K Number
K132593
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2013-09-17

(29 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
886.4300
Panel
OP
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Crystalsert Delivery System is intended to be used to fold and deliver the Crystalens accommodating intraocular lens and other intraocular lens identifying the Crystalsert Delivery System in their approved labeling.

Device Description

The Crystalsert Delivery System is a device used for folding and delivering the Crystalens accommodating intraocular lens (AT-52SE, AT-50SE, HD520, HD500, AT50AO, AT52AO), Trulign™ Toric, and other IOLs indicating use of the Crystalsert Delivery System in their approved labeling into the eye. The Crystalsert Delivery System consists of a syringe shaped body and tip with a plunger and drawer. The Crystalsert Delivery System is a sterile, disposable plastic device, with a small tubular pathway in which the lens can be placed into the eye with one continuous motion, designed for single use only.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document describes the Bausch & Lomb Crystalsert Delivery System, an intraocular lens guide. It outlines the device's description, indications for use, and a comparison to a predicate device. However, the document does not contain a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the format typically expected for clinical or performance studies with quantitative results.

Instead, the submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device (K123736, Crystalsert Delivery System) based on similar indications for use, contraindications, materials, single-use nature, sterility, sterilization method, sterility assurance level, and shelf life.

The "Brief Summary of Nonclinical Test and Results" section states: "The Crystalsert Delivery System has successfully undergone functional and biocompatibility testing and was found in conformance with the requirements set forth in respective standards." However, it does not provide specific acceptance criteria or the reported device performance from these tests. The details of these tests (e.g., sample sizes, methodology, and quantitative results) are not included in this summary document.

Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study demonstrating the device meets these criteria cannot be extracted from the provided text.

Here's an attempt to answer the questions based only on the information available in the provided text, with explicit notes where information is missing:


1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not provide a table of explicit, quantified acceptance criteria with corresponding performance data from a specific study. Instead, it relies on demonstrating equivalence to a predicate device by matching various characteristics.

CharacteristicPredicate (Acceptance Basis - assumed "meets predicate")Proposed Device Performance (Reported as equivalent)
Indications for useThe Crystalsert Delivery System is intended to be used to fold and deliver the Crystalens accommodating intraocular lens and other intraocular lenses identifying the Crystalsert Delivery System in their approved labeling.The Crystalsert Delivery System is intended to be used to fold and deliver the Crystalens accommodating intraocular lens and other intraocular lenses identifying the Crystalsert Delivery System in their approved labeling.
ContraindicationsNoneNone
MaterialsBody, drawer, plunger: polypropylene; Spring: stainless steelBody, drawer, plunger: polypropylene; Spring: stainless steel
Single useSingle useSingle use
SterileSterileSterile
How sterilizedEthylene oxideEthylene oxide
Sterility assurance level10-610-6
Shelf life12 months12 months
Functional and biocompatibility testing"successfully undergone functional and biocompatibility testing and was found in conformance with the requirements set forth in respective standards." (Specific criteria and results not provided)"successfully undergone functional and biocompatibility testing and was found in conformance with the requirements set forth in respective standards." (Specific criteria and results not provided)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

  • Sample Size: Not specified in the provided summary.
  • Data Provenance: Not specified in the provided summary. The summary only states that "functional and biocompatibility testing" was performed.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

This information is not applicable and not provided. The document describes a medical device (an IOL delivery system), and the testing mentioned (functional, biocompatibility) typically involves engineering and laboratory assessments against standards, rather than expert-derived ground truth as might be seen in diagnostic AI.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

Not applicable and not provided, as the tests mentioned are functional and biocompatibility, not expert-based assessment requiring adjudication.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This device is a delivery system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This device is a physical delivery system, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

For the functional and biocompatibility testing, the "ground truth" would be adherence to established industry standards or internal specifications for mechanical performance and biological safety. The specific standards or specifications are not detailed in this summary.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This device is a physical product, not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This device is a physical product, not an AI algorithm.

§ 886.4300 Intraocular lens guide.

(a)
Identification. An intraocular lens guide is a device intended to be inserted into the eye during surgery to direct the insertion of an intraocular lens and be removed after insertion is completed.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). Except when used as folders or injectors for soft or foldable intraocular lenses, the device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 886.9.