(87 days)
Not Found
No
The device description details a chemical reaction and spectrophotometric measurement, with no mention of AI/ML algorithms or data processing techniques that would indicate their use. The performance studies focus on standard analytical chemistry metrics and comparisons to predicate devices.
No
The device is an in vitro diagnostic assay used for measuring carbon dioxide in plasma and serum, which aids in diagnosis and treatment monitoring but does not directly provide therapy.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" states that the measurements are "used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentially serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance." This indicates its use in aiding diagnosis.
No
The device description clearly outlines a chemical assay involving reagents and a measurement of absorbance, indicating a hardware component (analyzer) is necessary for its function. It is an in vitro diagnostic assay, not a software-only device.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states that the device is "intended to measure bicarbonate/carbon dioxide in plasma, and serum." It also mentions that these measurements are used in the "diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentially serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance." This clearly indicates that the device is used to analyze samples taken from the human body for diagnostic purposes.
- Device Description: The "Device Description" further clarifies that it is an "in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative analysis of CO2 in human serum or plasma." The description of the chemical reaction involved also confirms that it is a laboratory test performed on biological samples.
- Performance Studies: The "Summary of Performance Studies" describes comparative studies and precision studies conducted on the assay, which are typical for evaluating the performance of an IVD.
- Predicate Device: The mention of a "Predicate Device(s)" with a K number (K032377) is a strong indicator that this device is being submitted for regulatory clearance as an IVD, as predicate devices are used to demonstrate substantial equivalence to existing legally marketed devices.
All of these points align with the definition and characteristics of an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Carbon Dioxide assay is used for the quantitation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in human serum or plasma.
The Carbon Dioxide test system, reagent and calibrator, is a device intended to measurc bicarbonate/carbon dioxide in plasma, and serum. Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentia!ly serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance.
Product codes
KHS
Device Description
Carbon Dioxide is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative analysis of CO2 in human serum or plasma. Carbon dioxide, as bicarbonate (HCO3), and phospho(enol)pyruvate (PEP) are converted to oxalacetate and phosphate in the reaction catalyzed by phospho(enol)pyruvate carboxylase (PEPC). Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) catalyzes the reduction of oxalacetate to malate with the concomitant oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) analog. The resulting decrease in absorbance at 404 nm is proportional to the CO2 content in the sample.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Comparative performance studies were conducted using the AEROSET® and ARCHITECT® c8000 Systems. The Carbon Dioxide assay method comparison yielded acceptable correlation with the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The AEROSET System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.994, slope of 0.99, and Y-intercept of - 0.20 mEq/L when compared to the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The ARCHITECT c8000 System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9893, slope of 0.98, and Y-intercept of -- 0.75 mEq/L when compared to the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The Carbon Dioxide assay method comparison yielded acceptable correlation between the AEROSET System and ARCHITECT c8000 System. The ARCHITECT c8000 System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.995, slope of 0.98 and Y-intercept of -0.55 mEq/L when compared to the AEROSET System. Precision studies were conducted using the Carbon Dioxide assay. On the AEROSET System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.0%, and Level 2 is 2.4%. On the ARCHITECT c8000 System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.1%, and Level 2 is 2.5%. The Carbon Dioxide assay is linear from 5 to 50 mEg/L. The functional sensitivity (limit of quantitation) of the Carbon Dioxide assay is 4 mg/dL and the limit of detection (LOD) 2 mEq/L. These data demonstrate that the performance of the Carbon Dioxide assay is substantially equivalent to the performance of the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
On the AEROSET System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.0%, and Level 2 is 2.4%. On the ARCHITECT c8000 System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.1%, and Level 2 is 2.5%. The Carbon Dioxide assay is linear from 5 to 50 mEg/L. The functional sensitivity (limit of quantitation) of the Carbon Dioxide assay is 4 mg/dL and the limit of detection (LOD) 2 mEq/L.
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 862.1160 Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide test system.
(a)
Identification. A bicarbonate/carbon dioxide test system is a device intended to measure bicarbonate/carbon dioxide in plasma, serum, and whole blood. Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentially serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
510(k) Summary
MAY - 4 2006
Submitter's Name/Address Abbott Laboratories 1921 Hurd Drive Irving, TX 75038
Contact Person Linda Morris Senior Regulatory Specialist MS 2-11 Regulatory Affairs (972) 518-6711 Fax (972) 518-7479
| Date of Preparation of this Summary: | February 3, 2006 |
|---|---|
| Device Trade or Proprietary Name: | Carbon Dioxide |
| Device Common/Usual Name or | |
| Classification Name: | Carbon Dioxide |
| Classification Number/Class: | KHS/Class II |
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K 060 295 .
Test Description:
Carbon Dioxide is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative analysis of CO2 in human serum or plasma. Carbon dioxide, as bicarbonate (HCO3), and phospho(enol)pyruvate (PEP) are converted to oxalacetate and phosphate in the reaction catalyzed by phospho(enol)pyruvate carboxylase (PEPC). Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) catalyzes the reduction of oxalacetate to malate with the concomitant oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) analog. The resulting decrease in absorbance at 404 nm is proportional to the CO2 content in the sample.
1
Substantial Equivalence:
The Carbon Dioxide assay is substantially equivalent to the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay (K032377) on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. Both assays yield similar Performance Characteristics.
Similarities:
- Both assays are in vitro enzymatic assays. .
- Both assays can be used for the quantitative analysis of carbon dioxide. .
- Both assays yield similar results. .
- Both assays are based on the PEP Carboxylase methodology. *
Differences:
None
Intended Use:
The Carbon Dioxide assay is used for the quantitation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in human serum or plasma.
2
Performance Characteristics:
Comparative performance studies were conducted using the AEROSET® and ARCHITECT® c8000 Systems. The Carbon Dioxide assay method comparison yielded acceptable correlation with the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The AEROSET System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.994, slope of 0.99, and Y-intercept of - 0.20 mEq/L when compared to the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The ARCHITECT c8000 System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9893, slope of 0.98, and Y-intercept of -- 0.75 mEq/L when compared to the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The Carbon Dioxide assay method comparison yielded acceptable correlation between the AEROSET System and ARCHITECT c8000 System. The ARCHITECT c8000 System showed a correlation coefficient of 0.995, slope of 0.98 and Y-intercept of -0.55 mEq/L when compared to the AEROSET System. Precision studies were conducted using the Carbon Dioxide assay. On the AEROSET System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.0%, and Level 2 is 2.4%. On the ARCHITECT c8000 System, the total %CV for Level 1 is 2.1%, and Level 2 is 2.5%. The Carbon Dioxide assay is linear from 5 to 50 mEg/L. The functional sensitivity (limit of quantitation) of the Carbon Dioxide assay is 4 mg/dL and the limit of detection (LOD) 2 mEq/L. These data demonstrate that the performance of the Carbon Dioxide assay is substantially equivalent to the performance of the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer.
Conclusion:
:
The Carbon Dioxide assay is substantially equivalent to the Carbon Dioxide (CO2L) assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer as demonstrated by results obtained in the studies.
CO2 - Conc. 510(k) February 3, 2006
3
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its wings or feathers. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Linda Morris Senior Regulatory Specialist Regulatory Affairs Abbott Laboratories 1921 Hurd Drive Irvine, TX 75038
MAY - 4 2006
K060295 Re: Trade/Device Name: Carbon Dioxide Regulation Number: 21 CFR§862.1160 Regulation Name: Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide test system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KHS Dated: February 3, 2006 Received: February 15, 2006
Dear Ms. Morris:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820).
4
Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial your device of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific information about the application of labeling requirements to your device, or questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (240) 276-0484. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to prematies notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll the mediation in (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours.
Albert G. A
Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
5
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: _______Carbon Dioxide
Indications For Use:
The Carbon Dioxide test system, reagent and calibrator, is a device intended to measurc bicarbonate/carbon dioxide in plasma, and serum. Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentia!ly serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 80 l Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Devices (OIVD)
Division/Sign-Off
Page 1 of 1
Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Office of and Safety
510(k) K060295