K Number
K120663
Date Cleared
2013-02-12

(344 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
864.1860
Panel
PA
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

For in vitro diagnostic use.

FLEX Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-Human Estrogen Receptor a, Clone EP1, Readyto-Use, (LINK), is intended for use in immunohistochemistry with EnVision™ FLEX, High pH visualization kit together with Autostainer Link 48 to semiquantitatively detect human estrogen receptor in formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissue sections of human breast cancer. The antibody labels estrogen receptor a-positive cells and is useful in the assessment of estrogen receptor status in human breast carcinomas.

The clinical interpretation of any staining or its absence should be complemented by morphological studies using proper controls and should be evaluated within the context of the patient's clinical history and other diagnostic tests by a qualified pathologist.

Device Description

Dako Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-Human Estrogen Receptor (ER) a, Clone EP1 (Dako Anti-Human ER a, clone EP1) antibody is utilized to perform a semi-quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) assay to identify estrogen receptor (ER) expression in human breast cancer tissues routinely processed and paraffin-embedded for histological examination. The ER a antibody is available in Ready-to-Use (RTU) format and is optimized for use with Dako Automated stainer Link 48. The RTU Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-Human Estrogen Receptor (ER) a, Clone EP1 is provided in one vial of ready-to-use monoclonal rabbit antibody contains 12 ml of reagent provided in liguid form in a buffer containing stabilizing protein and 0.015 mol/L sodium azide. The working Ig concentration of the antibody is approximately 3.7 ug/mL. Total protein concentration is approximately 10mg/mL.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for a medical device, specifically the Dako Anti-Human ER $\alpha$ Clone EP1. It describes the device, its intended use, and claims substantial equivalence to a predicate device, but does not contain typical acceptance criteria or a detailed study section with performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or concordance rates against a ground truth.

Instead, it states: "Performance characteristics evaluated in support of the Dako Anti-Human ER $\alpha$, clone EP1 IHC assay include results on specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility, and concordance testing. Results of all testing conducted have demonstrated a substantial degree of equivalency to the predicate device listed above." However, the actual results of these tests are not present in this document.

Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert details because this information is not included in the provided text.

The document only states that such studies were performed and showed "substantial equivalency" to the predicate device (ER $\alpha$ component of the Dako ER/PR pharmDx™ Kit, K042884).

If this were a typical AI/ML device submission, a dedicated section detailing these performance characteristics would be expected. Since this is an Immunohistochemistry (IHC) reagent, the performance evaluation methods might differ from those for an image-based AI device.

Without the actual performance data from the specific studies mentioned, I cannot complete the requested information.

§ 864.1860 Immunohistochemistry reagents and kits.

(a)
Identification. Immunohistochemistry test systems (IHC's) are in vitro diagnostic devices consisting of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies labeled with directions for use and performance claims, which may be packaged with ancillary reagents in kits. Their intended use is to identify, by immunological techniques, antigens in tissues or cytologic specimens. Similar devices intended for use with flow cytometry devices are not considered IHC's.(b)
Classification of immunohistochemistry devices. (1) Class I (general controls). Except as described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, these devices are exempt from the premarket notification requirements in part 807, subpart E of this chapter. This exemption applies to IHC's that provide the pathologist with adjunctive diagnostic information that may be incorporated into the pathologist's report, but that is not ordinarily reported to the clinician as an independent finding. These IHC's are used after the primary diagnosis of tumor (neoplasm) has been made by conventional histopathology using nonimmunologic histochemical stains, such as hematoxylin and eosin. Examples of class I IHC's are differentiation markers that are used as adjunctive tests to subclassify tumors, such as keratin.(2) Class II (special control, guidance document: “FDA Guidance for Submission of Immunohistochemistry Applications to the FDA,” Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, 1998). These IHC's are intended for the detection and/or measurement of certain target analytes in order to provide prognostic or predictive data that are not directly confirmed by routine histopathologic internal and external control specimens. These IHC's provide the pathologist with information that is ordinarily reported as independent diagnostic information to the ordering clinician, and the claims associated with these data are widely accepted and supported by valid scientific evidence. Examples of class II IHC's are those intended for semiquantitative measurement of an analyte, such as hormone receptors in breast cancer.
(3) Class III (premarket approval). IHC's intended for any use not described in paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section.
(c)
Date of PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required. As of May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is required for any device described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section before this device may be commercially distributed. See § 864.3.