K Number
K030243
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2003-04-23

(90 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3640
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

To replace missing tooth roots for single tooth, partial tooth, and fully edentulous patients. ENDURE endosseous implants are designed to become an Osseointegrated prosthesis allowing the attachment of a partial or a complete prosthodentic appliance in the mandible or maxilla.

Device Description

ENDURE endosseous implant

AI/ML Overview

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the ENDURE Endosseous Implant. It confirms that the device has been found substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. However, this document does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, nor does it typically include detailed information about clinical trials, performance metrics, ground truth, or expert qualifications in the way you've requested.

The 510(k) process primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which often relies on non-clinical performance data (e.g., mechanical testing, biocompatibility) rather than extensive clinical studies with specified acceptance criteria as one might see for novel, high-risk devices or software as a medical device (SaMD).

Therefore, based solely on the provided text, I cannot fill in the requested table and information. Most of the points you've asked for are related to clinical studies and performance evaluation that are not typically included in a 510(k) clearance letter itself.

To answer your questions, one would need to access the full 510(k) submission (if publicly available or by contacting the manufacturer), which would contain the detailed test reports and justification for substantial equivalence.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

APR 2 3 2003

Mr. J. Brad Vance Director of Regulatory Affairs & New Projects Coordinator IMTEC Corporation 2401 North Commerce Ardmore, Oklahoma 73401

Re: K030243

Trade/Device Name: ENDURE Endosseous Implant Regulation Number: 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Implant Regulatory Class: III Product Code: DZE Dated: January 19, 2003 Received: January 23, 2003

Dear Mr. Vance:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 -Mr. Vance

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html

Sincerely yours.

Susan Roemer

Susan Runner, DDS, MA Interim Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

November 19, 2002

K030243

SUBJECT:

510 (K) NOTIFICATION Endosseous Implant

ATTENTION: Document Mail Clerk

INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT

Device Name:

ENDURE endosseous implant

Indications for Use:

To replace missing tooth roots for single tooth, partial tooth, and fully edentulous patients.

ENDURE endosseous implants are designed to become an Osseointegrated prosthesis allowing the attachment of a partial or a complete prosthodentic appliance in the mandible or maxilla.

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Krie Mulvey for KSR

ion of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, on Control, Dental Device


510(k) Number: K030243

Prescription Use Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)

OR

Over the Counter

§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.