(32 days)
The Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder prosthesis is indicated for use in a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint with severe arthropathy or a previous failed joint replacement with a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint.
The patient's joint must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the selected implant(s), and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary to use the device.
In cases of bone defects in the proximal humerus, the monobloc implant should be used and then only in cases where the residual bone permits firm fixation of this implant.
Delta Xtend hemi-shoulder replacement is also indicated for hemi-arthroplasty if the glenoid is fractured intraoperatively or for revision of a previously failed Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder.
The metaglene component is HA coated and is intended for cementless use with the addition of screws for fixation.
The modular humeral stem and epiphysis components are HA coated and intended for cementless use.
All other components are for cemented use only.
The Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder prosthesis is intended for use in total or hemi shoulder arthroplasty procedures in patients with non-functional rotator cuffs, with or without bone cement. HA coated components are for cementless use only.
The Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System is a modular shoulder prosthesis designed for use in patients with non-functional rotator cuffs.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding the DePuy Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System. This document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets those criteria.
Instead, this document focuses on:
- Substantial Equivalence: The FDA's determination that the DePuy Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System (specifically the High Mobility Cup) is substantially equivalent to previously cleared devices (Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System, K062250 and K071379). This means the FDA believes the new device is as safe and effective as existing legally marketed predicate devices.
- Indications for Use: The medical conditions for which the device is intended.
- Device Description: A brief overview of the device's design and components.
- Regulatory Classification: The device's classification (Class II) and associated regulations.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, reported device performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment based on the provided text. This type of detailed study information is typically found in a clinical study report or a more comprehensive technical document, not in a 510(k) clearance letter.
§ 888.3660 Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”