(30 days)
The Xplorer 2200 is intended for use by a qualified/trained doctor or technologist on both adult and pediatric patients for taking diagnostic radiographic exposures of the skull, spinal column, chest, abdomen, extremities, and other body parts on both adult and pediation patients and other, performed with patient sitting, standing or lying in the prone or supine positions.
The Xplorer 2200 (510k submission device) is not intended for mammography.
The Xplorer 2200 is a combination of two Xplorer 1000 CCD imagers, a previously marketed device covered by 510k K992955. One imager is in the Xplorer 1100 radiographic table, a previously marketed device covered by 510k K062417 and the other imager is on a vertical stand, a previously marketed device covered by 510k K062405. The system is operated in conjunction with a celling mounted X-ray tube/collimator assembly. The Xplorer 2200 system is manufactured by Imaging Dynamics. The CCD Imagers are unchanged from that which is marketed under K992955.
The provided text does not contain acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific performance criteria.
Instead, the document is a 510(k) summary for the Imaging Dynamics Xplorer 2200 Digital Radiographic System. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously legally marketed device (the predicate device) rather than presenting new performance data against acceptance criteria.
The key points from the provided text are:
- Device Description: The Xplorer 2200 is a combination of existing components (two Xplorer 1000 CCD imagers, an Xplorer 1100 radiographic table, and a vertical stand) with a ceiling-mounted X-ray tube/collimator assembly. The core imager technology is unchanged from a previously cleared device (K992955).
- Predicate Device: The Xplorer 1600 Digital Radiographic System (K042041).
- Comparison with Predicate Device: The manufacturer states that "The Xplorer 2200 is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Xplorer 1600. Xplorer 2200 device does not alter the fundamental scientific technology from Xplorer 1600 predicate device." The only modification is the integration of existing components.
- Non-clinical tests: Evaluated for performance, biocompatibility, thermal, electrical, and mechanical safety, and found substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
- Clinical tests: "No clinical tests conducted."
- Conclusion: The device was evaluated against the predicate device for all performance, safety & effectiveness requirements and found to be substantially equivalent.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information because the provided text explicitly states that no clinical tests were conducted to establish new performance data against specific acceptance criteria for the Xplorer 2200. The regulatory approval was based on the substantial equivalence to a predicate device, leveraging the performance data and established safety/effectiveness of its constituent components.
To answer your specific points:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not available. The submission relies on the substantial equivalence to the predicate device's performance, not new performance data for this specific combined system.
- Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. No clinical test set was used.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. No clinical test set was used.
- Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. No clinical test set was used.
- If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a digital radiographic system, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool, and no clinical study was conducted.
- If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is not an algorithm-only device.
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable. No clinical study was performed.
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. The device is not an AI algorithm requiring a training set in the conventional sense.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
In summary, the provided document details a Special 510(k) submission based on substantial equivalence and the integration of previously cleared components. It explicitly states that no new clinical tests were conducted for this specific permutation of the device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K06 3039
K063039 - Special 510 {K} Premarket Notification Imaging Dynamics Xplorer 2200 Digital Radiographic System
510k Summary
| 1. Submitter: | Imaging Dynamics Company LtdSuite 151, Pegasus Way NECalgary, AB,Canada T2E 8M5 | NOV - 2 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Contact person: | Shirantha SamarappuliManager - Regulatory AffairsTel: 403 251 9939; Fax: 403 251 1771 | |
| Date Prepared: | Oct 30, 2006 | |
| 2. Device Name: | Xplorer 2200 Digital Radiographic System, | |
| 3. Device Classification: | Class II, 892.1630 (MQB), 892.1680 (KPR), 892.1980 (IZZ) | |
| 4. Predicate Device: | Xplorer 1600 Digital Radiographic System (K042041) |
- The Xplorer 2200 is a combination of two Xplorer 1000 CCD imagers, a previously 5. Device Description: marketed device covered by 510k K992955. One imager is in the Xplorer 1100 radiographic table, a previously marketed device covered by 510k K062417 and the other imager is on a vertical stand, a previously marketed device covered by 510k K062405. The system is operated in conjunction with a celling mounted X-ray tube/collimator assembly. The Xplorer 2200 system is manufactured by Imaging Dynamics. The CCD Imagers are unchanged from that which is marketed under K992955.
-
- Indications for Use: The Xplorer 2200 is intended for use by a qualified/trained doctor or technologist on both adult and pediatric patients for taking diagnostic radiographic exposures of the skull, spinal column, chest, abdomen, extremities, and other body parts on both adult and pediations can be performed with patient sitting, standing or lying in the prone or supine positions. The Xplorer 2200 (510k submission device) is not intended for mammography.
- 7 . Comparison with predicate device: The Xplorer 2200 is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Xplorer 1600. Xplorer 2200 device does not alter the fundamental scientific technology from Xplorer 1600 predicate rlevice. The only modification attributed is the integration of Xplorer 2200 (510K Submission device) system which includes Xplorer 1590 Digital radiographic stand (K062405), Xplorer 1100 patient table (K062417) with Xplorer digital radiographic detector (K992955) and ceiling mounted x-ray tube/collimator assembly. Xplorer 2200 has the same intended use as the predicate device.
- Non-clinical tests: The device has been evaluated for performance, biocompatibility and effectiveness as a. well as thermal, electrical and mechanical safety and has been found to substantially equivalent to predicate device. The design and development process of the manufacturer conforms to 21 CFR part 820. ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 quality systems.
- Clinical tests; No clinical tests conducted. ف
- Conclusion: The device was evaluated against the predicate device (Xplorer 1600 K042041) for all C. performance, safety & effectiveness requirements and found as substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo features a stylized eagle-like symbol with three horizontal lines forming the body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol. The text is in all caps and in a sans-serif font.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Ms. Shirantha Samarappuli Manager-Regulatory Affairs Imaging Dynamics Co., Ltd. Suite 151, 2340 Pegasus Way NE Calgary, Alberta, T2E 8M5 CANADA
AUG 23 2013
Re: K063039
Trade/Device Name: Xplorer 2200 digital radiographic system Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MOB and KPR Dated: September 29, 2006 Received: October 3, 2006
Dear Ms. Samarrappuli:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of November 2, 2006.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into class II (Special Controls), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of
{2}------------------------------------------------
medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820). This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (301) 796-5450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely Yours,
Janine M. Morris
Janine M. Morri Acting Director Division of Radiological Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Special 510k Submission Xplorer 2200 Digital Radiographic System
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): _ _ 06303
Device Name: Xplorer 2200 digital radiographic system
Indications for Use:
The Xplorer 2200 is intended for use by a qualified/trained doctor or technologist on both adult and pediatric patients for taking diagnostic radiographic exposures of the skull, spinel column, chest, abdomen, extremities, and other body parts on both adult and pediation patients and other, performed with patient sitting, standing or lying in the prone or supine positions.
The Xplorer 2200 (510k submission device) is not intended for mammography.
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Reproductive, Abdominal,
and Radiological Devices
510(k) Number K063039
8
§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.