(437 days)
The NiliMedix ADI insulin pump is intended for the continuous delivery of insulin, at set and variable rates, for the management of diabetes mellitus in persons requiring insulin.
The NiliMedix ADI Insulin Pump is an ambulatory, battery operated, rate programmable micro infusion pump, designed for continuous delivery of insulin. A custom reservoir is driven by the insulin pressure to deliver preset basal profiles and patient programmed bolus of insulin through FDA cleared infusion sets into subcutaneous tissue. The ADI pump is restricted to sale by, or on the order of a physician.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the NiliMedix ADI Insulin Pump, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a performance study with detailed acceptance criteria and results in the manner typically seen for novel devices.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text, addressing your points where information is available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not provide a specific table of acceptance criteria with numerical targets and corresponding measured performance values. Instead, it states that the device was designed and tested in accordance with IEC 60601-2-24 and other relevant standards, and that performance tests showed the ADI's performance to be "substantially equivalent to the predicate device."
The types of tests conducted are listed, implying that the acceptance criteria would be derived from the requirements of the standards and the performance of the predicate device (Minimed Model 508, K990801).
Here's a conceptual representation based on the information, acknowledging that specific numerical criteria and results are not provided:
| Performance Test | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Pump Flow rate Accuracy | Compliant with IEC 60601-2-24 and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Pump Bolus Accuracy | Compliant with IEC 60601-2-24 and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Battery Indication Performance | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Air In System Detection | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Valve leakage and Piston Leakage Alarm | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Valve blockage Alarm | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Cartridge depletion and Low insulin Alert | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Usability study | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Cartridge Performance validation | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Pump Operational Life validation | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Infusion set testing for compatibility | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Flow Rate Accuracy for Minimum Flow Rate | Compliant with IEC 60601-2-24 and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Flow Rate Accuracy after Change in infusion rate or Bolus Dose | Compliant with IEC 60601-2-24 and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Insulin Stability Study | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Spring Component validation | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Minimum Bolus Accuracy | Compliant with IEC 60601-2-24 and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Occlusion Alarm Test | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Free fall Test and Vibration tests | Compliant with relevant standards and equivalent to predicate device | ADI performance substantially equivalent to predicate device |
| Biocompatibility | Compliant with ISO 10993 | Tested according to relevant standards |
| Sterilization validation | Compliant with relevant standards | Tested according to relevant standards |
| Electrical safety | Compliant with IEC 60601-1 | Tested according to relevant standards |
| EMC | Compliant with IEC 60601-1-2, CISPR 11, IEC 61000-4-2/3/4/5, IEC 55011, IEC 801-2 | Tested according to relevant standards |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
The document explicitly states that no animal or clinical studies were conducted for this 510(k) submission. All performance testing was non-clinical (bench testing). Therefore, there is no "test set" in the context of clinical data, sample size for patients, or data provenance from a specific country of origin (retrospective or prospective). The data provenance is entirely from laboratory bench testing performed by NiliMedix Ltd.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. As no clinical studies were performed, there was no need for experts to establish ground truth from patient data. The ground truth for bench tests would be the established scientific and engineering principles, and the standards (e.g., IEC 60601-2-24) to which the device was tested.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring adjudication by experts was used.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/imaging device. It is an insulin pump. No MRMC studies were conducted.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Not applicable, as this is an insulin pump, not an algorithm. The device's performance was evaluated inherently as a standalone product during bench testing.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth for the non-clinical performance tests was based on:
- Requirements outlined in specified international standards (e.g., IEC 60601-2-24, ISO 13485, ISO 10993, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, CISPR 11, IEC 61000-4-2/3/4/5, IEC 55011, IEC 801-2).
- The performance characteristics of the legally marketed predicate device (Minimed Model 508). The submission's goal was to demonstrate that the ADI's performance was "as good as" the predicate device and met standard requirements.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, no training set was used.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Nilimedix. The logo is in black and white and features the company name in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the company name is the phrase "Innovative Medical" in a smaller font.
510(K) SUMMARY
510(k) Number K070844
JUN - 6 2008
| Applicant's Name: | NiliMedix Ltd.Matam – Advanced Technology Center Building No. 5/2Haifa 31905ISRAELTel (972)4-855-0652Fax (972)4-850-0297 |
|---|---|
| ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-
Yoram Levy, Osite Contact Person: 31 Haavoda Street Binyamina, Israel 30500 Tel (972)4-638-8837; Fax (972)4-638-0510 yoram@gsitemed.com
ADI Insulin Pump Trade Name: -
Classification: Name: External infusion insulin pump Product Code: LZG Regulation No: 880.5725 Class: II Classification Panel: 80 - General Hospital and Personal Use Device
Device Description:
The NiliMedix ADI Insulin Pump is an ambulatory, battery operated, rate programmable micro infusion pump, designed for continuous delivery of insulin. A custom reservoir is driven by the insulin pressure to deliver preset basal profiles and patient programmed bolus of insulin through FDA cleared infusion sets into subcutaneous tissue. The ADI pump is restricted to sale by, or on the order of a physician.
Intended Use Statement:
The NiliMedix ADI insulin pump is intended for the continuous delivery of insulin, at set and variable rates, for the management of diabetes mellitus in persons requiring insulin.
Predicate Device: Substantial equivalence to the following predicate device is claimed:
| Minimed Model 508Comments of the program of the first and a first and a first of the Address of the Address of the Address of the Address of the Children | Ambulatory Insulin Pump K990801 Decision Date: June 8, 1999 |
|---|
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for "Nilimedix". The logo is in black and the font is bold. Below the logo, there is a tagline that says "Innovative Medicine".
Performance Standards
The performance standard that is applicable to the testing of infusion pumps is IEC60601-2-24.
The ADI complies with the European Mcdical Device Directive 93/42/EEC (Annex II) and with the voluntary standards ISO 13485, ISO 10993, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, CISPR 11, IEC 61000-4-2/3/4/5, IEC 55011 and IEC 801-2.
Summary of non-clinical performance data
The ADI Insulin Infusion Pump has been designed and tested in accordance with IEC 60601-2-24. The following tests were conducted:
Pump Flow rate Accuracy, Pump Bolus Accuracy, Battery Indication Performance, Air In System Detection, Valve leakage and Piston Leakage Alarm , Valve blockage Alarm, Cartridge depletion and Low insulin Alert, Usability study, Cartridge Performance validation, Pump Operational Life validation, Infusion set testing for compatibility with ADI insulin pump, Flow Rate Accuracy for Minimum Flow Rate, Flow Rate Accuracy after Change in the infusion rate or Bolus Dose, Insulin Stability Study, Spring Component validation, Minimum Bolus Accuracy, Occlusion Alarm Test, Free fall Test and Vibration tests.
The ADI pump was also tested for biocompatibility, sterilization validation, electrical safety and EMC according to the relevant standards.
Performance tests were conducted in order to show that the quality of the design is as good as the predicate device and meets the standard's requirements.
The performance tests show that the ADI performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate devicc
Summary of Clinical performance data
Due to the satisfactory results of the comprehensive bench performance tests, clinical study of predicate devices and the long use of predicate devices. NiliMedix believes that animal and clinical studies are not required to determine the safety and efficacy of the device.
Conclusions:
Evidence of equivalence has been demonstrated that:
- · The NiliMedix ADI intended use and indications for use were previously cleared by FDA for the predicate device.
NiliMedix ADI Insulin Pump -- 510k Notification
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for "NiliMEDIX" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the main logo, there is a smaller line of text that reads "Innovative Medical". The text is black and the background is white.
- · Performance tests demonstrate that the ADI Insulin Pump is as safe and effective as the predicate for its intended use
- · Safety and performance testing were implemented and found that the ADI Insulin Pump performs safe and effective.
Therefore, we believe that the ADI is substantially equivalent to its predicate device cited above without raising new safety and/or effectiveness issues.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its wings or body. The logo is encircled by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NiliMedix Limited C/O Mr. Yoram Levy Qsite 31 Haavoda Street Binyamina ISRAEL 30500
JUN - 6 2008
Re: K070844
Trade/Device Name: ADI Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5725 Regulation Name: Infusion Pump Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LZG Dated: May 18, 2008 Received: May 23, 2008
Dear Mr. Levy:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Levy
'Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Signature
Chiu Lin, Ph.D. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Nilimedix" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are black and appear to be slightly pixelated. Below the word, there is a thin, horizontal line with some indistinct text or markings.
INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
ADI
Indications for Use:
The NiliMedix ADI insulin pump is intended for the continuous delivery of insulin, at set and variable rates, for the management of diabetes mellitus in persons requiring insulin.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
AND/OR
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-off)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices 510(k) Number
Cinthia von
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number. K990844
1-6 NiliMedix ADI Insulin Pump - 510k Notification
§ 880.5725 Infusion pump.
(a)
Identification. An infusion pump is a device used in a health care facility to pump fluids into a patient in a controlled manner. The device may use a piston pump, a roller pump, or a peristaltic pump and may be powered electrically or mechanically. The device may also operate using a constant force to propel the fluid through a narrow tube which determines the flow rate. The device may include means to detect a fault condition, such as air in, or blockage of, the infusion line and to activate an alarm.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).