(108 days)
Not Found
No
The document describes a physical interbody fusion device and its materials, intended use, and performance testing. There is no mention of software, algorithms, or any technology that would typically incorporate AI or ML. The "Mentions AI, DNN, or ML" field is explicitly marked as "Not Found".
No
The device is an interbody fusion device used to treat Degenerative Disc Disease by providing spinal stability and promoting fusion, which is considered a treatment rather than a diagnostic or therapeutic function.
No
The device description indicates it is an interbody fusion device, a type of implant used to treat degenerative disc disease by promoting spinal fusion. It is a therapeutic device, not a diagnostic one. While its "Indications for Use" mention "radiographic studies" for diagnosis of DDD, the device itself is not performing the diagnosis.
No
The device description clearly states that the Ancora system consists of implantable components manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy and PEEK, which are hardware components. The submission also mentions surgical instruments.
No, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are devices intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body (such as blood, urine, or tissue) to provide information for the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease.
- Device Description: The Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is an implantable medical device made of titanium alloy and PEEK. It is surgically placed in the spine to facilitate fusion.
- Intended Use: The intended use is to treat Degenerative Disc Disease by providing structural support and promoting bone fusion. This is a surgical intervention, not a diagnostic test performed on a specimen.
- Input: While radiographic studies are used to confirm the diagnosis and guide the procedure, the device itself does not process or analyze these images to provide a diagnosis. The images are used by a healthcare professional to assess the patient's condition and plan the surgery.
The device is a surgical implant used in the treatment of a condition, not a diagnostic tool that analyzes biological samples.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The device must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., lateral plating or pedicle screw systems), which is in addition to the integrated locking plates provided in the system. When used with the integrated locking plates, it is indicated to be used at one level from L2-L5. When used without the integrated locking plates, it is indicated to be used at one or two contiguous levels, from L2-S1. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OVD, MAX
Device Description
The Ancora system consists of different footprints and heights to provide options that correlate best to an individual's anatomy and pathology. The system offers optional integrated locking plates with corresponding locking pins. Implantable components are manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI) per ASTM F136 and PEEK Optima LT1 per ASTM F2026 with tantalum markers per ASTM F560. Supplemental anterior and/or posterior fixation is intended for use with the device to ensure stability of the spine.
The purpose of this submission is to add implant configurations to the Ancora LLC line of implants, and modify the indications for use so the locking plates are optional fixation devices. Surgical Instruments are also available for use with the system.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
L2-L5, L2-S1 (lumbar disc space)
Indicated Patient Age Range
Skeletally mature patients
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Static and dynamic axial compression and static and dynamic compression shear were completed following ASTM F2077. Expulsion testing was conducted following a recognized protocol to allow comparison evaluation of intervertebral body fusion device assemblies, and characterize their resistance to expulsion. The above pre-clinical testing performed on the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device indicated that the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and is adequate for the intended use.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 26, 2015
Frontier Medical Devices, Incorporated % Rich Jansen, Pharm.D. Silver Pine Consulting, LLC 11821 Bramble Cove Drive Ft. Myers, Florida 33905
Re: K143228
Trade/Device Name: Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OVD, MAX Dated: November 28, 2014 Received: December 01, 2014
Dear Dr. Jansen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
1
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K143228
Device Name Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The device must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., lateral plating or pedicle screw systems), which is in addition to the integrated locking plates provided in the system. When used with the integrated locking plates, it is indicated to be used at one level from L2-L5. When used without the integrated locking plates, it is indicated to be used at one or two contiguous levels, from L2-S1. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) SUMMARY
Frontier Medical's Ancora Lateral Locking Cage (LLC) Interbody Fusion Device
Date: | February 24, 2015 |
---|---|
Submitter: | Frontier Medical, LLC |
512 Fourth Street | |
Gwinn, MI 49841 | |
906-232-1200 | |
Contact Person: | Rich Jansen, Pharm. D. |
Silver Pine Consulting | |
612-281-5505 | |
Name: | Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device |
Product Class: | Class II |
Classification: | 21 CFR §888.3080 (Intervertebral body fusion device) |
Product Codes: | MAX, OVD |
Panel Code: | 87 |
Common or Usual Name: | Intervertebral body fusion device |
Predicate Devices
The Ancora LLC was shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. The primary predicate device is the Ancora LLC (K112700). Additional predicate devices are the CoRoent XL-F Device (K140479), and the BAK Device (P950002).
Device Description
The Ancora system consists of different footprints and heights to provide options that correlate best to an individual's anatomy and pathology. The system offers optional integrated locking plates with corresponding locking pins. Implantable components are manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI) per ASTM F136 and PEEK Optima LT1 per ASTM F2026 with tantalum markers per ASTM F560. Supplemental anterior and/or posterior fixation is intended for use with the device to ensure stability of the spine.
The purpose of this submission is to add implant configurations to the Ancora LLC line of implants, and modify the indications for use so the locking plates are optional fixation devices. Surgical Instruments are also available for use with the system.
Indications for Use
The Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The device must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., lateral plating or pedicle screw systems), which is in addition to the integrated locking plates provided in the system. When used with the integrated locking plates, it is indicated to be used at one level from L2-L5. When used without the integrated locking
4
plates, it is indicated to be used at one or two contiguous levels, from L2-S1. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment with the devices. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.
Performance Data
Static and dynamic axial compression and static and dynamic compression shear were completed following ASTM F2077. Expulsion testing was conducted following a recognized protocol to allow comparison evaluation of intervertebral body fusion device assemblies, and characterize their resistance to expulsion. The above pre-clinical testing performed on the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device indicated that the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and is adequate for the intended use.
Technological Characteristics
The Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device and predicate devices have the same intended use, to provide mechanical stability in the lumbar disc space to facilitate biologic fusion. The indications for use of the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device are the same as the predicate devices. Moreover, the device is very similar in its size to the predicate devices. The materials used are also the same as in the predicate device. There are no significant differences in technological characteristics compared to the predicate devices, and the minor differences that do exist do not raise any new types of safety or efficacy issues. Furthermore, bench testing demonstrates that these differences do not adversely impact device performance.
Conclusion
Frontier Medical Devices concludes that the Ancora LLC Interbody Fusion Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.