(45 days)
Poly Q Garant L: Wash material for dual phase impression techniques. Poly Q Penta M: Impression material for monophase technique. Poly Q Penta H: Tray material for dual phase impression techniques.
Poly Q is classified as Impression material ( 21 C.F.R. § 872.3660) because it is a device intended to reproduce the structure of a patient's teeth. Poly Q will be available in three different viscosities, called Poly Q Garant™ L (light body), Poly Q Penta™ M (medium body) and Poly Q Penta™ H (heavy body). Poly Q Penta M and Poly Q Penta H are two component (base paste/catalyst) materials to automatically be mixed in dispensed in 3M ESPE's Pentamix™ device. Poly Q Garant L is a material designed to be used in 3M ESPE's mixing, dosing and dispensing device, Garant™.
The provided text describes the 510(k) premarket notification for the Poly Q impression materials (Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M, Poly Q Penta H). The submission mostly focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than presenting a detailed study with specific acceptance criteria and performance metrics in the format requested.
Therefore, many of the requested data points are not explicitly available in the provided text. However, based on the information provided, here's what can be extracted:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document broadly states that "To prove the effectiveness of Poly Q, the performance characteristics of Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M and Poly Q Penta H were compared to the respective predicate devices." However, it does not specify what those performance characteristics were, how they were measured, or what the acceptance criteria for those characteristics were. It only concludes that "the impression materials...are, in our opinion, substantially equivalent to the respective predicate devices." This implies that the performance was deemed acceptable if it was similar enough to the predicate devices.
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Not explicitly stated. Implied: Performance characteristics must be substantially equivalent to predicate devices (Impregum™ Garant™ L DuoSoft, Impregum™ Penta™ M Monosoft, Impregum™ Penta™ H DuoSoft). | Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M, and Poly Q Penta H were found to be substantially equivalent to their respective predicate devices. Specific performance metrics and quantifiable comparisons are not provided. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
Not explicitly stated. The document mentions "biocompatibility testing" and "performance characteristics comparison," but does not provide details on the sample sizes used for these tests or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
Not explicitly stated. The document does not describe a process of establishing ground truth with experts in the context of device performance testing.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
Not explicitly stated. Given the nature of a substantial equivalence submission for impression materials, it's unlikely that an adjudication method for a test set (as would be applicable for imaging or diagnostic algorithms) was employed or described in this type of document.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
No. This type of study is not mentioned or implied as it's typically used for AI-assisted diagnostic tools, which is not the nature of this device.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study:
This concept is not applicable to the Poly Q impression materials, as they are physical materials used by a human practitioner, not an algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
Not explicitly stated. For "performance characteristics," the ground truth would likely be established through standardized physical and chemical property tests, rather than expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the usual sense for diagnostic devices.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
Not applicable. As a physical impression material, there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
AUG 1 1 2003
K032001
510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
Submitter
| Company: | 3M ESPE AG |
|---|---|
| Street: | ESPE Platz |
| ZIP-Code, City: | D-82229 Seefeld |
| Federal State: | Bavaria |
| Country: | Germany |
| Establishment Registration Number: | 9611385 |
| Official Correspondent: | Dr. Andreas Petermann, |
| Manager U.S. Regulatory Affairs | |
| Phone: | 011-49-8152-700 1395 |
| Fax: | 011-49-8152-700 1869 |
| E-mail: | andreas.petermann@mmm.com |
| US Agent: | Don H. McKenzie |
| Regulatory Manager | |
| Phone: | 651-736-9286 |
| Fax: | 651-736-0990 |
| E-mail: | dhmckenzie@mmm.com |
| Date: | June 17, 2003 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
Name of Device
Proprietary Name:
Classification Name
Common Name:
Poly Q Garant™ L Poly Q Penta™ M Poly Q Penta™ H Impression material Dental impression material
Predicate Device:
| Poly Q GarantTM L: | ImpregumTM GarantTM L DuoSoft, K 994190 |
|---|---|
| Poly Q PentaTM M: | ImpregumTM PentaTM M Monosoft, K 994192 |
| Poly Q PentaTM H: | ImpregumTM PentaTM H DuoSoft, K 994193 |
Description for the Premarket Notification
Poly Q is classified as Impression material ( 21 C.F.R. § 872.3660) because it is a device intended to reproduce the structure of a patient's teeth.
Poly Q will be available in three different viscosities, called Poly Q Garant™ L (light body), Poly Q Penta™ M (medium body) and Poly Q Penta™ H (heavy body).
Poly Q Penta M and Poly Q Penta H are two component (base paste/catalyst) materials to automatically be mixed in dispensed in 3M ESPE's Pentamix™ device. Poly Q Garant L is a material designed to be used in 3M ESPE's mixing, dosing and dispensing device, Garant™.
To provide evidence for safety biocompatibility testing was carried out. The results show that Poly Q is a safe device.
To prove the effectiveness of Poly Q, the performance characteristics of Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M and Poly Q Penta H were compared to the respective predicate devices.
{2}------------------------------------------------
In summary, the impression materials Poly Q Garant L, Penta M and Penta H, described in this 510(k) premarket notification submission, are, in our opinion, substantially equivalent to the respective predicate devices.
し、 : ・
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the edge. In the center of the seal is a stylized image of a human face in profile, with three wavy lines extending from the face. The seal appears to be a logo or emblem for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 1 1 2003
Dr. Andreas Petermann Regulatory Manager, U.S Affairs 3M ESPE AG ESPE Platz 8229 Seefeld Bavaria, GERMANY
Re: K032001
Trade/Device Name: Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M, and Penta H Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3660 Regulation Name: Impression Material Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ELW Dated: June 17, 2003 Received: June 27, 2003
Dear Dr. Petermann:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Dr. Andreas Petermann
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits vour device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801). please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97) you may obtain. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours.
Susan Rooser
Susan Runner, DDS, MA Interim Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
人 032001 510(k) Number (if known): ___
Device Name: Poly Q (Poly Q Garant L, Poly Q Penta M, Poly Q Penta H)
Indications For Use:
Poly Q Garant L:
Wash material for dual phase impression techniques.
Poly Q Penta M:
Impression material for monophase technique.
Poly Q Penta H:
Tray material for dual phase impression techniques.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Robert Sbertz DDS for Dr K. Mulry
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital,
Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K032001
(Optional Format 3-10-98)
§ 872.3660 Impression material.
(a)
Identification. Impression material is a device composed of materials such as alginate or polysulfide intended to be placed on a preformed impression tray and used to reproduce the structure of a patient's teeth and gums. The device is intended to provide models for study and for production of restorative prosthetic devices, such as gold inlays and dentures.(b)
Classification. Class II (Special Controls).