K Number
K093421
Date Cleared
2010-04-23

(171 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
862.1680
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of testosterone in human serum and plasma. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay "ECLIA" is intended for use on Elecsys and cobas e immunoassay analyzers.

Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males and, in females hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and androgenital syndromes.

Device Description

The Elecsys Testosterone II immunoassay is based on a competitive test principle with streptavidin-coated microparticles and electrochemiluminescence detection. Results are determined using a calibration curve that is generated specifically on each instrument by a 2-point calibration and a master curve provided with the reagent bar code. The Elecsys Testosterone II reagent kit consists of a Reagent Pack (R1, R2, and M[Streptavidin-coated microparticles]).

AI/ML Overview

The Elecsys® Testosterone II Immunoassay is a device for the in vitro quantitative determination of testosterone in human serum and plasma using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The study provided focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Elecsys® Testosterone Assay, K964889) through method comparison tests and performance characteristic comparisons.

Here's an analysis of the provided information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a numerical format that must be met (e.g., "slope must be between 0.9 and 1.1"). Instead, it demonstrates performance through regression analysis and comparisons to the predicate device and reference methods. The implicit acceptance is that the Elecsys® Testosterone II Assay performs comparably to the predicate device and accurately against reference standards.

The table below summarizes the key performance characteristics and method comparison results for the Elecsys® Testosterone II Assay as described:

FeatureElecsys® Testosterone II Assay Performance
Measuring Range2.5 – 1500 ng/dL (0.087 – 52.0 nmol/L)
Precision (Intermediate Precision, Total)18.5% CV @ 4.5 ng/dL, 8.4% CV @ 9.5 ng/dL, 3.2% CV @ 69.1 ng/dL, 2.8% CV @ 216 ng/dL, 2.8% CV @ 867 ng/dL, 3.4% CV @ 1300 ng/dL, 2.4% CV @ 1450 ng/dL
Precision (Repeatability, Within-Run)10.2% CV @ 4.5 ng/dL, 4.7% CV @ 9.5 ng/dL, 2.1% CV @ 69.1 ng/dL, 1.9% CV @ 216 ng/dL, 2.6% CV @ 867 ng/dL, 1.2% CV @ 1300 ng/dL, 1.5% CV @ 1450 ng/dL
LoQ (Functional Sensitivity)12.0 ng/dL
LoB (Limit of Blank)1.2 ng/dL
LoD (Limit of Detection)2.5 ng/dL
Method Comparison 1 (vs. validated ID/LC-MS/MS, itself validated vs ID-GC/MS)n = 52 serum samples (8 - 1383 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 1.024, y-int = -0.060, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.996
Method Comparison 2 (vs. ID-GC/MS reference method)n = 55 serum samples (7.6 - 1383 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 1.032, y-int = -0.055, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.999
Method Comparison 3 (vs. validated ID/LC-MS/MS for female samples)n = 142 female serum samples (3 - 517 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 0.928, y-int = 0.047, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.959
Method Comparison 4 (vs. Predicate Device, Elecsys® Testosterone Assay)Male samples: n = 239 (6.3 - 1400 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 0.971, y-int = 0.085, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.985 Female samples: n = 148 (2.5 - 926 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 0.984, y-int = -7.34, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.972 Male and Female Samples Combined: n = 387 (2.5 - 1400 ng/dL) Deming Regression: Slope = 0.989, y-int = -2.87, Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.992

Acceptance Criteria (Implied):
While not explicitly stated as numerical acceptance criteria, the strong correlation coefficients (close to 1.0) and slopes (close to 1.0) and small y-intercepts in the regression analyses, coupled with low CVs for precision, indicate the device is performing comparably to both reference methods and the predicate device across its measuring range. This demonstrates that the new device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate.

2. Sample Sizes and Data Provenance

The studies are quantitative performance analyses of an in vitro diagnostic device, not human reader studies for image-based AI. Therefore, the "test set" concept here refers to the clinical samples used for method comparison.

  • Test Set (Method Comparison):
    • Study 1: 52 serum samples
    • Study 2: 55 serum samples
    • Study 3: 142 female serum samples
    • Study 4: 239 male and 148 female serum samples (total 387)
  • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but the submission is from Roche Diagnostics, based in Indianapolis, IN, indicating a US-based submission. The nature of in vitro diagnostic device studies typically involves clinical samples, likely collected from various clinical sites. The document does not specify if the data is retrospective or prospective, but based on the type of study (method comparison), it would involve testing collected samples.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

This is not applicable as the device is an immunoassay for quantitative determination of testosterone. The "ground truth" is established by highly accurate reference methods (ID-GC/MS and validated ID/LC-MS/MS), not by human experts interpreting data or images.

4. Adjudication Method

Not applicable. Adjudication methods (e.g., 2+1) are typically used for establishing ground truth in clinical evaluations involving subjective expert interpretation (like radiology reads). For quantitative assays, ground truth is based on objective measurements from reference methods.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

Not applicable. This is an immunoassay device, not an AI or imaging device that would involve human readers.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance

Yes, the studies evaluate the standalone performance of the Elecsys® Testosterone II Immunoassay. The assay directly measures testosterone levels, and its performance is assessed by comparing its results against established reference methods and the predicate device. There is no "human-in-the-loop" once a sample is loaded into the analyzer for the measurement itself.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth for the test set (method comparison studies) was established using:

  • ID-GC/MS (Isotope Dilution Gas-Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry): This is considered a gold standard reference method for testosterone measurement, providing highly accurate and precise quantitative values.
  • Validated ID/LC-MS/MS (Isotope dilution/liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry): This method was validated against the ID-GC/MS reference method and used as a highly accurate comparison method.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

The document does not specify a "training set" in the context of machine learning. For an immunoassay, the concept of a training set typically refers to samples used during the development and optimization of the assay's reagents and calibration parameters. This information is usually proprietary to the manufacturer and not detailed in a 510(k) summary, which focuses on validation studies proving performance for regulatory submission.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

As there's no explicitly defined "training set" in the provided document, the method for establishing its ground truth is not detailed. However, for an immunoassay, the development process would involve extensive use of characterized calibrators and controls, often traceable to international reference standards, to establish the assay's curve and ensure accurate measurement across its range. These calibrators would be assigned values using highly accurate reference methods (like ID-GC/MS) similar to those used for the test set ground truth.

{0}------------------------------------------------

093421

Elecsys® Testosterone II Immunoassay

:

Confidential

510(k) SummaryAPR 2 8 2010
IntroductionAccording to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following informationprovides sufficient detail to understand the basis for a determination ofsubstantial equivalence.
SubmitterName, Address,ContactRoche Diagnostics9115 Hague RoadIndianapolis, IN 46250Contact person: Sarah BaumannPhone: (317) 521-3952Fax: (317) 521-2324Email: sarah.baumann@roche.comSecondary contact: Stephanie GreemanPhone: (317) 521-2458Fax: (317) 521-2324Email: stephanie.greeman@roche.comDate Prepared: October 23, 2009
Device NameProprietary name: Elecsys® Testosterone II ImmunoassayCommon name: Testosterone II AssayClassification name: Testosterone Test System
DeviceDescriptionThe Elecsys Testosterone II immunoassay is based on a competitive testprinciple with streptavidin-coated microparticles andelectrochemiluminescence detection. Results are determined using acalibration curve that is generated specifically on each instrument by a 2-pointcalibration and a master curve provided with the reagent bar code.The Elecsys Testosterone II reagent kit consists of a Reagent Pack (R1, R2,and M[Streptavidin-coated microparticles]).
SubstantialEquivalenceThe Elecsys Testosterone II Test System is substantially equivalent to otherdevices legally marketed in the United States. We claim equivalency to thecurrently marketed Elecsys Testosterone Assay (K964889).

.

,

:

.

{1}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the Elecsys Testosterone II Immunoassay with Substantial Equivalencethe predicate device. Comparison

Table 1. Testosterone Immunoassay Comparison
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
Intended UseImmunoassay for the in vitroquantitative determination oftestosterone in human serum andplasma. The electrochemiluminescenceimmunoassay "ECLIA" is intended foruse on Elecsys and cobas eimmunoassay analyzers.Immunoassay for the in vitroquantitative determination oftestosterone in human serumand plasma. Theelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassay "ECLIA" isintended for use on theBoehringer Mannheim Elecsys1010 and 2010 immunoassayanalyzers.
Indications forUseMeasurements of testosterone are usedin the diagnosis and treatment ofdisorders involving the male sexhormones (androgens), includingprimary and secondary hypogonadism,delayed or precocious puberty,impotence in males and, in femaleshirsutism (excessive hair) andvirilization (masculinization) due totumors, polycystic ovaries, andadrenogenital syndromes.Same
Assay ProtocolCompetition principleSame
Detection ProtocolElectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassay (ECLIA)Same
Traceability/StandardizationID-GC/MS (Isotope Dilution Gas-Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry)Same
Sample TypeHuman serum and plasmaSame
Table 1. Testosterone Immunoassay Comparison, continued
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
InstrumentPlatformElecsys 2010(Request for CLIA categorizationhas been made to add theMODULAR ANALYTICS E170,cobas e 411, and cobas e 601analyzers according to theReplacement Reagent andInstrument Policy).Elecsys 2010(Elecsys 1010, MODULARANALYTICS E170, cobas e 411,and cobas e 601 analyzers addedsubsequent to clearance)
Measuring Range2.5 – 1500 ng/dL(0.087 – 52.0 nmol/L)2.0 – 1500 ng/dL(0.069 – 52.0 nmol/L)
CalibratorTestosterone II CalSet IICalibrators 1 and 2The stability, value assignment andmatrix is identical to TestosteroneCalSet II (cleared on K003411).Same
CalibrationIntervalOnce per reagent lot and• After 1 month (28 days) whenusing the same reagent lot• After 7 days (when using thesame reagent kit on the analyzer)• As required: e.g. quality controlfindings outside the specifiedlimitsSame
ControlsPreciControl Universal 1 and 2(cleared on K090541)Same
Reagent Stability• Unopened at 2-8°C – up to theexpiration date• Same
• After opening at 2-8°C – 12 weeks• After opening at 2-8°C – 8 weeks
• Onboard the analyzer – 8 weeks• Same
Table 2. Testosterone Immunoassay Performance Comparison
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
PrecisionElecsys 2010:Intermediate Precision (Total)18.5% CV @ 4.5 ng/dL8.4% CV @ 9.5 ng/dL3.2% CV @ 69.1 ng/dL2.8% CV @ 216 ng/dL2.8% CV @ 867 ng/dL3.4% CV @ 1300 ng/dL2.4% CV @ 1450 ng/dLRepeatability (Within-Run)10.2% CV @ 4.5 ng/dL4.7% CV @ 9.5 ng/dL2.1% CV @ 69.1 ng/dL1.9% CV @ 216 ng/dL2.6% CV @ 867 ng/dL1.2% CV @ 1300 ng/dL1.5% CV @ 1450 ng/dLElecsys 2010:Intermediate Precision (Total)7.4% CV @ 24 ng/dL2.6% CV @ 195 ng/dL2.2% CV @ 275 ng/dL1.6% CV @ 620 ng/dL1.7% CV @ 701 ng/dLRepeatability (Within-Run)4.6% CV @ 24 ng/dL1.7% CV @ 195 ng/dL1.4% CV @ 275 ng/dL0.9% CV @ 620 ng/dL1.1% CV @ 701 ng/dL
LoQ(FunctionalSensitivity)12.0 ng/dLSame
LoB(Limit of Blank)1.2 ng/dLN/A
LoD(Limit ofDetection)2.5 ng/dL2.0 ng/dL(Lower Detection Limit, LDL)
LimitationsThe assay is unaffected by:• Bilirubin: < 30 mg/dL• Hemoglobin: < 600 mg/dL• Intralipid: < 1000 mg/dL• Biotin: < 30 ng/mLThe assay is unaffected by:• Bilirubin: < 25 mg/dL• Hemoglobin: < 1 g/dL (1000 mg/dL)• Intralipid: < 1500 mg/dL• Biotin: < 30 ng/mL
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
Limitations, continued• In patients receiving therapy with high biotin doses (i.e. > 5 mg/day), no sample should be taken until at least 8 hours after the last biotin administration.• In patients receiving therapy with high biotin doses (i.e. > 5 mg/day), no sample should be taken until at least 8 hours after the last biotin administration.
• No interference was observed from rheumatoid factors up to a concentration of 1000 IU/mL.
• In vitro tests were performed with 18 commonly used pharmaceuticals. No interference with the assay was found.• In vitro tests were performed with 16 commonly used pharmaceuticals. No interference with the assay was found.
• Three additional drugs were tested: heparin clexane, dexamethasone, and Nandrolone. A strong interaction with Nandrolone was found. Do not use samples from patients under Nandrolone treatment.
• In isolated cases, elevated testosterone levels can be seen in samples from female patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).

{2}------------------------------------------------

Substantial Equivalence-Comparison (continued)

The following table compares the Elecsys Testosterone II Immunoassay with the predicate device.

{3}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Equivalence-Immunoassay with the predicate device. Comparison (continued)

{4}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Equivalence-Immunoassay with the predicate device. Comparison (continued)

{5}------------------------------------------------

:

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Equivalence-Immunoassay with the predicate device. Comparison (continued)

Table 2. Testosterone Immunoassay Performance Comparison, continued
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
Limitations, continuedIn rare cases, interference due to extremely high titers of antibodies to analyte-specific antibodies, streptavidin or ruthenium can occur. These effects are minimized by suitable test design. For diagnostic purposes, the results should always be assessed in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical examination and other findings. Implausible elevated values in female samples should be verified by an extraction method or validated LC-MS/MS tandem method.In rare cases interference due to extremely high titers of antibodies to streptavidin can occur. The risk of interference from potential immunological interactions between test components and rare sera have been minimized by the inclusion of suitable additives. For diagnostic purposes, the results should always be assessed in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical examination and other findings.

{6}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Immunoassay with the predicate device. Equivalence-Comparison (continued)

Table 2. Testosterone Immunoassay Performance Comparison, continued
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
MethodComparisonFour method comparison studies wereperformed to demonstrate the accuracyof the Elecsys Testosterone II assay.(1) Isotope dilution/liquidchromatographic-tandem massspectrometry (ID/LC-MS/MS) wasvalidated against the reference method,isotope-dilution/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS).A total of 52 serum samples withtestosterone values ranging from 8 to1383 ng/dL were measured.The following table summarizes theresults.The Elecsys Testosterone assay wascompared to the Coat-A-Count®Total Testosterone Assay.A total of 71 clinical samples withtestosterone values ranging from20 – 1269 ng/dL were tested insinglicate.The following table summarizes theresults.
Deming Regression n 52 Range 8-1383 ng/dL Slope 1.024 y-int -0.060 CorrelationCoefficient r = 0.996Passing/Bablok Least Squares n 71 71 Range 20-1269 ng/dL 20-1269 ng/dL Slope 1.02 0.956 y-int -0.108 0.049 tau/r 0.963 0.963

{7}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Equivalence-Immunoassay with the predicate device. Comparison (continued)

FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay(K964889)
MethodComparisoncontinued(2) The Elecsys Testosterone II assay wascompared to the ID-GC/MS reference method.A total of 55 serum samples with testosteronevalues ranging from 7.6 to 1383 ng/dL weremeasured.The following table summarizes the results.Deming Regression n 55 Range 7.6-1383 ng/dL Slope 1.032 y-int -0.055 CorrelationCoefficient r = 0.999
(3) The Elecsys Testosterone II assay wascompared to the validated ID/LC-MS/MSmethod.A total of 142 female serum samples withtestosterone values ranging from3 - 517 ng/dL were measured.The following table summarizes the results.Deming Regression n 142 Range 3-517 ng/dL Slope 0.928 y-int 0.047 CorrelationCoefficient r = 0.959

{8}------------------------------------------------

The following table compares the performance of the Elecsys Testosterone II Substantial Equivalence-Immunoassay with the predicate device. Comparison (continued)

Table 2. Testosterone Immunoassay Performance Comparison, continued
FeatureElecsys Testosterone II AssayPredicate DeviceElecsys Testosterone Assay (K964889)
Method Comparison continued(4) The Elecsys Testosterone II assay was compared to the predicate device, the Elecsys Testosterone assay (K964889).A total of 239 male and 148 female serum samples with testosterone values ranging from 6.3 – 1400 ng/dL and 2.5 – 926 ng/dL, respectively, were measured in singlicate.The following tables summarize the results.
Male samples
Deming Regression n 239 Range 6.3-1400 ng/dL Slope 0.971 y-int 0.085 Correlation Coefficient r = 0.985
Female samples
Deming Regression n 148 Range 2.5-926 ng/dL Slope 0.984 y-int -7.34 Correlation Coefficient r = 0.972
Male and Female Samples Combined
Deming Regression n 387 Range 2.5-1400 ng/dL Slope 0.989 y-int -2.87 Correlation Coefficient r = 0.992

{9}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, represented by a series of stylized lines.

Roche Diagnostics Corporation c/o Sarah Baumann 9115 Hague Road P.O.Box 50410 Indianapolis, IN 46250

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-0609 Silver Spring. MD 20993-0002

APR 2 3 2010

Re: K093421

Trade Name: Elecsys® Testosterone II Assay Regulation Number: 21 CFR §862.1680 Regulation Name: Testosterone test system Regulatory Class: Class I, reserved Product Codes: CDZ Dated: April 19, 2010 Received: April 20, 2010

Dear Ms. Baumann:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820).

{10}------------------------------------------------

Page 2

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (301) 796-5450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (301) 796-5760. For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or ( 301 ) 796-5680 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours.

CA

Courtney C. Harper, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{11}------------------------------------------------

Indication for Use

510(k) Number (if known): K093421

8 Device Name: Elecsys Testosterone II Assay

Indication For Use:

Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of testosterone in human serum and plasma. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay "ECLIA" is intended for use on Elecsys and cobas e immunoassay analyzers.

Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males and, in females hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and androgenital syndromes.

Prescription Use X (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart D) And/Or

Over the Counter Use (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE; CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation' and Safety (OIVD)

Carol Benson

Division Sign-Off Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety

510(k) K09342/

§ 862.1680 Testosterone test system.

(a)
Identification. A testosterone test system is a device intended to measure testosterone (a male sex hormone) in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurement of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males and, in females hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.(b)
Classification. Class I.