(92 days)
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is intended for nasogastric or orogastric delivery of various types of liquid nutritional media through the gastro intestinal tract of neonatal and small pediatric patients, and is not intended for use beyond 30 days.
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is a silicone single lumen catheter that is used to deliver liquid nutritional media. The device consists of the following main components: a feeding tube or catheter, a hub with a plug, and either an enteral only, luer lock and/or universal connector.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving performance against specific acceptance criteria through extensive clinical studies. Therefore, many of the requested details about acceptance criteria, ground truth, sample sizes for training/test sets, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, and MRMC studies are not applicable or not provided in this document.
The "study" that proves the device meets acceptance criteria in this context is the bench testing demonstrating functional equivalence, which is a common approach for 510(k) submissions of this nature.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Functional Equivalence to Predicate Device | "Bench testing has demonstrated that the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is functionally equivalent to predicate feeding tubes currently on the market and that any minor differences do not affect safety or effectiveness." |
| "Functional test results demonstrate that the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube performs its intended use of supplying liquid media and is equivalent to the predicate device." | |
| Material Biocompatibility ("Safety") | "The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube materials that come in direct contact with the patient have a long history of use in catheter and feeding tube manufacture and are biocompatible." |
| Intended Use Fulfillment ("Effectiveness") | "The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube performs its intended use of supplying liquid media..." (This is confirmed by the functional equivalence to the predicate, which is already established to perform this intended use). |
| Method of Operation | "Both devices have the same method of operation, delivery of liquid nutrition media through a single lumen catheter." (This is a statement of design equivalence, an inherent part of establishing functional equivalence and safety/effectiveness for this type of device.) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified. The document only mentions "bench testing" without providing details on the number of tubes tested.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the sense of patient data. The "data" comes from engineering bench tests comparing the NeoMed device to an existing predicate device. No patient data (retrospective or prospective) is mentioned.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
- Number of Experts: Not applicable. For bench testing of functional equivalence, "ground truth" is typically established by engineering specifications, validated test methods, and comparison to a known standard (the predicate device). It does not involve expert clinical review of test results in the way, for example, an imaging AI would.
- Qualifications of Experts: Not applicable.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Adjudication Method: Not applicable. Bench testing generally follows pre-defined protocols and acceptance criteria based on engineering and performance standards, not a clinical adjudication process.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
- MRMC Study: No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is typically used for diagnostic devices (e.g., imaging AI) to compare the performance of human readers with and without AI assistance. The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is a medical device for delivery of nutritional media, and its evaluation focuses on functional performance and material safety, not diagnostic accuracy requiring human reader interpretation.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
- Standalone Performance: Not applicable. This device is a physical medical device, not a software algorithm. Therefore, "standalone performance" in the context of an algorithm is not relevant. Its performance is inherent in its physical properties and functional testing.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- Type of Ground Truth: For the "study" (bench testing), the ground truth is effectively functional specifications and performance of the predicate device. The NeoMed tube's performance was compared against the known and accepted performance characteristics of the CATCO Nutritional Catheter (K945012) to demonstrate equivalence. Material biocompatibility relies on a "long history of use" for the materials, implying a well-established safety profile.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Ground Truth for Training Set: Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K07288i
1 of 2
SUMMARY OF SAFETY & EFFECTIVENESS
NEOMED
incorporated
JAN - 9 2008
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
| APPLICANT | NeoMed507 Hickory Ridge TrailSuite 120Woodstock, GA 30188Tony Lair, PresidentTel: 770-516-2225Fax: 770-516-2448e-mail: lair1@concentric.net |
|---|---|
| OFFICIALCorrespondent | Penny Northcutt, RAC, CQARegulatory Consultant for NeoMed, Inc.REGSolutions, LLCTel: 678-428-6978Fax: 678-513-0937e-mail: pennynorthcutt@theregsolutions.com |
| TRADE NAME: | NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube |
| CLASSIFICATIONNAME: | Gastrointestinal Tube and accessories |
| DEVICECLASSIFICATIONAND PRODUCTCODE | Class II per 21 CFR §876.5980Product Code: 78 FPD |
| PREDICATEDEVICE NAME | CATCO Nutritional Catheter (K945012) |
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is substantially equivalent to the CATCO Nutritional Catheter cleared under K945012.
Both devices have the same method of operation, delivery of liquid nutrition media through a single lumen catheter. Bench testing has demonstrated that the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is functionally equivalent to predicate feeding tubes currently on the market and that any minor differences do not affect safety or effectiveness.
{1}------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is a silicone single lumen catheter that is used to deliver liquid nutritional media.
The device consists of the following main components: a feeding tube or catheter, a hub with a plug, and either an enteral only, luer lock and/or universal connector.
INDICATIONS FOR USE:
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is intended for nasogastric or orogastric delivery of various types of liquid nutritional media through the gastro intestinal tract of neonatal and small pediatric patients, and is not intended for use beyond 30 days.
PERFORMANCE DATA:
The NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube materials that come in direct contact with the patient have a long history of use in catheter and feeding tube manufacture and are biocompatible. Functional test results demonstrate that the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube performs its intended use of supplying liquid media and is equivalent to the predicate device.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the performance testing, it can be concluded that the NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube is equivalent to the predicate CATCO Nutritional Catheter with respect to intended use and technological characteristics.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three bars extending from its head, enclosed within a circle. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the upper portion of the circle.
-
- 2008
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NeoMed, Inc. % Ms. Penny Northcutt Executive Director REGSolutions, LLC 717 Lakeglen Drive SUWANEE GA 30024
Re: K072881
Trade/Device Name: NeoMed Enteral Feeding Tube Regulation Number: 21 CFR §876.5980 Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal tubes and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FPD Dated: December 21, 2007 Received: December 27, 2007
Dear Ms. Northcutt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter.
| 21 CFR 876.xxxx | (Gastroenterology/Renal/Urology) | 240-276-0115 |
|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR 884.xxxx | (Obstetrics/Gynecology) | 240-276-0115 |
| 21 CFR 892.xxxx | (Radiology) | 240-276-0120 |
| Other | 240-276-0100 |
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at 240-276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
Nancy C. Brogdon
Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Healt
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): ____K072881 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Device Name: NEOMED ENTERAL FEEDING TUBE
Indications for Use:
The NeoMed, Inc. Feeding Tube is intended for nasogastric or orogastric delivery of various types of liquid nutritional media through the gastro intestinal tract of neonatal and small pediatric patients, and is not intended for use beyond 30 days.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| Prescription Use | X |
|---|---|
| (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | |
| OR Over-The-Counter Use | |
| (Division Sign-Off) | |
| Division of Reproductive, Abdominal and Radiological Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | K072881 |
§ 876.5980 Gastrointestinal tube and accessories.
(a)
Identification. A gastrointestinal tube and accessories is a device that consists of flexible or semi-rigid tubing used for instilling fluids into, withdrawing fluids from, splinting, or suppressing bleeding of the alimentary tract. This device may incorporate an integral inflatable balloon for retention or hemostasis. This generic type of device includes the hemostatic bag, irrigation and aspiration catheter (gastric, colonic, etc.), rectal catheter, sterile infant gavage set, gastrointestinal string and tubes to locate internal bleeding, double lumen tube for intestinal decompression or intubation, feeding tube, gastroenterostomy tube, Levine tube, nasogastric tube, single lumen tube with mercury weight balloon for intestinal intubation or decompression, and gastro-urological irrigation tray (for gastrological use).(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The barium enema retention catheter and tip with or without a bag that is a gastrointestinal tube and accessory or a gastronomy tube holder accessory is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I (general controls) for the dissolvable nasogastric feed tube guide for the nasogastric tube. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.