K Number
K133366
Device Name
ORTHROS POSTERIOR STABILIZATION SYSTEM
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2014-04-08

(158 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3070
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP Authorized
Intended Use
Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral/iliac spine (T1-S1/Ilium): degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended for treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft, having implants attached to the lumbosacral spine and/or ilium with removal of the implants after attainment of a solid fusion. Levels of pedicle screw fixation for these patients are L3-sacrum/ilium.
Device Description
Orthros Posterior Stabilization System consist of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, monoaxial screws, polyaxial screws, locking caps and associated manual surgical instruments. Implant components can be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations for the individual patient and surgical condition. Polyaxial screws are intended for posterior and anterior use. Rods and monoaxial screws may be used anteriorly or posteriorly. Locking caps and locking set screws are used to connect screws to the rod. The rods are composed of titanium alloy, as specified in ASTM F136. All other implants are composed of titanium alloy, as specified in ASTM F136.
More Information

Not Found

No
The device description focuses on mechanical components (rods, screws, caps) and manual surgical instruments. There is no mention of software, algorithms, image processing, or any terms related to AI/ML. The performance studies are non-clinical mechanical tests.

Yes
The device is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of various acute and chronic instabilities or deformities, which are therapeutic functions.

No
The Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion, which is a therapeutic function, not a diagnostic one.

No

The device description explicitly states it consists of physical components like rods, screws, locking caps, and surgical instruments, all made of titanium alloy. This indicates it is a hardware-based medical device, not software-only.

Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).

Here's why:

  • Intended Use: The intended use clearly describes a surgical implant system for stabilizing the spine. This is a therapeutic device, not a diagnostic one.
  • Device Description: The description details physical components like rods, screws, and caps, which are used in surgery.
  • Lack of Diagnostic Elements: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.) or providing diagnostic information about a patient's condition.
  • Performance Studies: The performance studies focus on the mechanical properties of the implant (compression, torsion, pullout), which are relevant to a surgical device's function, not a diagnostic test's accuracy.

IVD devices are used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for diagnostic, monitoring, or compatibility purposes. This device does not fit that description.

N/A

Intended Use / Indications for Use

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral/iliac spine (T1-S1/Ilium): degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

In addition, Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended for treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft, having implants attached to the lumbosacral spine and/or ilium with removal of the implants after attainment of a solid fusion. Levels of pedicle screw fixation for these patients are L3-sacrum/ilium.

Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)

NKB, MNI, MNH, KWQ

Device Description

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System consist of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, monoaxial screws, polyaxial screws, locking caps and associated manual surgical instruments. Implant components can be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations for the individual patient and surgical condition. Polyaxial screws are intended for posterior and anterior use. Rods and monoaxial screws may be used anteriorly or posteriorly. Locking caps and locking set screws are used to connect screws to the rod. The rods are composed of titanium alloy, as specified in ASTM F136. All other implants are composed of titanium alloy, as specified in ASTM F136.

Mentions image processing

Not Found

Mentions AI, DNN, or ML

Not Found

Input Imaging Modality

Not Found

Anatomical Site

thoracic, lumbar, and sacral/iliac spine (T1-S1/Ilium), L5-S1 vertebra, lumbosacral spine and/or ilium, L3-sacrum/ilium

Indicated Patient Age Range

skeletally mature patients

Intended User / Care Setting

Not Found

Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)

The following tests were performed to demonstrate that the Orthros Posterior Stabilization System System is substantially equivalent to other predicate devices. Static Axial Compression Bend Test per ASTM F1717-13 Static Axial Torsion Test per ASTM F1717-13 Dynamic Axial Compression Bend Test per ASTM F1717-13 Screw Pullout Testing per ASTM F543-07 The results of these studies showed that the Orthros Posterior Stabilization System met the acceptance criteria.

Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)

Not Found

Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.

Corelink Tiger Spine System (K121728), Globus Medical Revere Stabilization System (K061202), Globus Medical Creo Stabilization System (K124058), Medtronic CD Horizon Legacy 4.5mm System (K113395) and Synthes Pagea Monoaxial System (K052151)

Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.

Not Found

Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).

Not Found

§ 888.3070 Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system.

(a)
Identification. (1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.

0

K133366 - Page 1 of 4

Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image is a logo for Camber Spine Technologies. The logo consists of a stylized letter "C" in a black square on the left, and the words "Camber Spine Technologies" on the right. The words "Camber" and "Spine" are stacked on top of each other, and the word "Technologies" is below them.

510(k) Summary Traditional 510k

as required by section 807.92(c).

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System K133366 Prepared 3/5/14

Submitter:Camber Spine
90 S. Newtown Street Rd., Suite #10
Newtown Square, PA 19073
Contact PersonDan Pontecorvo
President
Phone: 484-420-4219, Fax: (484) 318-8031
Email: delvalsyn@comcast.net
Trade NameOrthros Posterior Stabilization System
Common NamePedicle Screw System
Device ClassClass III
Classification Name
and NumberOrthosis, Spondylolistheses Spinal System , 21 CFR 888.3070
Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation, 21 CFR 888.3070
Classification Panel:Orthopedic
Product CodeNKB , MNI , MNH, KWQ
Reason for 510kNew Device
Predicate DevicesCorelink Tiger Spine System (K121728), Globus Medical Revere
Stabilization System (K061202), Globus Medical Creo Stabilization
System (K124058), Medtronic CD Horizon Legacy 4.5mm System
(K113395) and Synthes Pagea Monoaxial System (K052151)
Device DescriptionOrthros Posterior Stabilization System consist of a variety of shapes
and sizes of rods, monoaxial screws, polyaxial screws, locking caps
and associated manual surgical instruments. Implant components can
be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations for the individual
patient and surgical condition. Polyaxial screws are intended for
posterior and anterior use. Rods and monoaxial screws may be used
anteriorly or posteriorly. Locking caps and locking set screws are used
to connect screws to the rod. The rods are composed of titanium
alloy, as specified in ASTM F136. All other implants are composed of
titanium alloy, as specified in ASTM F136.
Intended UseOrthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended to provide
immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally
mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the
following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic,
lumbar, and sacral/iliac spine (T1-S1/Ilium): degenerative disc disease
(defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of disc confirmed
by history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis
with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture,
dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous
fusion (pseudarthrosis).
In addition, Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended for
treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1
vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous
bone graft, having implants attached to the lumbosacral spine and/or
ilium with removal of the implants after attainment of a solid fusion.
Levels of pedicle screw fixation for these patients are L3-
sacrum/ilium.
Materials:All implants are manufactured out of Titanium Alloy, specifically TAV-
per ASTM F136. Supporting instrumentation is manufactured out of
medical grade Stainless Steels including: 303, 17-4, 420, 455 & 465
alloys. Aluminum, specifically 6061-T2 is also used on some
instruments.

1

2

K133366 - Page 3 of 4

·

1

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System and its predicate devices have the
Statement ofsame indications for use, similar design, principles of operation and test
Technologicalresults. Both devices are manufactured using materials with a long
Comparisonhistory of use in orthopedic implants.

| Nonclinical Test
Summary | The following tests were performed to demonstrate that the Orthros Posterior
Stabilization System
System is substantially equivalent to other predicate devices.
Static Axial Compression Bend Test per ASTM F1717-13 Static Axial Torsion Test per ASTM F1717-13 Dynamic Axial Compression Bend Test per ASTM F1717-13 Screw Pullout Testing per ASTM F543-07 The results of these studies showed that the Orthros Posterior Stabilization System met
the acceptance criteria. |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical Test
Summary | No clinical tests were performed. |

3

and the control of the country of

Sterilization Information
ImplantsThe Implant will be shipped non-sterile and will be autoclaveable, validation testing of
the process was conducted (using the half-cycle method) to a Sterility Assurance Level
(SAL) of 10-6 per ISO 17665.
Instruments and
CaseThe instrument and case will be shipped non-sterile and will be autoclaveable,
validation testing of the process was conducted (using the half-cycle method) to a
Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 per ISO 17665.
ConclusionThe Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is substantially equivalent to its predicate devices. This conclusion is based upon the fact the Orthros Posterior Stabilization System and its predicate devices have the same indications for use, have a similar design, principles of operation and technical characteristics, similar test results, and any differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1. September 2017 11:40

4

Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the department's name around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an image of an eagle.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

April 8, 2014

Camber Spine Technologies Mr. Daniel A. Pontecorvo President 90 South Newton Street Road, Suite 10 Newton Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Re: K133366

Trade/Device Name: Orthros Posterior Stabilization System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Pedicle screw spinal system Regulatory Class: Class III Product Code: NKB, MNI, MNH, KWO Dated: March 6, 2014 Received: March 7, 2014

Dear Mr. Pontecorvo:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

5

Page 2 - Mr. Daniel A. Pontecorvo

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours,

Ronald P. Jean -S for

Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

6

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K133366

Device Name

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System

Indications for Use (Describe)

Orthros Posterior Stabilization System is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral/iliac spine (TI-S1/Ilium): degenerative discogenic back pain with degeneration of disconfirmed by history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

In addition, Orthros Posterior System is intended for treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the LS-SI vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft, having implants attached to the lumbosacral spine and/or ilium with removal of the implants after attainment of a solid fusion. Levels of pedicle screw fixation for these patients are L3-sacrum/ilium.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -- CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR MARK

Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signalure)

2014.04.07 15

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.