K Number
K073067
Date Cleared
2008-02-15

(108 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3640
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The ANKYLOS® Dental Implant System is indicated for surgical placement in the upper and lower jaw arches, to provide a root form means for single or multiple unit prosthetic appliance attachment to restore a patient's chewing function. Implants can be placed with a conventional 2 stage surgical process with an option for transmucosal healing or they can be placed in a single stage surgical process for immediate loading. Immediate loading is restricted to the anterior mandible, based on 4 interforminal placed implants, and not indicated for single, unsplinted implants. Patients must be subject for dental treatment with endosseus implant.

Device Description

The ANKYLOS® Dental Implant System has been cleared for commercial distribution. The purpose of this application is to obtain clearance for additional marketing claims associated with the special features of the ANKYLOS® Dental Implant System.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria.

The document is a 510(k) summary for the ANKYLOS® Dental Implant System. It primarily focuses on:

  • Device Description and Intended Use: Explaining what the device is and what it's used for.
  • Predicate Device Information: Stating that the current device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared one.
  • Technological Characteristics: Asserting that no changes have been made to the device itself, implying that previous safety and effectiveness data still apply.
  • Regulatory Communication: Correspondence from the FDA affirming the substantial equivalence and permitting marketing.

There is no mention of:

  • Specific performance metrics or acceptance criteria for the device (e.g., success rates, torque values, osseointegration rates).
  • Any clinical or non-clinical study that was conducted to demonstrate performance against such criteria.
  • Details about test sets, data provenance, expert panels, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, or ground truth establishment.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table or detailed information about a study based on the given text.

§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.