K Number
K090154
Date Cleared
2009-07-27

(186 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3640
Panel
DE
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

SPI® Dental Implant, INICELL® is for one-stage or two-stage surgical procedures. SPI Dental Implant, INICELL is intended for immediate placement and function on single-tooth and/or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, to restore chewing function. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted. In the case of edentulous patients, four or more implants must be used in immediately loaded cases.

Contraindications for the use of SPI ELEMENT INICELL implant Ø 3.5 mm and SPI CONTACT INICELL implant Ø 3.5 mm:

These implants are not suitable for applications in areas where pronounced rotation and translation movements occur, causing the implant to be subjected to large bending movements.

  • Restoration of posterior teeth in the upper and lower jaw
  • Single-tooth restoration of canines and central incisors in the upper jaw
  • Any application involving retentive anchors
Device Description

The design of the Thommen Medical AG endosseous dental implants has been modified to include a new surface treatment that will be marketed as the SP1® Dental Implant, INICELL® All features other than this surface treatment of the implants remain the same as the TST Surface implants. Other components of the SP1® Dental Implant System have not been modified, are suitable for use with the modified implants, and will be sold under the SPI Dental Implant System name.

AI/ML Overview

The provided 510(k) summary for the Thommen Medical AG SPI® Dental Implant, INICELL® does not contain information related to acceptance criteria, device performance, or any studies proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria.

Instead, the document focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to previously marketed predicate devices based on similarities in intended use, operating principle, basic design, materials, packaging, and sterilization processes.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format specified. The document primarily functions as a regulatory submission demonstrating equivalence, not as a report on a clinical or performance study with defined acceptance criteria and statistical outcomes.

§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.