(126 days)
Not Found
No
The device is a sterilization tray and the description focuses on its physical properties and compatibility with sterilization cycles, with no mention of AI/ML.
No.
The device is a sterilization tray intended to encase and protect reusable battery packs and generators of a surgical system during sterilization and storage; it is not used for therapy.
No
Explanation: The device is a sterilization tray used to encase and protect other medical devices (battery packs and generators) during sterilization and storage. Its function is to facilitate the sterilization process, not to diagnose any condition or disease.
No
The device is a physical sterilization tray made of polysulfone and silicone, designed to hold and protect hardware components (generators and battery packs) during sterilization. It is not software.
Based on the provided information, the Sonicision Sterilization Tray is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is to encase and protect reusable battery packs and generators of the Sonicision system during sterilization and storage. This is a function related to the reprocessing and maintenance of a surgical device, not for the examination of specimens derived from the human body for the purpose of providing information for diagnosis, monitoring, or compatibility testing.
- Device Description: The description details a tray designed to hold and protect components during sterilization. It does not mention any components or functions related to analyzing biological samples.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies focus on sterilization efficacy, sterilant residuals, use life, biocompatibility, and mechanical performance. These are all relevant to the safety and effectiveness of a sterilization tray, not to the performance of an IVD test.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, providing diagnostic information, or any of the typical characteristics associated with IVD devices.
Therefore, the Sonicision Sterilization Tray is a medical device used in the reprocessing of other medical devices, but it does not fit the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Sonicision Sterilization Tray is intended to be used to encase and protect reusable battery packs and generators of the Sonicision system during sterilization and storage. The tray containing up to one generator and one battery pack (maximum load) can be used with the following models and pre-set (non-adjustable) cycles.
| Model | Cycle |
|---|---|
| STERRAD® 100S | Standard |
| STERRAD® NX® | Standard |
| STERRAD® 100NX® | Standard |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 Plus | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® maX | Lumen |
Maintenance of sterility of the content within the tray is based on demonstrated performance of the sterilization wrap or pouch used to encase the tray.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
KCT
Device Description
The Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray is intended to hold and protect Sonicision generators and battery packs during sterilization and storage, as indicated. It is comprised of a polysulfone base containing silicone inserts and a removable/latching polysulfone lid. The tray is reusable and provided to the customer in a non-sterile condition. Perforations on the lid and base permit exposure of the sterilant. Handles on the sides of the base facilitate transfer of the sterilized components, and the contoured inserts secure the contents within the tray.
The Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray does not contain gaskets, filters, or valves to act as a barrier to microorganisms during storage, handling, and transport. The tray containing its intended content (load) must be wrapped with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible polypropylene sterilization wrap or pouched with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible Tyvek® pouch (note: the wrap and pouch are not supplied by Covidien) and sterilized as instructed by the labeling.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non-Clinical Performance Studies:
Objective test evidence supporting sterilization efficacy, hydrogen peroxide residuals, material compatibility, biocompatibility, and mechanical performance were provided in the submission.
Sterilization efficacy: Sonicision Trays containing the intended maximum load (one reusable battery pack and one reusable generator) were inoculated with geobacillus stearothermophilus. The biological indictor containing the indicator organism was placed in areas of the battery pack, generator, and sterilization trav determined to be the most difficult (worstcase) for the sterilant to penetrate. Following inoculation, the sterilization trays were either wrapped with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible polypropylene wrap or enclosed in an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible Tyvek® Pouch. The loaded, inoculated, and wrapped or pouched trays were then exposed to the Standard cycles of the STERRAD® NX® and 100NX® systems, or the Lumen cycle of the STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® system. The results show that the indicated STERRAD and STERIS "half cycles" provided a sixlog reduction of the indicator organism.
Sterilant Residuals: Residuals testing by ultraviolet/visible (UV/VIS) spectroscopy compared the measured results of the Sonicision tray's load with those obtained for a reference predicate tray's load. The study consisted of three runs of loaded (one battery pack and one generator), wrapped, or pouched Sonicision trays placed in STERRAD or STERIS systems. Testing of the reference predicate tray consisted of at least one run of loaded placed in STERRAD or STERIS systems. The products were exposed to Standard cycles of each STERRAD NX® and 100NX®, and Lumen cycle of the STERIS Amsco V-PRO® model. The results show that the Sonicision Sterilization Tray permits adequate dissipation of hydrogen peroxide on the load when compared to the predicate devices used in the study.
Use Life (Material Compatibility): Life testing required all key functional/performance specifications of the tray to be evaluated after being subjected to complete reprocessing cycles using a worst-case methodology. The worst-case sterilization systems and cycles chosen for testing were the STERRAD 100NX with Standard cycle, and the STERIS V-Pro with Lumen cycle. The protocol required the tray to be assembled, cleaned, disinfected, dried and sterilized repeatedly (340 cycles) using the methods identified in the labeling. The results show the tray meets its performance specifications when reprocessed repeatedly in accordance with the labeling.
Biocompatibility: Biocompatibility testing was performed using a worst-case methodology by exposing the Sonicision Sterilization Tray to two full cycles (as indicated) of the STERRAD and STERIS systems. Test samples were prepared in accordance with ISO 10993-12:2007, Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Materials. All biocompatibility assays were performed on neat extracts. A quantitative assessment was made in accordance with applicable requirements of ISO 10993-5:2009, Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. The results show that the Sonicision Sterilization Tray passes all applicable biocompatibility requirements and is, therefore, considered non-cytotoxic following exposure to the intended sterilization systems.
Mechanical/Bench: The Sonicision Sterilization Tray was evaluated in accordance with applicable clauses/criteria specified in AAMI ST77:2006. The results show that all requirements were met.
Clinical Performance Studies: This premarket notification report does not rely on the assessment of clinical performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 880.6850 Sterilization wrap.
(a)
Identification. A sterilization wrap (pack, sterilization wrapper, bag, or accessories, is a device intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a health care provider. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device and also to maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "COVIDIEN" in bold, black letters. To the left of the word is a black and white logo that resembles a plus sign. The logo is made up of black and white squares. The word "COVIDIEN" is in all capital letters.
510(k) Summary
Date summary prepared: August 23, 2013
510(k) Submitter/Holder Covidien 5920 Longbow Drive Boulder. CO 80301
Contact
AUG 2 8 2013
David M. Horton Product Manager, Regulatory Affairs Telephone: 303-530-6391 Fax: 303-530-6313 david.m.horton@covidien.com
Name of (Subject) Device
Trade Name: Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray Common Name: Sterilization Tray Classification Name: Sterilization wrap containers, trays, cassettes & other accessories Device Class: II Classification Regulation: 21 CFR 880.6850 Product Code: KCT
Predicate Devices
The sterilization tray described in this submission was compared and found to be substantially equivalent to the following sterilization trays in commercial distribution:
Trade Name: Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray 510(k) Number: K112536, cleared 4/19/2012 Manufacturer: Covidien
Trade Name: V-PRO® Sterilization Tray 510(k) Number: K070769, cleared 10/5/2007 Manufacturer: STERIS Corporation
Trade Name: FinESS™ Endoscope Sterilization Tray 510(k) Number: K103213, cleared 2/2/2011 Manufacturer: Entellus Medical, Inc.
Device Description
The Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray is intended to hold and protect Sonicision generators and battery packs during sterilization and storage, as indicated. It is comprised of a polysulfone base containing silicone inserts and a removable/latching polysulfone lid. The tray is reusable and provided to the customer in a non-sterile condition. Perforations on the lid and base permit
1
K131170 510(k) Summary
exposure of the sterilant. Handles on the sides of the base facilitate transfer of the sterilized components, and the contoured inserts secure the contents within the tray.
The Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray does not contain gaskets, filters, or valves to act as a barrier to microorganisms during storage, handling, and transport. The tray containing its intended content (load) must be wrapped with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible polypropylene sterilization wrap or pouched with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible Tyvek® pouch (note: the wrap and pouch are not supplied by Covidien) and sterilized as instructed by the labeling.
Intended Use
The Sonicision Sterilization Tray is intended to be used to encase and protect reusable battery packs and generators of the Sonicision system during sterilization and storage. The tray containing up to one generator and one battery pack (maximum load) can be used with the following models and pre-set (non-adjustable) cycles.
| Model | Cycle |
|---|---|
| STERRAD® 100S | Standard |
| STERRAD® NX® | Standard |
| STERRAD® 100NX® | Standard |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 Plus | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® maX | Lumen |
Maintenance of sterility of the content within the tray is based on demonstrated performance of the sterilization wrap or pouch used to encase the tray.
Technological and Performance Characteristics
The proposed Sonicision tray was found to be similar to the predicate trays in several ways. Three fundamental similarities are identified and discussed below:
- (1) Basic design All trays are reusable accessories designed as two-part (lid/base) systems with latches, handles, perforations, and contoured inserts intended to contain items for sterilization, storage, transportation, aseptic presentation of contents, and return of contaminated items to the decontamination area. Notably other design aspects, such as the general shape, size, weight, and materials, though not identical, are similar.
- (2) Role in the sterile barrier system Neither the proposed tray nor the predicate trays contain gaskets, valves, or filters - they must all be enclosed with a qualified FDAcleared sterilization wrap or pouch to maintain sterility.
- (3) Fundamental technology All trays rely on surface perforations (holes or other openings) to allow the sterilant to penetrate and render its content sterile.
The primary differences between the predicate and proposed trays are variances in shape, size, weight, intended content, and surface perforations. Although a small difference in percent of surface perforations is noted, performance data demonstrate that the difference does not adversely affect safety and effectiveness. A comparison of the proposed device to the predicate devices is provided on the next page.
2
| K131170 | 510(k) Summary |
|---|---|
| --------- | ---------------- |
| | Proposed: Sonicision™
Sterilization Tray | Predicate: Sonicision™
Sterilization Tray,
K112536 | Predicate: V-PRO®
Sterilization Tray, K070769 | Predicate: FinESS™ Endoscope
Sterilization Tray, K103213 |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | To encase and protect reusable
batteries and generators of the
Sonicision system during
sterilization and storage.
Compatible sterilization systems are
indicated as follows:
-STERRAD® 100S
-STERRAD® NX®
-STERRAD® 100NX®
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 Plus
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® maX | To encase and protect
reusable batteries and
generators of the Sonicision
system during sterilization
and storage. Compatible
sterilization systems are
indicated as follows:
-STERRAD® 100S | To contain, transport, and store
reusable medical devices for
sterilization. Compatible
sterilization systems are indicated
as follows:
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO 1 Plus
-STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® maX | To encase and protect the FinESS
Endoscope for sterilization.
Compatible sterilization systems
are indicated as follows:
-STERRAD® NX®
-STERRAD® 100NX® |
| Design
Characteristics | | | | |
| Composition | Base and lid | Identical to proposed tray | Base and lid | Base and lid |
| Intended Content
(maximum load) | One Sonicision generator and one
battery pack | Identical to proposed tray | Reusable medical instrument(s),
as indicated by size and weight | One FinESS™ Endoscope |
| Inserts | Yes. Designed to secure intended
content | Identical to proposed tray | Yes. Various. Designed to secure
intended content | Yes. Designed to secure intended
content |
| Handles | Yes | Identical to proposed tray | Yes | No |
| Latches | Yes | Identical to proposed tray | Yes | Yes |
| Reusable | Yes | Identical to proposed tray | Yes | Yes |
| Materials of
Construction | | | | |
| Lid/Base | Polysulfone | Identical to proposed tray | Noryl resin | Polyetherimide |
| Inserts | Silicone | Identical to proposed tray | Polypropylene | Silicone |
| Latch | Polysulfone | Identical to proposed tray | 304 Stainless Steel | Polyetherimide |
510(k) Summary - Comparison Tabl
3
| 70 | ummary
S |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| I | (1) 0 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
l
ച്ച് ഗ |
| | Proposed: Sonicision™
Sterilization Tray | Predicate: Sonicision™
Sterilization Tray, K112536 | Predicate: V-PRO®
Sterilization Tray, K070769 | Predicate: FinESS™ Endoscope
Sterilization Tray, K103213 | |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Dimensions | Assembled (L×W) | 5.9 in. × 8.1 in. | Identical to proposed tray | 10 in. × 14 in. | 7.6 in × 4.1 in. |
| Weight | Containing
intended content
(Max Load) | 1.58 lbs
(1 battery and 1 generator) | Identical to proposed tray | 5.16 lbs
(various reusable medical
devices) | 11.61 oz
(one endoscope) |
| Fundamental
Technology | Percent of surface
perforations | 9.7% | Identical to proposed tray | 5% | 1% |
.
1
Page 4 of 6
4
K 131170 510(k) Summary
Non-Clinical Performance Studies
Objective test evidence supporting sterilization efficacy, hydrogen peroxide residuals, material compatibility, biocompatibility, and mechanical performance were provided in the submission. A brief description of all tests used to support the conclusion of substantial equivalence with the predicate devices is provided as follows:
Sterilization efficacy: Sonicision Trays containing the intended maximum load (one reusable battery pack and one reusable generator) were inoculated with geobacillus stearothermophilus. The biological indictor containing the indicator organism was placed in areas of the battery pack, generator, and sterilization trav determined to be the most difficult (worstcase) for the sterilant to penetrate. Following inoculation, the sterilization trays were either wrapped with an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible polypropylene wrap or enclosed in an FDA-cleared STERRAD or STERIS V-PRO-compatible Tyvek® Pouch. The loaded, inoculated, and wrapped or pouched trays were then exposed to the Standard cycles of the STERRAD® NX® and 100NX® systems, or the Lumen cycle of the STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® system. The results show that the indicated STERRAD and STERIS "half cycles" provided a sixlog reduction of the indicator organism.
Sterilant Residuals: Residuals testing by ultraviolet/visible (UV/VIS) spectroscopy compared the measured results of the Sonicision tray's load with those obtained for a reference predicate tray's load. The study consisted of three runs of loaded (one battery pack and one generator), wrapped, or pouched Sonicision trays placed in STERRAD or STERIS systems. Testing of the reference predicate tray consisted of at least one run of loaded placed in STERRAD or STERIS systems. The products were exposed to Standard cycles of each STERRAD NX® and 100NX®, and Lumen cycle of the STERIS Amsco V-PRO® model. The results show that the Sonicision Sterilization Tray permits adequate dissipation of hydrogen peroxide on the load when compared to the predicate devices used in the study.
Use Life (Material Compatibility): Life testing required all key functional/performance specifications of the tray to be evaluated after being subjected to complete reprocessing cycles using a worst-case methodology. The worst-case sterilization systems and cycles chosen for testing were the STERRAD 100NX with Standard cycle, and the STERIS V-Pro with Lumen cycle. The protocol required the tray to be assembled, cleaned, disinfected, dried and sterilized repeatedly (340 cycles) using the methods identified in the labeling. The results show the tray meets its performance specifications when reprocessed repeatedly in accordance with the labeling.
Biocompatibility: Biocompatibility testing was performed using a worst-case methodology by exposing the Sonicision Sterilization Tray to two full cycles (as indicated) of the STERRAD and STERIS systems. Test samples were prepared in accordance with ISO 10993-12:2007, Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Materials. All biocompatibility assays were performed on neat extracts. A quantitative assessment was made in accordance with applicable requirements of ISO 10993-5:2009, Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. The results show that the Sonicision Sterilization Tray passes all applicable biocompatibility requirements and is, therefore, considered non-cytotoxic following exposure to the intended sterilization systems.
Mechanical/Bench: The Sonicision Sterilization Tray was evaluated in accordance with applicable clauses/criteria specified in AAMI ST77:2006. The results show that all requirements were met.
5
K131170 510(k) Summary
Conformance to Standards and Guidance
The Sonicision Sterilization Tray conforms to applicable clauses of FDA-recognized consensus standard, AAMI ST77:2006, and draft FDA Guidance Document, "Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions for Medical Sterilization Packaging Systems in Health Care Facilities; Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA" (March 7, 2002). Notably, conformance to this standard and guidance document rely on adherence to the requirements and procedures of the following national and international standards: ISO 10993-1:2003 (Biocompatibility), AAMI ST81:2004 (Labeling), ISO 14937:2009 (Sterilization).
Clinical Performance Studies
This premarket notification report does not rely on the assessment of clinical performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
Conclusion
The Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray subject to this submission is substantially equivalent to the Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray (K112536), V-PRO® Sterilization Tray (K070769), and the FinESS™ Endoscope Sterilization Tray (K103213). None of the differences between the Sonicision tray and the predicate trays change the intended use or raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
6
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows a circular logo with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the top half of the circle. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle or bird-like figure with outstretched wings. The logo is black and white and appears to be a seal or emblem.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 28. 2013
Covidien Mr. David M. Horton Products Manager, Regulatory Affairs 5920 Longbow Drive BOULDER CO 80301
Rc: K131170
Trade/Device Name: Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6850 Regulation Name: Sterilization Tray Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KCT Dated: August 2. 2013 Received: August 6, 2013
Dear Mr. Horton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into cither class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA). it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
7
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements. including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mary S. Runner -S
Kwame Ulmer M.S. Acting Division Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
8
Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): K131170
Device Name: Sonicision™ Sterilization Tray
Indications for Use:
The Sonicision Sterilization Tray is intended to be used to encase and protect reusable battery packs and generators of the Sonicision system during sterilization and storage. The tray containing up to one generator and one battery pack (maximum load) can be used with the following models and pre-set (non-adjustable) cycles.
| Model | Cycle |
|---|---|
| STERRAD® 100S | Standard |
| STERRAD® NX® | Standard |
| STERRAD® 100NX® | Standard |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® 1 Plus | Lumen |
| STERIS Amsco® V-PRO® maX | Lumen |
Maintenance of sterility of the content within the tray is based on demonstrated performance of the sterilization wrap or pouch used to encase the tray.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use ✔ AND/OR (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED) .
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Sreekanth Gutala -S 2013.08.28 13:57:43 -04'00'
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices 510 (k) Number: