (a)(i)(3A) of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, a summary of any information regarding substantial equivalence of the device follows.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Included in this section are summary descriptions of the testing, which substantiates the performance of the subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing as well as its substantial equivalence to the predicate device:
- Biocompatibility
- . Design Verification (Bench-Top Testing)
The subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing device met all established requirements.
1.10.1 Biocompatibility Testing
Evidence of the biocompatibility of the 110 Aspiration Tubing materials is derived from a series of previously successfully performed studies on the predicate device. The studies were selected in accordance with EN ISO 10993-1 guidelines. The studies were selected in accordance with EN ISO 10993-1 guidelines (Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices) for a limited exposure (ك 24 hours), surface device, with skin contact. All studies were conducted pursuant to 21 CFR, Part 58, Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). The following tests were previously performed and all tests passed successfully:
| Test / Standard | Acceptance Criteria | Results | Pass / Fail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution)/ EN ISO 10993-5 | Sample extracts must yield acell lysis grade of 2 or lower | Grade 0: None | Pass |
| Sensitization / EN ISO10993-10 | Test Group shall yield Grade <1 score on Magnusson andKligman scale (providedControl Grade < 1) | Grade 0: No visible change | Pass |
| Irritation (IntracutaneousReactivity Irritation Test) /EN ISO 10993-10 | The difference in the mean testarticle and mean control scoremust be grade 1.0 or lower | Grade 0.1 difference (salineextract) and Grade 0.2difference (cottonseed oilextract) | Pass |
As all materials of the subject 110 Aspiration Tubing are identical to the materials of the predicate device [K133317 and K142458] biocompatibility is established. In summary, non-clinical testing found the 110 Aspiration Tubing materials to be non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, and a non-irritant.
1.10.2 Bench-top Testing
The physical and mechanical properties of the Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing was assessed using the identical test methods and acceptance criteria as
{9}------------------------------------------------
the predicate [K133317 and K142458]. The following tests were performed and all tests passed successfully:
| Attribute | Specification | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional/Visual Inspection | These evaluations confirm that the units used in this Design Verification testing meet all inspection criteria for release of finished goods (clinically acceptable) product. | Pass | |
| Performance/SimulatedUse and Leak Test | |||
| Suction Connector | 110 Aspiration Tubing securely attaches to canister lid | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| RHV Compatibility | 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly distal luer securely connects to RHV port | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Lumen Ovalization | 110 Aspiration Tubing maintains functionality and maintains an open lumen at vacuum pressure of 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Joints Leak | 110 Aspiration Tubing Assembly maintains functionality with no leaks at vacuum pressure of 25inHg minimum for 30 seconds minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Destructive Testing | |||
| Suction Connector /Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Distal Rotating MaleLuer / Tubing Joint | 2.0 lbf minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Proximal RotatingMale Luer / TubingJoint | 2.0 lbf minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
| Female Luer / TubingJoint | 2.0 lbf minimum | 100% Must meetSpecification | Pass |
The results of the tests appropriately address the physical and mechanical performance expectations of the device. Based on these overall results, the physical and mechanical properties of the subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing is acceptable for the intended use and substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
1.10.3 Summary of Substantial Equivalence
The subject Penumbra System 110 Aspiration Tubing is substantially equivalent to the predicate device [K133317 and K142458] with regard to intended use, operating principle, design concept, materials, shelf-life, packaging and sterilization processes.
§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.
(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).