The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera is intended for chairside use by dentists and dental sub-specialists during oral health examinations. It provides magnified digital color images of intraoral or extraoral anatomy via a video monitor or Personal Computer (PC). Both still and video images can be captured and stored. The device allows practitioners to view the interior of the oral cavity and assist in the assessment of the overall oral health of the patient. The Kodak 1500 also provides a tool for communicating treatment requirements or results by allowing practitioner and patient to view areas of concern together, before and after procedures.

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera is indicated for use by health professionals in viewing and capturing intraoral or extraoral color video images for the purposes of:

Allowing practitioners to view and magnify regions of the oral cavity
Assisting communications with the patient by providing a view of treatment areas before and after a procedure
Providing images for documentation in patient records.

Device Description

The Kodak 1500 includes a camera/handpiece assembly, docking station, and embedded acquisition software. It is available in two versions: Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera – wired and Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera – wireless. The wireless version, in which the handpiece transmits the acquired image data to the docking station via Wi-Fi, also includes a charging station. Users may use the system with only a chairside video monitor, or may connect it to a PC. The camera/handpiece includes illumination via eight white-light LEDs.

AI/ML Overview

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera 510(k) summary does not include specific acceptance criteria or an explicit study proving performance against such criteria. The document focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices and detailing non-clinical testing.

Here's an analysis of what information is present and what is missing based on your requested format:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria (Not Explicitly Stated)	Reported Device Performance
No explicit numerical or quantitative acceptance criteria are provided in the document.	"Results of testing demonstrate that the device is safe and effective in meeting user requirements in accordance with its intended use." (General statement).

Study Details:

Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- Not provided. The document states "Bench top performance testing... was performed on Hardware sub-systems, Software sub-systems, and on the complete assembled device" and "The system also has undergone laboratory testing for mechanical, electrical, and EMC/EMI." However, no details on test sample sizes (e.g., number of images, number of test cases, duration of tests) or data provenance are mentioned.
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- Not provided. The document does not describe any human-observer-based ground truth establishment for performance testing.
Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable/Not provided. No human-observer studies or ground truthing methods involving adjudication are described.
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No, an MRMC study was not done/reported. The device is an intraoral camera, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool, so this type of study would not be expected in this context.
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable/Not explicitly stated. The device is a camera. Its "performance" would relate to image quality, functionality (wired/wireless), and other technical specifications, not an "algorithm only" diagnostic output. The non-clinical testing likely evaluated these aspects in a standalone manner (e.g., camera's image capture capabilities, wireless transmission reliability).
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- Not explicitly stated for image-related performance. For the non-clinical testing mentioned (hardware, software, mechanical, electrical, EMC/EMI), the "ground truth" would be engineering specifications and regulatory standards. For image quality, it would likely involve objective metrics or comparison to established reference images, but this is not detailed.
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This device is a camera, not an AI model that requires a training set.
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable. This device is a camera, not an AI model.

Summary of Device and Approval:

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera's 510(k) summary focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices (Gendex AcuCam Concept IV and STV Pro 2) based on intended use, technological characteristics, principles of operation, intended users, energy use, materials, biocompatibility, labeling, workflow, and other relevant characteristics.

The "Non-clinical Testing" section states that "Bench top performance testing of the Kodak 1500 was performed on Hardware sub-systems, Software sub-systems, and on the complete assembled device. The system also has undergone laboratory testing for mechanical, electrical, and EMC/EMI." The conclusion drawn from this testing is that "Results of testing demonstrate that the device is safe and effective in meeting user requirements in accordance with its intended use." This is a general statement of compliance, not a detailed presentation of specific performance metrics against an acceptance criterion.

This type of submission is common for Class I devices like intraoral cameras, where the primary concern is safety and effectiveness based on established technology and substantial equivalence to legally marketed devices, rather than novel diagnostic performance.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera

Carestream Health, Inc.

K091186

510(k) Summary Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera

1. Company Identification

Carestream Health, Inc. 150 Verona Street Rochester, NY 14608 Establishment Registration: 1315356

2. Contact Person

Daniel Hoefer Manager, Regulatory Affairs. Dental Systems 1765 The Exchange Atlanta, GA 30339 Tel 770 226 3287 Fax 770 850 5011

3. Device Name

Commercial name: Common name: Classification name: Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera Dental Intraoral Camera Dental Operative Unit

4. Device Classification

Class: I Product Code: EIA

5. Intended Use

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera (Kodak 1500) is intended for chairside use by dentists and dental sub-specialists during oral health examinations. It provides magnified digital color images of intraoral or extraoral anatomy via a video monitor or Personal Computer (PC). Both still and video images can be captured and stored. The device allows practitioners to view the interior of the oral cavity and assist in the assessment of the overall oral health of the patient. The Kodak 1500 also provides a tool for communicating treatment requirements or results by allowing practitioner and patient to view areas of concern together, before and after procedures.

6. Device Description

page 1 of 2

AUG 1 8 2009

{1}------------------------------------------------

system with only a chairside video monitor, or may connect it to a PC. The camera/handpiece includes illumination via eight white-light LEDs.

7. Substantial Equivalence

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera is substantially equivalent to Gendex AcuCam Concept IV Intraoral Camera System (Gendex, K000112) and to the STV Pro 2 (Trophy Radiologie, K033419).

Each device is intended for use in dental or dental sub-specialty intraoral e video image acquisition, for the purposes of viewing the oral cavity and patient communication.
The technological characteristics and principles of operation are � equivalent. Each device consists of a digital video camera assembled within a handpiece, connection to a docking station, and display on a chairside monitor.
. The intended users of each device are the same or similar. Each is intended for use by dentists and other oral health specialists.
The devices are substantially equivalent in terms of energy used or . delivered, materials, biocompatibility, labeling, workflow, technology, and other relevant characteristics.

8. Non-clinical Testing

Bench top performance testing of the Kodak 1500 was performed on Hardware sub-systems, Software sub-systems, and on the complete assembled device. The system also has undergone laboratory testing for mechanical, electrical, and EMC/EMI.

Results of testing demonstrate that the device is safe and effective in meeting user requirements in accordance with its intended use.

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the department's logo in the center. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus, which is a symbol of medicine and health. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the perimeter of the circle.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

Carestream Health, Incorporated C/O Mr. Daniel Hoefer Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Dental Systems Group PracticeWorks Systems, LLC 1765 The Exchange Atlanta, Georgia 30339

AUG 1 8 2009

Re: K091186

Trade/Device Name: Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6640 Regulation Name: Dental Operative Unit and Accessories Regulatory Class: I Product Codes: EIA Dated: July 31, 2009 Received: August 18, 2009

Dear Mr. Hoefer:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. Hoefer

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820): and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please contact the CDRH/Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3464. For more information regarding the reporting of adverse events, please go to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdr/.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.

Sincerely yours.

Susan Tanner

Susan Runner, D.D.S., M.A. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

{4}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known): K091186

Device Name: Indications for Use:

The Kodak 1500 Intraoral Camera is indicated for use by health professionals in viewing and capturing intraoral or extraoral color video images for the purposes of:

Allowing practitioners to view and magnify regions of the oral cavity
Assisting communications with the patient by providing a view of treatment areas before and after a procedure
Providing images for documentation in patient records.

Prescription Use X (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart D)

AND/OR

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR Part 807 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Kein Ruby for NSA

(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anestheslology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices

510(k) Number:

Page 1 of 1

Regulation Number and Section

§ 872.6640 Dental operative unit and accessories.

(a)
Identification. A dental operative unit and accessories is an AC-powered device that is intended to supply power to and serve as a base for other dental devices, such as a dental handpiece, a dental operating light, an air or water syringe unit, and oral cavity evacuator, a suction operative unit, and other dental devices and accessories. The device may be attached to a dental chair.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). Except for dental operative unit, accessories are exempt from premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 872.9.