(12 days)
The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System is indicated for temporary internal fixation and stabilization of osteotomies and fractures, including:
- Comminuted fractures
- Supracondylar fractures .
- Intra-articular and extra-articular condylar fractures .
- . Fractures in osteopenic bone
- . Nonunions
- Malunions .
The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System is a plate and screw system intended for internal fracture fixation. The low-profile periarticular locking plate is anatomically contoured and has threaded holes which accept locking screws to create a stable, fixed angle construct.
The provided document refers to the Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plate System, a plate and screw system for internal fracture fixation.
Crucially, no acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets specific performance criteria are described in the provided text.
Here's an breakdown based on the information available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| NONE STATED | "The results of non-clinical (laboratory) performance testing and analysis demonstrate that the device is safe and effective." |
Explanation: The document explicitly states that "Clinical data and conclusions were not needed for this device." The basis for clearance is substantial equivalence to a predicate device, supported by non-clinical laboratory performance testing. However, no specific performance metrics or acceptance criteria for this non-clinical testing are provided.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Sample Size: Not applicable, as no clinical test set was used. "Non-clinical (laboratory) performance testing and analysis" was performed, but no details on sample size for these tests are provided.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable, as no clinical data was used.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts:
- Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring expert ground truth was used.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring adjudication was used.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No MRMC study was done. This device is a physical medical device (bone plates and screws), not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
- No standalone algorithm performance study was done. This device is a physical medical device, not a software algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- Not applicable, as no clinical data or ground truth in the traditional sense was used for this 510(k) submission. The safety and effectiveness were demonstrated through "non-clinical (laboratory) performance testing and analysis" and comparison to a predicate device, rather than clinical outcome-based ground truth.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not applicable, as no training set for a machine learning model was used.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- Not applicable, as no training set for a machine learning model was used.
Summary of Device Evaluation Approach:
The Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plate System received 510(k) clearance based on substantial equivalence to a previously cleared predicate device (Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plates, K042598). The submission documents state:
- "The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System has the same intended use, operates with the same fundamental scientific technology, is manufactured from the same materials using similar processes, and is similar in design to the predicate device."
- "The results of non-clinical (laboratory) performance testing and analysis demonstrate that the device is safe and effective."
- "Clinical data and conclusions were not needed for this device."
Therefore, the "proof" that the device meets safety and effectiveness criteria relies on bench testing (non-clinical laboratory performance testing) and the demonstration of substantial equivalence to an already approved device, rather than specific clinical acceptance criteria met through a detailed study.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "zimmer" in a bold, sans-serif font. The "z" is stylized and enclosed in a circle. The word appears to be a logo or brand name.
JAN $ 1 2005
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
| Submitter: | Zimmer, Inc.P.O. Box 708Warsaw, IN 46581-0708 |
|---|---|
| Contact Person: | Noah J. Bartsch, MSSpecialist, Corporate Regulatory AffairsTelephone: (574) 371-8552Fax: (574) 372-4605 |
| Date: | January 18, 2005 |
| Trade Name: | Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plates |
| Classification Name | Plate, Fixation, BoneScrew, Fixation, Bone |
| Classification Reference: | 21 CFR § 888.3030, 3040 |
| Predicate Device: | Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Platesmanufactured by Zimmer, Inc., K042598, clearedOctober 29, 2004. |
| Device Description: | The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System is aplate and screw system intended for internalfracture fixation. The low-profile periarticularlocking plate is anatomically contoured and hasthreaded holes which accept locking screws tocreate a stable, fixed angle construct. |
| Intended Use: | The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System isindicated for temporary internal fixation andstabilization of osteotomies and fractures, includingcomminuted fractures, supracondylar fractures,intra-articular and extra-articular condylar fractures,fractures in osteopenic bone, nonunions, andmalunions. |
{1}------------------------------------------------
/
Comparison to Predicate Devices:
the same intended use, operates with the same fundamental scientific technology, is manufactured from the same materials using similar processes, and is similar in design to the predicate device.
The Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System has
Performance Data:
The results of non-clinical (laboratory) performance testing and analysis demonstrate that the device is safe and effective.
Clinical data and conclusions were not needed for this device.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/2 description: The image is a black and white logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter of the circle. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, with stylized wings and body.
JAN 3 1 2005
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Noah J. Bartsch, MS Specialist, Corporate Regulatory Affairs Zimmer, Inc. P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, Indiana 46581
Re: K050121 Trade/Device Name: Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plate System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HRS Dated: January 18, 2005 Received: January 19, 2005
Dear Mr. Bartsch:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -- Mr. Noah J. Bartsch, MS
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.huml.
Sincerely yours,
Mark A. Milken
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosurc
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
Zimmer® Periarticular Locking Plate System
Indications for Use:
The Periarticular Locking Plate System is indicated for temporary internal fixation and stabilization of osteotomies and fractures, including:
- Comminuted fractures
- Supracondylar fractures .
- Intra-articular and extra-articular condylar fractures .
- . Fractures in osteopenic bone
- . Nonunions
- Malunions .
Mark A. Mckissen
Division of General, Restorative. and Neurologica. Devi
510(k) Number K050121
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
()ver-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(Please do not write below this line - Continue on another page if needed)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Page 1 of 1
§ 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories.
(a)
Identification. Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.