(71 days)
The LowTop Pedicle Screw System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (Pseudoarthrosis).
In addition, this device is a pedicle screw system indicated for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to S1) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion.
The LowTop System is intended for posterior, non-cervical pedicle fixation for the following indications:
Spondylolisthesis
Trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation)
Spinal stenosis
Deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis)
Tumor
Pseudoarthrosis
Failed previous fusion
In addition, this device is a pedicle screw system indicated for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to S1) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion.
The LowTop Pedicle Screw System is a spinal system that consists of screws, rods, connectors and associated instruments. Fixation is provided by bone (pedicular) screws inserted into the vertebral body of the spine using a posterior approach.
The LowTop Pedicle Screw System is a spinal implant system. The provided text describes the device's mechanical testing, which served as the study to demonstrate it met the acceptance criteria.
-
Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
Test Type Acceptance Criteria (Standard) Reported Device Performance Static Compression Bending ASTM F1717 "performed as designed and met, or exceeded, all product specifications" Static Torsion ASTM F1717 "performed as designed and met, or exceeded, all product specifications" Dynamic Compression Bending ASTM F1717 "performed as designed and met, or exceeded, all product specifications" -
Sample Size and Data Provenance:
- The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for each mechanical test.
- The data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin or retrospective/prospective. This was a laboratory study of a medical device, not a clinical trial with patient data.
-
Number of Experts and their Qualifications (for ground truth):
- Not applicable. This device is hardware that underwent mechanical testing against engineering standards, not an AI or diagnostic device that requires expert-established ground truth from clinical data.
-
Adjudication Method (for ground truth):
- Not applicable, as this was a mechanical testing study against established engineering standards rather than a clinical study requiring consensus among experts.
-
Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
- No, a MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This is a mechanical device, and such studies are typically for AI-powered diagnostic or interpretive tools.
-
Standalone Performance Study:
- Yes, the "standalone" performance in this context refers to the device's mechanical integrity as an independent unit. The mechanical testing itself, conducted on the device, represents its standalone performance.
-
Type of Ground Truth Used:
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance was the specifications and requirements outlined in the ASTM F1717 standard for spinal implant constructs.
-
Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an algorithm that requires a training set.
-
How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:
- Not applicable. There was no training set for this type of device.
§ 888.3070 Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system.
(a)
Identification. (1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.