(29 days)
Not Found
No
The document describes a digital X-ray detector and its image processing capabilities, but there is no mention of AI, ML, or any related technologies in the intended use, device description, or performance studies. The image processing mentioned is standard for digital radiography.
No
The device is an X-ray detector used for diagnostic imaging, not for treating diseases or conditions.
Yes
The device is an X-ray detector used in general purpose diagnostic procedures for human anatomy, and its output is used for radiographic diagnosis and analysis.
No
The device description explicitly states it is a "digital solid state X-ray detector that is based on flat-panel technology" and "consists of a scintillator coupled to an a-Si TFT sensor," indicating it is a hardware device. While it involves image processing, it is not solely software.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states it's for "general radiographic system for human anatomy" and "general purpose diagnostic procedures." This involves imaging the human body directly, not testing samples taken from the body.
- Device Description: The description details an X-ray detector that captures and digitalizes X-ray images. This is a medical imaging device, not a device used for in vitro testing.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.), reagents, or any other components typically associated with in vitro diagnostics.
The device is a medical imaging device used for diagnostic radiography, which is distinct from in vitro diagnostics.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
1717G Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector is indical imaging solution designed for general radiographic system for human anatomy. It is intended to replace film or screen based radiographic systems in all general purpose diagnostic procedures. Not to be used for mammography.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
MQB
Device Description
1717G is a digital solid state X-ray detector that is based on flat-panel technology. This radiographic image detector and processing unit consists of a scintillator coupled to an a-Si TFT sensor. This device needs to be integrated with a radiographic imaging system. It can be utilized to capture and digitalize X-ray images for radiographic diagnosis The RAW files can be further processed as DICOM compatible image files by separate console SW (not part of this 510k submission) for a radiographic diagnosis and analysis.
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
X-ray
Anatomical Site
human anatomy
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The 1717G flat panel detector is a modified version of 1717SGC (K122182), FDA cleared predicate device from Rayence. Indications for use, material, form factor, performance, and safety characteristics between 1717G and 1717SGC are identical. The non-clinical test report and clinical consideration report were prepared and submitted to FDA separately to demonstrate the substantial equivalency between two similar detectors. The non-clinical test report contains the MTF, DQE and NPS test results of 1717G and 1717SGC by using the identical test equipment and same analysis method described by IEC 62220-1. The comparison of the MTF for 1717G and 1717SGC detector demonstrated that the MTF of the 1717SGC detector performed almost same with 1717G. Therefore, the overall resolution performance and sharpness of 1717G is almost same with 1717SGC. The DQE represents the ability to visualize object details of a certain size and contrast. 1717G demonstrated higher DQE performance than 1717SGC at various spatial frequencies and provides almost same Signal-to Noise Ratio (SNR) transfer from the input to the output of a detector as a function of frequency. At the lowest spatial frequency, 1717G has a DQE of 46% and that of 1717SGC is 45%. 1717G also exhibited NPS which has almost same performance with 1717SGC. Therefore, the image quality of 1717G is found to be substantially equivalent to 1717SGC at the same patient exposure.
To further demonstrate the substantial equivalency of two devices, clinical images are taken from both devices and reviewed by a licensed US radiologist to render an expert opinion. Both the test subject (1717G) and control group (1717SGC) are evaluated and compared by taking sample radiographs of similar age groups and anatomical structures in accordance with the test protocol of diagnostic radiography evaluation procedure.
Based on the non-clinical and clinical consideration test and the outcome of a comparative review by an expert for both devices, we can claim the substantial equivalency between 1717G and its predicate device, 1717SGC in terms of image quality.
After comparing a broad review of plain radiographic images taken with the 1717G and the 1717SGC, the images obtained with the 1717G are comparable or superior to the same view obtained from a similar patient with the 1717SGC. In general, both the spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast are superior using the 1717G. Specifically, the soft tissues on extremity films were seen with better clarity. There is no difficulty in evaluating a wide range of anatomic structures necessary to provide a correct conclusion.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Date 510k summary prepared: March 7, 2014
Submitter's Name, address, telephone number, a contact person:
| Submitter's Name : | Rayence Co., Ltd. |
|---|---|
| Submitter's Address: | 14, Samsung 1-ro 1-gil, Hwaseong-si. Gyeonggi-do, Korea |
| Submitter's Telephone: | +82-31-8015-6459 |
| Contact person: | Mr. Kee Dock Kim / Manager / +82-31-8015-6459 |
| Official Correspondent: | Dave Kim (davekim@mtech-inc.net) |
| (U.S. Designated agent) | |
| Address: | 8310 Buffalo Speedway, Houston, TX 77025 |
| Telephone: | +713-467-2607 |
| Fax: | +713-583-8988 |
Name of the device, including the trade or proprietary name if applicable, the common or usual name and the classification name, if known:
| Trade/proprietary name: | 1717G |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Digital Flat Panel X-ray Detector |
| Classification Name : | 21CFR892.1680 / Stationary x-ray system |
| Product Code: | MQB |
2
. . .
1
Predicate Device :
| Manufacturer | : Rayence Co., Ltd. |
|---|---|
| Device | : 1717SGC |
| 510(k) Number | : K122182 (Decision Date – AUG. 16. 2012) |
Device Description :
1717G is a digital solid state X-ray detector that is based on flat-panel technology. This radiographic image detector and processing unit consists of a scintillator coupled to an a-Si TFT sensor. This device needs to be integrated with a radiographic imaging system. It can be utilized to capture and digitalize X-ray images for radiographic diagnosis The RAW files can be further processed as DICOM compatible image files by separate console SW (not part of this 510k submission) for a radiographic diagnosis and analysis.
Indication for use :
1717G Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector is indicated for digital imaging solution designed for general radiographic system for human anatomy. It is intended to replace film or screen based radiographic systems in all general purpose diagnostic procedures. Not to be used for mammography.
1. Summary of Design Control Risk management
The 1717G digital X-ray detector is a modification of 1717SGC (K122182). 1717G was developed for the purpose of retrofitting the stationary X-ray system with a film detector. 1717G is slightly larger and heavier than 1717 SGC, the predecessor.
The risks and the hazardous impact of the device modification were analyzed with FMEA method. The specific risk control and protective measures to mitigate the risks from the modification were reviewed and implemented in the new product design phase. The overall assessment concluded that all risks and hazardous conditions identified arising from the design change were successfully mitigated and accepted.
2. Summary of the technological characteristics of the device compared to the predicate device:
The 1717G SSXI detector described in this 510(k) has the same indications for use and similar technical characteristics as its predicate device, 1717SGC flat panel detector, of Rayence Co., Ltd.
2
The same hardware is used for 1717G and 1717SGC, and the hardware is eivided into the main board, Gate board and ROIC board.
| 1717G | 1717SGC | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Name | RP002A | |||||||||||||
| Description | Image: Power supply unit | |||||||||||||
| No Description ① Power connector for detector operating |
------ Direct current ② Light up at 5V operating in power supply ③ 110V / 220V select switch - 110V or 220V select (Within 100-120V, 220-240V range) ④ Input Power on / Power off by main power switch
Connect with AC power supply cord ⑤ ------ Direct current
Image: Protective Earth (Ground) | | | | | | | | | | | | | The power supply unit is not provided from Rayence. |
| Manufacturer | Rayence Co., Ltd. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dimension | 290 x 245 x 68 mm | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weight | 4 kg | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1717G requires power supply (Model Name: RP002A)
3
| | 100-120/220-240 V~, 50/60 Hz, 50 VA
The main power fuse is a 3.15A, 250V~
Type T fuse | * Use CE or UL
approved product | | | |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|---------|------|-----|
| | Supply power | Output Current | Min | Max | |
| Power
requirements | DC5.5V | 0.5A | | | |
| | DC5.5V | 0.1 A | Voltage | 18V | 24V |
| | DC12V | 2A | Current | 1.9A | - |
| | DC24V | 8A | | | |
| | DC-8V | 0.01A | | | |
| | AC100Vrms(400Hz) | 0.25A | | | |
The 1717G flat panel detector is equipped with a dedicated power supply (Model Name: RP002A). The electromagnetic compatibility test for the new device with the power supply has been conducted and the test report is included in this submission. The risk factors associated with the power supply such as power overload and overheating have been assessed and control measures to mitigate risks are discussed.
3. Summary of Performance Testing
:
The 1717G flat panel detector is a modified version of 1717SGC (K122182), FDA cleared predicate device from Rayence. Indications for use, material, form factor, performance, and safety characteristics between 1717G and 1717SGC are identical. The non-clinical test report and clinical consideration report were prepared and submitted to FDA separately to demonstrate the substantial equivalency between two similar detectors. The non-clinical test report contains the MTF, DQE and NPS test results of 1717G and 1717SGC by using the identical test equipment and same analysis method described by IEC 62220-1. The comparison of the MTF for 1717G and 1717SGC detector demonstrated that the MTF of the 1717SGC detector performed almost same with 1717G. Therefore, the overall resolution performance and sharpness of 1717G is almost same with 1717SGC. The DQE represents the ability to visualize object details of a certain size and contrast. 1717G demonstrated higher DQE performance than 1717SGC at various spatial frequencies and provides almost same Signal-to Noise Ratio (SNR) transfer from the input to the output of a detector as a function of frequency. At the lowest spatial frequency, 1717G has a DQE of 46% and that of 1717SGC is 45%. 1717G also exhibited NPS which has almost same performance with 1717SGC. Therefore, the image quality of 1717G is found to be substantially equivalent to 1717SGC at the same patient exposure.
4
K140646
Page 6 of 6
To further demonstrate the substantial equivalency of two devices, clinical images are taken from both devices and reviewed by a licensed US radiologist to render an expert opinion. Both the test subject (1717G) and control group (1717SGC) are evaluated and compared by taking sample radiographs of similar age groups and anatomical structures in accordance with the test protocol of diagnostic radiography evaluation procedure.
Based on the non-clinical and clinical consideration test and the outcome of a comparative review by an expert for both devices, we can claim the substantial equivalency between 1717G and its predicate device, 1717SGC in terms of image quality.
After comparing a broad review of plain radiographic images taken with the 1717G and the 1717SGC, the images obtained with the 1717G are comparable or superior to the same view obtained from a similar patient with the 1717SGC. In general, both the spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast are superior using the 1717G. Specifically, the soft tissues on extremity films were seen with better clarity. There is no difficulty in evaluating a wide range of anatomic structures necessary to provide a correct conclusion.
The manufacturing facility is in conformance with the design control procedure requirements and the relevant EPRC standards as specified in 21 CFR 802.30 and the records are available for review.
4. Summary for any testing in the submission:
Electrical, mechanical, environmental safety and performance testing according to standard IEC 60601-1: 2005 + CORR.1(2006) + CORR(2007) (Medical electrical equipment Part 1:General requirements for basic safety and essential performance) was performed, and EMC testing were conducted in accordance with standard IEC 60601-1-2:2007.
Non-clinical & Clinical considerations according to FDA Guidance "Guidance for the Submissions of 510(k)'s for Solid State X-ray Imaging Devices" was performed. All test results were satisfactory.
5. Conclusions:
In accordance with the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807 and based on the information provided in this premarket notification Rayence Co., Ltd. concludes that 1717G is safe and effective and substantially equivalent in comparison with 1717SGC, the predicate device as described herein.
5
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows a circular seal with text around the perimeter and a symbol in the center. The text reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA". The symbol in the center consists of three stylized lines above three wavy lines.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 11, 2014
Rayence Co., Ltd. % Mr. Dave Kim Medical Device Regulatory Affairs Mtech Group 8310 Buffalo Speedway HOUSTON TX 77025
Re: K140646
Trade/Device Name: Digital Flat Panel X-ray Detector / 1717G, Xmaru1717G Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MQB Dated: March 7, 2014 Received: March 13, 2014
Dear Mr. Kim:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
6
Page 2-Mr. Kim
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Sm.h.7)
Janine M. Morris Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
for
Enclosure
7
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: December 31, 2013 See PRA Statement on last page.
510(k) Number (if known)
K140646
Device Name l 717G Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector
Indications for Use (Describe)
1717G Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector is indical imaging solution designed for general radiographic system for human anatomy. It is intended to replace film or screen based radiographic systems in all general purpose diagnostic procedures. Not to be used for mammography.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[x] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
O Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signalure)
FORM FDA 3881 (6/13)
PSC Publishing Services (DC1) +11-6741 EF