(111 days)
Not Found
No
The description focuses on the mechanical design and intended use of a spinal implant, with no mention of AI or ML capabilities. The performance studies are mechanical tests, not related to algorithmic performance.
Yes
The device is an implant designed for spinal fusion procedures in patients with degenerative disc disease, which clearly indicates a therapeutic purpose to treat a medical condition.
No
The device is an implantable intervertebral body spinal fusion device, not a diagnostic tool. Its purpose is to facilitate spinal fusion and provide structural support, not to diagnose conditions.
No
The device description clearly describes a physical spinal implant made of titanium, not a software application.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the device is a spinal implant for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures. This is a surgical procedure performed in vivo (within the body).
- Device Description: The description details a physical implant designed to be placed within the spine.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of the device being used to examine specimens derived from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue, etc.) to provide information for diagnosis, monitoring, or compatibility testing.
IVD devices are used in vitro (outside the body) to analyze biological samples. This device is a surgical implant used in vivo.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior or transforaminal approach. The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
MAX
Device Description
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal implants have a hollow, slightly curved frame with areas of an open-pore titanium grid structure. Restoration of the intervertebral space can be achieved by the large selection of implants that, at the same time, offers a high degree of intraoperative flexibility. In addition to straight implants, the MOBIS®II ST cage is also available with a 5° lordotic angle. Due to its design, the implant can be aligned with the anterior curvature of the intervertebral body and so is suited for unilateral, dorsal access (TLIF) in the L2 to S1 region of the spine.
Materials:
Titanium alloy (Ti6AI4V) (ASTM F136)
Function:
Maintain adequate disc space until fusion occurs.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
L2-S1
Indicated Patient Age Range
skeletally mature patients
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The following tests were conducted:
- . Static and dynamic compression per ASTM F2077
- Static and dynamic compression-shear per ASTM F2077
- Subsidence per ASTM F2267
- Expulsion
The results of this testing indicate that the MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is equivalent to predicate devices.
No clinical studies were performed.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
MOBIS® Spinal Implant (K131372), T-PAL Spacer (K100089), Lucent Straight Cage (K071724/K081968)
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines above them that resemble a bird in flight. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the image.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 16, 2014
SIGNUS Medizintechnik GmbH % Mr. J.D. Webb The OrthoMedix Group, Incorporated 1001 Oakwood Boulevard Round Rock, Texas 78681
Re: K141405
Trade/Device Name: MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: June 12, 2014 Received: June 18, 2014
Dear Mr. Webb:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
1
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Ronald DAJean -S for
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: December 31, 2013
See PRA Statement on last page.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant
Indications for Use (Describe)
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior or transforaminal approach. The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
3
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
4
510(k) Summary for the MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 of the Federal Code of Regulations the following 510(k) summary is submitted for the MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant
GENERAL INFORMATION 1.
Date Prepared: | June 12, 2014 |
---|---|
Trade Name: | MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant |
Common Name: | Interbody spacer |
Classification Name: | Intervertebral body fusion device - lumbar |
Class: | II |
Product Code: | MAX |
CFR section: | 21 CFR section 888.3080 |
Device panel: | Orthopedic |
Legally Marketed | MOBIS® Spinal Implant (K131372) |
Predicate Device: | T-PAL Spacer (K100089) |
Lucent Straight Cage (K071724/K081968) | |
Submitter: | SIGNUS Medizintechnik GmbH |
Industriestrasse 2 | |
D - 63755 Alzenau | |
GERMANY | |
Joachim Schneider | |
+49(0)6023-9166-213 | |
Contact: | J.D. Webb |
1001 Oakwood Blvd | |
Round Rock, TX 78681 | |
e-mail: jdwebb@orthomedix.net |
2. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal implants have a hollow, slightly curved frame with areas of an open-pore titanium grid structure. Restoration of the intervertebral space can be achieved by the large selection of implants that, at the same time, offers a high degree of intraoperative flexibility. In addition to straight implants, the MOBIS®II ST cage is also available with a 5° lordotic angle. Due to its design, the implant can be aligned with the anterior curvature of the intervertebral body and so is suited for unilateral, dorsal access (TLIF) in the L2 to S1 region of the spine.
Materials:
Titanium alloy (Ti6AI4V) (ASTM F136)
Function:
Maintain adequate disc space until fusion occurs.
5
3. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE CLAIMED TO PREDICATE DEVICES
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of intended use, design, materials used, mechanical safety and performances.
4. INTENDED USE
The MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior or transforaminal approach. The MOBIS®I ST Spinal Implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
5. NON-CLINICAL TEST SUMMARY
The following tests were conducted:
- . Static and dynamic compression per ASTM F2077
- Static and dynamic compression-shear per ASTM F2077 ●
- Subsidence per ASTM F2267 ●
- Expulsion ●
The results of this testing indicate that the MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant is equivalent to predicate devices.
CLINICAL TEST SUMMARY 6.
No clinical studies were performed
7. CONCLUSIONS NONCLINICAL AND CLINICAL
SIGNUS Medizintechnik considers MOBIS®II ST Spinal Implant to be equivalent to the predicate devices listed in section 1. 'General Information'. This conclusion is based upon the device's similarities in principles of operation, technology, materials and indications for use.