(274 days)
Not Found
No
The device description and performance studies focus on the physical properties and biocompatibility of a silicone punctal plug, with no mention of AI or ML.
Yes
The device is intended to reduce or eliminate tear drainage to treat dry eye syndromes, indicating a therapeutic purpose.
No
Explanation: The device description states its purpose is to reduce or eliminate tear drainage to maintain lubricating tears on the eye's surface, which is a treatment for dry eye, not a diagnostic function. There is no mention of it detecting, identifying, or analyzing a medical condition.
No
The device description clearly states it is a physical punctal plug made of silicone and includes a physical inserter made of ABS and stainless steel. It is a hardware medical device.
No, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are medical devices used to perform tests on samples taken from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information about a person's health. These tests are performed outside of the body (in vitro).
- VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug Function: The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is a physical device inserted into the puncta of the eye to reduce tear drainage. It is a therapeutic device, not a diagnostic one. It does not perform any tests on bodily samples to diagnose a condition.
The description clearly indicates it's a physical implant for treating dry eye syndrome by altering tear flow, which is a therapeutic intervention, not a diagnostic one.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is for use in patients with dry eye syndromes.
Product codes
LZU
Device Description
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is designed to provide reduction or elimination of tear drainage through the inferior or superior puncta, thus maintaining lubricating tears on the surface of the eye. Each VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is molded from medical grade silicone. The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is available in 3 sizes (small, medium, and large) and is packaged 2 per/box. Each plug is sterile and preloaded on an inserter.
The inserter is manufactured using medical grade ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), and 304 stainless steel.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
puncta (inferior or superior)
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Prescription Use
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies
Non-Clinical Tests:
The non-clinical testing performed on the Lacrivera VeraPlug™ included sterility testing which was completed via a validated ETO (Ethylene oxide) sterilization cycle and bench testing that included a simulated implantation stretch test. Biocompatibility testing for the plug was determined to be unnecessary as the material utilized in the plug, medical grade silicone, has a long standing history of being biocompatible for use for the manufacture of punctal occluders. The processes utilized by manufacturers in the forming of the plug are also common throughout the industry.
Key Results: Safety and performance testing was performed on the sterilization method, ethylene oxide residuals, microorganisms on the product and postaccelerated aging package validation. The results of which have demonstrated that the device does not introduce significant questions of safety or effectiveness.
Key Metrics
Stretch Test Comparison Study Results: Passed
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
N/A
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized graphic of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines connecting them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 13, 2014
Krishna Imports Inc. Dba Stephens Instruments c/o Ms. Archna Johnson Vice President 2500 Sandersville Rd. Lexington, KY 40511
Re: K140352
Trade/Device Name: VeraPlug" Punctal Plug Regulation Number: Preamendment Regulation Name: Preamendment Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: LZU Dated: October 3, 2014 Received: October 6, 2014
Dear Ms. Johnson,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
1
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Kesia Y. Alexander -S
for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K140352
Device Name VeraPlug
Indications for Use (Describe)
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is for use in patients with dry eye syndromes.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[X] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
69
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
3
Date Prepared | November 5, 2014 |
---|---|
510K #: | K140352 |
Applicant: | Krishna Imports Inc dba Stephens Instruments |
2500 Sandersville Rd. | |
Lexington, KY 40511 | |
Contact Person: | Archna Johnson |
Phone No.: | 855-857-0518, 859-259-4926 (fax) |
Device Name: | VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug (Punctal Occluder) |
Common/Usual Name: | Plug, Punctum |
Type of Submission: | Traditional, Original |
Product Code: | LZU |
Regulatory Class: | Unclassified |
Indications for Use:
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is for use in patients with dry eye syndromes.
Device Description:
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is designed to provide reduction or elimination of tear drainage through the inferior or superior puncta, thus maintaining lubricating tears on the surface of the eye. Each VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is molded from medical grade silicone. The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug is available in 3 sizes (small, medium, and large) and is packaged 2 per/box. Each plug is sterile and preloaded on an inserter.
The inserter is manufactured using medical grade ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), and 304 stainless steel.
Predicate Devices/Substantial Equivalence:
The Lacrivera VeraPlug™ is equivalent to the predicate device listed below:
Predicate Device:
Odyssey Medical
Punctal Occluder (#K972523)
4
Predicate product Comparison Table
Parameter | Stephens Instruments | Odyssey Medical | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
510(k) | |||
Number | K140352 | K972523 | |
Indications for | |||
Use | The VeraPlug™ | ||
Punctal Plug is for use | |||
in patients with dry eye | |||
syndromes. | Punctal Occluders (plugs) are indicated for the | ||
treatment of "dry eye" syndrome. Dry eye being | |||
a condition where there is sufficient lubrication in | |||
the eye and the conjunctive becomes much less | |||
moist than normal. This produces pain and | |||
discomfort in the eyes. This may occur in any | |||
condition that causes scars of the cornea, such as | |||
erythema multiforme, trachoma, or corneal burns, | |||
etc. Other patients that may benefit are: cataract | |||
patients, patiens with arthritis, patients medicated | |||
for hypertension, contact wearers of any age, | |||
seasonal allergy sufferers, patients who liver in | |||
dry climates, or spend extended periods in air | |||
conditioning, and any others who suffer from dry | |||
eye irritatio. Treatment is to stop tear outflow via | |||
a specific punctum to enhance tear contact time | |||
in certain dry eye conditions. It is also reasonable | |||
that eyes drops of many kinds would be more | |||
effective if retained on the surface of the eye, | |||
rather than drained into the sinus. | Both are intended | ||
for use with | |||
patients suffering | |||
from dry eye | |||
syndromes | |||
Shape Design | Image: [shape design] | Image: [shape design] | Plugs are |
comparable in nose | |||
diameter, overall | |||
length, and shape | |||
design | |||
Material | Medical Grade Silicone | Medical Grade Silicone | Same |
Sterile | Yes | Yes | Same |
Nose | |||
Diameter | |||
Small | 0.76mm | 0.75mm | Within cleared |
Medium | 0.89mm | 0.88mm | nose diameter |
ranges | |||
Large | 1.02mm | 1.01mm | |
Overall | |||
Length | |||
Small | 1.65mm | 1.63mm | |
Medium | 1.83mm | 1.80mm | Within cleared |
overall length | |||
ranges | |||
Large | 2.00mm | 1.93mm | |
Stretch Test | |||
Comparison | |||
Study Results | Passed | Passed | Same |
Patient | |||
Population | Patients suffering from | ||
dry eye syndromes | Patients suffering from dry eye symptoms | Same |
5
Discussion of Technological Characteristics
The VeraPlug™ Punctal Plug and the predicate device are both intended for use with patients suffering from dry eye syndromes. There are slight design differences between the Odyssey and Stephens Instruments punctal plugs. Both have a similar design shape with a conical shaped nose (distal end), a shaft, and a dome shaped proximal end, with comparable nose diameters and overall lengths. Both are manufactured of medical grade silicone and packaged 2 per/box. Each plug is sterile, preloaded on an inserter.
Non-Clinical Tests
The non-clinical testing performed on the Lacrivera VeraPlug™ included sterility testing which was completed via a validated ETO (Ethylene oxide) sterilization cycle and bench testing that included a simulated implantation stretch test. Biocompatibility testing for the plug was determined to be unnecessary as the material utilized in the plug, medical grade silicone, has a long standing history of being biocompatible for use for the manufacture of punctal occluders. The processes utilized by manufacturers in the forming of the plug are also common throughout the industry.
Standards utilized for testing include:
- . ISO 11135-1:2007 Sterilization of Health Care Products – Ethylene Oxide – Part 1: Requirements for the Development, Validation, and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for medical devices
- . ISO 11737-1:2006 Sterilization of Medical Devices – Microbiological Methods Part 1: Determination of the Population of Microorganisms on Product (Bioburden Testing)
- ASTM F-1980-07 Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical . Devices
- ISO 11607-1 ISO Packaging for Terminally Sterilized Medical Devices – Part 1: Requirements for Materials, Sterile Barrier Systems and Packaging Systems (Bubble Test, Dye Penetration)
- . ISO 11607-2 Packaging for terminally Sterilized medical Devices – Part 2: Validation Requirements for Forming, Sealing and Assembly Processes
- . ISO 10993-7:2008 Biological Evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene Oxide Sterilization residuals (ETO Residuals)
Conclusion
The Lacrivera VeraPlug™ is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in intended use, material, design and device specifications. Safety and performance testing was performed on the sterilization method, ethylene oxide residuals, microorganisms on the product and postaccelerated aging package validation. The results of which have demonstrated that the device
6
does not introduce significant questions of safety or effectiveness and therefore, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.