(152 days)
Not Found
No
The description focuses on the material properties and manufacturing process (milling) of a denture base block, with no mention of AI or ML for analysis, decision-making, or image processing beyond basic CAD/CAM operations.
No.
The document states that the Acrylic Block is used to fabricate a denture, which replaces missing teeth and surrounding tissue. While dentures improve function and appearance, they are considered restorative or prosthetic devices rather than devices that provide therapy or treatment for a disease or medical condition.
No
Explanation: The device description states that the Acrylic Block is used to "fabricate a denture." This is a manufacturing process for a prostheses, not a diagnostic process that identifies or characterizes a disease or condition. The "3D denture image" is used for design and fabrication, not for diagnosing a patient.
No
The device is a physical acrylic block used to fabricate dentures, not a software-only medical device. While it is used in conjunction with CAD/CAM software, the device itself is a material.
No, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is to "fabricate a denture." This is a device used in the mouth for a prosthetic purpose, not for testing samples outside the body to diagnose or monitor a medical condition.
- Device Description: The description details a material used for creating a physical dental prosthesis. It doesn't mention any reagents, calibrators, or other components typically associated with IVD tests.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies focus on biocompatibility and mechanical properties relevant to a dental material used in the mouth, not on the accuracy or reliability of a diagnostic test.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, detecting analytes, or providing diagnostic information.
This device is clearly a dental material used in the manufacturing of a denture, which is a medical device, but not an in vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
Acrylic Block is a cured base acrylic resin that is indicated for use to fabricate a denture.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
EBI
Device Description
The Acrylic Block is a solid block of an acrylic polymer block that includes small quantities of color pigments. This Acrylic Block is a high polymer material made from quality poly methyl methacrylate. Poly (methyl methacrylate) is commonly used for thermopolymerizable acrylic resin denture bases because of its properties, including color and durability. In vitro tests have also shown its biocompatibility and enhancement of flexural behavior properties.
To fabricate the denture base, the Acrylic Block is milling machine utilizing the CAM data. After a 3D denture image is structured using the 3D CAD software, the artificial teeth are factored out, and a 3D denture base image is obtained. The Acrylic Block is then milled to the shape of the denture base. The artificial teeth are then bonded to the milled denture base using a bonding material and polished.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Extensive testing has been performed on the subject denture base resin to demonstrate compliance with EN ISO 7405:1997 Dentistry; Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry, Test methods for dental materials; and EN ISO 1567:1995 Denture Base Polymers.
Biocompatibility testing:
- Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution Test) – The Acrylic Block was found to be non-cytotoxic and all test method acceptance criteria were met per ISO 10993-5, JIS T 6001, Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Skin Sensitisation (Guinea Pig Maximization) - Acrylic Block is considered to cause no sensitization under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-10, IIST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Intracutaneous Reactivity - Acrylic Block caused no signs of irritation, met the requirements of the test, and is classified as not irritant per ISO 10993-10, JIS T 6001, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Subchronic Toxicity - Acrylic Block is considered to not cause significant systemic toxicity under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-11, JIS T 6001, Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1. And Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Genotoxicity (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test) - Acrylic Block extract is considered to be non-clastogenic under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-3, JIST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Genotoxicity Bacterial Reverse Mutation (AMES) Test - Acrylic Block was considered non-mutagenic (non-genotoxic and non-clastogenic) under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-3, JJST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
Mechanical testing: Performance testing was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the Acrylic Block. Specimens for each test were made according to the ADA/ANSI Specification No. 12: 2002 (Reaffirmed 2008) Denture Base Polymers to evaluate the subject devices flexural and tensile strengths, and fracture toughness. The subject device was also examined the ADA specification for surface characteristics, color, translucency, freedom from porosity, flexural strength, flexural modulus, residual methyl methacrylate monomer, sorption and solubility. It was concluded that the Acrylic Block met all acceptance criterion and hence are substantially equivalent to Yamahachi Denture Base Resins in terms of mechanical properties. It was also concluded that the Sun Medical Acrylic Block show a substantially similar performance other predicate denture base resins during non-clinical bench testing.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 872.3760 Denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin.
(a)
Identification. A denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin is a device composed of materials such as methylmethacrylate, intended to reline a denture surface that contacts tissue, to repair a fractured denture, or to form a new denture base. This device is not available for over-the-counter (OTC) use.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the top half of the circle. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other. The profiles are simple and abstract, with no facial features.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 14, 2015
Sun Medical Co. Ltd. c/o Carrie Hetrick, D.D.S. Emergo Group 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 Austin, Texas 78701
Re: K143265
Trade/Device Name: Acrylic Block Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3760 Regulation Name: Denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EBI Dated: March 6, 2015 Received: March 10, 2015
Dear Dr. Hetrick:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
1
Page 2 - Carrie Hetrick, D.D.S.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Tina
Kiang -S
for Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K143265
Device Name Acrylic Block
Indications for Use (Describe)
Acrylic Block is a cured base acrylic resin that is indicated for use to fabricate a denture.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary
for
Acrylic Block
1. Submission Sponsor
Sun Medical Co., Ltd. 571-2, Furutaka-cho Moriyama, Shiga 524-0044 Japan Phone: 81-77-582-9978 Fax: 81-77-582-9984 Contact: Mr. Yukihito Yukimune, Pharmaceutical Affairs Department Director
2. Submission Correspondent
Emergo Group 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 Austin, TX 78701 Cell Phone: (720) 833.4113 Office Phone: (512) 327.9997 Fax: (512) 327.9998 Contact: Carrie Hetrick, Senior Consultant, Regulatory Affairs Email: project.management@emergogroup.com
3. Date Prepared
April 14, 2015
4. Device Identification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Acrylic Block |
|---|---|
| Common/Usual Name: | Denture Base Resin |
| Classification Name: | Denture Relining, Repairing, or Rebasing Resin |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR § 872.3760 |
| Product Code: | EBI |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | Dental |
5. Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s)
Yamahachi Dental Manufacturing Co., Yamahachi Denture Base Resins- K131036
6. Device Description
The Acrylic Block is a solid block of an acrylic polymer block that includes small quantities of color pigments. This Acrylic Block is a high polymer material made from quality poly methyl methacrylate. Poly (methyl methacrylate) is commonly used for thermopolymerizable
4
acrylic resin denture bases because of its properties, including color and durability. In vitro tests have also shown its biocompatibility and enhancement of flexural behavior properties.
To fabricate the denture base, the Acrylic Block is milling machine utilizing the CAM data. After a 3D denture image is structured using the 3D CAD software, the artificial teeth are factored out, and a 3D denture base image is obtained. The Acrylic Block is then milled to the shape of the denture base. The artificial teeth are then bonded to the milled denture base using a bonding material and polished.
7. Indication for Use Statement
Acrylic Block is a cured base acrylic resin that is indicated for use to fabricate a denture.
8. Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The following table compares the Acrylic Block to the predicate device with respect to intended use, technological characteristics and principles of operation, providing more detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
| Manufacturer | Sun Medical Co., Ltd. | Yamahachi Dental Manufacturing
Co. |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | Acrylic Block | Yamahachi Denture Base
Resins |
| 510(k) Number | K143265 | K131036 |
| Product Code | EBI | EBI |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR § 872.3760 | 21 CFR § 872.3760 |
| Regulation Name | Denture Base Resin | Denture Base Resin |
| Device Description | It is used for creation of a denture
base with a computer-aided-
design and computer-aided-
manufacturing unit. | Traditional heat-cure and
microwave-cure acrylic resign for
total or partial denture base and
for removable prosthesis |
| Indications for Use | Acrylic Block is a cured base acrylic
resin that is indicated for use to
fabricate a denture. | Yamahachi Denture Base Resins
is a system of heat- and self-cure
acrylic polymers intended for
fabrication or repair of the denture
base. |
| Composition of Material - | Block made by Methyl | Polymer powder and monomer |
| the chemical composition of
the device | methacrylate (MMA) monomer | liquid |
| Polymerization (Curing)
Method | Acrylic Blocks polymerization is
completed by heat curing method
at 20° C to 80° C. | Water Bath: Immerse flask in
water & slowly raise to boiling
over 30 min, boil 30-40 min, air
cool 30 min (Basis & Basis HI);
Curing: Immerse flask in boiling
water 30 min (Basis TC) |
| Components | PMMA, initiator, pigments | Powder: PMMA, MMA (Basis Hi),
Initiator, pigments
Liquid:-MMA, Crosslinker, activator
(Basis TC) |
| Standards of Conformity | ISO 9001:2007, ISO 13485:2002 | ISO 9001:2007, ISO 13485:2002 |
| Table 5A - Comparison of Characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | ------------------------------------------ | -- | -- |
5
| Manufacturer | Sun Medical Co., Ltd. | Yamahachi Dental Manufacturing Co. |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Name | Acrylic Block | Yamahachi Denture Base Resins |
| ISO 14971 | ISO 14971 | |
| Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-1, ISO 7405 | ISO 10993-1, ISO 7405 |
| Physical Properties | ISO 20795-1, ANSI/ADA 12:2002 | ISO 20795-1 |
9. Non-Clinical Performance Data
Extensive testing has been performed on the subject denture base resin to demonstrate compliance with EN ISO 7405:1997 Dentistry; Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry, Test methods for dental materials; and EN ISO 1567:1995 Denture Base Polymers. The following testing has been performed to support substantial equivalence:
Biocompatibility -The biocompatibility of the Acrylic Block was evaluated in accordance with ISO 7405:2008, ISO 10993-1: 2009 and guidance document entitled Blue Book Memo, G95-1, Use of International Standard ISO-10993, and Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices: Part 1: Evaluation and Testing. Under these, for the stated indications for use, the device was classified as a permanent exposure (C), surface-contacting device in contact with mucosal membranes. The Sun Medical Acrylic Block biocompatibility was tested for the following with the final results.
- . Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution Test) – The Acrylic Block was found to be non-cytotoxic and all test method acceptance criteria were met per ISO 10993-5, JIS T 6001, Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- . Skin Sensitisation (Guinea Pig Maximization) - Acrylic Block is considered to cause no sensitization under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-10, IIST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- Intracutaneous Reactivity - Acrylic Block caused no signs of irritation, met the requirements of the test, and is classified as not irritant per ISO 10993-10, JIS T 6001, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- . Subchronic Toxicity - Acrylic Block is considered to not cause significant systemic toxicity under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-11, JIS T 6001, Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1. And Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- . Genotoxicity (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test) - Acrylic Block extract is considered to be non-clastogenic under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-3, JIST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
- . Genotoxicity Bacterial Reverse Mutation (AMES) Test - Acrylic Block was considered non-mutagenic (non-genotoxic and non-clastogenic) under the experimental conditions of this study per ISO 10993-3, JJST T 6001:2012 Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-1, and Yakushokukihatsu No. 0301-20.
Mechanical Testing – Performance testing of the Acrylic Block included testing for denture base polymers and copolymers in ISO 20795-1, Dentistry -- Base polymers -- Part 1: Denture
6
base polymers, ISO 22112 Dentistry - Artificial teeth for dental prostheses, and ANSI/ADA Specification No. 12 - Denture Base Polymers.
Performance testing was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the Acrylic Block. Specimens for each test were made according to the ADA/ANSI Specification No. 12: 2002 (Reaffirmed 2008) Denture Base Polymers to evaluate the subject devices flexural and tensile strengths, and fracture toughness. The subject device was also examined the ADA specification for surface characteristics, color, translucency, freedom from porosity, flexural strength, flexural modulus, residual methyl methacrylate monomer, sorption and solubility. It was concluded that the Acrylic Block met all acceptance criterion and hence are substantially equivalent to Yamahachi Denture Base Resins in terms of mechanical properties. It was also concluded that the Sun Medical Acrylic Block show a substantially similar performance other predicate denture base resins during non-clinical bench testing.
Risk Management – Risk Analysis was conducted according to ISO 14971, and the outcomes of these risks are considered acceptable, and that all potential risks have been mitigated to the lowest form.
PMMA resin continues to be the universal, versatile polymer in prosthetic dentistry. The Acrylic Block has the same biological performance as predict PMMA resins.
As part of demonstrating that the Acrylic Block is substantially equivalent to predicate devices that are subject to this 510(k) submission, Sun Medical Co., Ltd. completed a number of tests. The Acrylic Block meets all the requirements for overall design and biocompatibility confirms that the output meets the design inputs and specifications. The Acrylic Block passed all testing stated above as shown by the acceptable results obtained in accordance with national and international standards.
10. Clinical Performance Data
There was no clinical testing required to support the medical device as the indications for use is equivalent to the predicate device. These types of devices, including the predicate devices, have been on the market for many years and there are no adverse reactions. The non-clinical testing detailed in this submission supports the substantial equivalence of the device.
11. Statement of Substantial Equivalence
By definition, a device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device when the device has the same intended use and the same technological characteristics as the previously cleared predicate device. Or the device has the same intended use and different technological characteristics that can be demonstrated that the device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, and that the new device does not raise different questions regarding its safety and effectiveness as compared to the predicate device.
The Acrylic Block has the same or similar intended use, indications, principles of operation, and technological characteristics as the predicate devices. The Acrylic Block, as designed and manufactured, is determined to be substantially equivalent to the referenced predicate devices in terms of intended use, design, materials, and function.