(60 days)
The intended use for the AART Chin Implant is augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. It is intended to be inserted via intra-oral or submental incision.
The intended use for the AART Chin Implant is for cosmetic augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. It is intended to be inserted via intra-oral or submental incision.
The AART Chin Implants are manufactured from a medical grade silicone elastomer that has been molded into various crescent shaped convex implants. They are provided in seven styles with dimensions varying in length, width, and height. The AART Chin Implants are intended to be used for augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. The surface characteristic of the implant is smooth. The AART Chin Implants will be offered sterile and non-sterile.
This is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device, the AART Chin Implant. It is not a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the way a diagnostic AI/ML device would be evaluated. Instead, this document demonstrates substantial equivalence to predicate devices already on the market. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, and AI/ML specific evaluations are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this document.
Here's an analysis based on the provided document:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
This document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria or device performance in the way a clinical study would for a diagnostic or AI/ML device. The "acceptance criteria" here implicitly refer to the demonstration of substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices in terms of material, design, function, and performance, which allows the device to be marketed.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied for 510(k) Substantial Equivalence) | Reported Device Performance (as per document) |
|---|---|
| Material equivalence to predicate devices | Manufactured from medical grade silicone elastomer, same as predicate devices. |
| Design equivalence to predicate devices | Molded into various crescent shaped convex implants; seven styles with varying dimensions, similar to predicate devices. |
| Functional equivalence to predicate devices | Intended for augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour, identical to predicate devices. |
| Performance equivalence to predicate devices | Not explicitly detailed in quantitative terms for performance, but implied through substantial equivalence to predicate devices. |
| Sterilization following established standards | Sterilized by Gamma radiation, cycle validated following ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1994 standard. |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
Not applicable. This is a 510(k) submission based on substantial equivalence to existing devices, not a study involving a test set of data for performance evaluation in the context of AI/ML or diagnostics.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. Ground truth for a test set is not established in this type of submission.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. No test set or adjudication method is described.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device, and no MRMC study is mentioned.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
Not applicable. There is no ground truth, expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data used in the typical sense of a performance study for this type of device. The "ground truth" for this submission is the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate devices.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. No training set is involved as this is not an AI/ML device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. No training set is involved.
{0}------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
510(k) Summary
April 29,2002
| Contact Information: | Aesthetic and Reconstructive Technologies, Inc. (AART)3545 Airway Drive, Suite 108Reno, NV 89511(775) 853-6800 / FAX (775) 853-6805Winston A. Andrews |
|---|---|
| Proprietary Name: | AART Chin Implant |
| Common Name: | Silicone Elastomer Chin Implant |
| Classification Name: | Prosthesis, Chin, Internal |
Substantial Equivalence: The AART Chin Implant is substantially equivalent in function, design, performance and materials to the Duralastic Anatomical Chin Implant marketed by Allied Biomedical Corporation of Ventura, CA and the Seare Biomedical Chin Implant marketed by Seare Biomedical Corp. of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Device Description: The AART Chin Implants are manufactured from a medical grade silicone elastomer that has been molded into various crescent shaped convex implants. They are provided in seven styles with dimensions varying in length, width, and height. The AART Chin Implants are intended to be used for augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. The surface characteristic of the implant is smooth. The AART Chin Implants will be offered sterile and non-sterile.
Intended Use: The intended use for the AART Chin Implant is augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. It is intended to be inserted via intra-oral or submental incision.
Predicate Device: The AART Chin Implant is substantially equivalent in material, design, function, and performance to the Duralastic Anatomical Chin Implant marketed by Allied Biomedical Corp. and the Seare Biomedical Chin Implant marketed by Seare Biomedical Corp. All products have identical intended uses and are offered in similar shapes and sizes.
Sterilization Cycle: The AART Chin Implant will be sterilized by Gamma radiation. The sterilization cycle will be determined and validated following the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1994 standard "Sterilization of health care products - Requirements for validation and routine control -Radiation sterilization".
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three human profiles incorporated into its design. The profiles are arranged in a way that they form the body and wing of the eagle. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food .and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUL = 2 2002
Aesthetic and Reconstructive Technologies, Inc. c/o Ms. Catherine Riple 3545 Airway Drive, Suite 108 Reno, Nevada 89511
Re: K021417 Trade Name: AART Chin Implant Regulation Number: 878.3550 Regulation Name: Prosthesis, Chin Implant Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FWP Dated: April 29, 2002 Received: May 3, 2002
Dear Ms. Riple:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Catherine Riple
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, (Misbranding by reference to premarket notification( (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address HYPERLINK http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Stypt Rhode
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
AMENUMEN 1
Page / of
| 510(k) NUMBER (IF KNOWN) : | K021417 |
|---|---|
| DEVICE NAME: | AART Chin Implant |
INDICATIONS FOR USE:
The intended use for the AART Chin Implant is for cosmetic augmentation and reconstruction of the chin or anterior mandibular contour. It is intended to be inserted via intra-oral or submental incision.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NERDED.)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
્વાર
Over-The-Counter-Use er The Councer 650-96)
Styph Rurdee
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices
KOZ 1417 510(k) Number_
§ 878.3550 Chin prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A chin prosthesis is a silicone rubber solid device intended to be implanted to augment or reconstruct the chin.(b)
Classification. Class II.