(1952 days)
Not Found
Not Found
No
The description focuses on ultrasonic sensors and control logic for air detection and removal, with no mention of AI or ML terms or concepts.
Yes
This device is designed to prevent a harmful medical condition (air embolism) during intravenous administration, directly contributing to patient safety and health outcomes.
No
The device is an automated air removal system for IV lines. While it uses sensors to detect air (a form of 'detection'), its primary function is to actively remove the air (intervention), not to provide a diagnosis of a patient's condition or to identify a disease or medical condition.
No
The device description explicitly states that the AirPurge System consists of two main components: a control unit and a disposable unit. These are physical hardware components, not solely software.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for the "detection and automatic removal of air in intravenous (I.V.) lines during administration of intravenous solutions, blood and blood products." This is a therapeutic and safety function related to the delivery of substances into the body, not the analysis of samples taken from the body.
- Device Description: The device description focuses on the mechanical and electronic components that detect and remove air from the IV line. It does not mention any components or processes related to analyzing biological samples.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing blood, urine, tissue, or any other biological sample. The device interacts with the fluid within the IV line, not with a sample taken from the patient for diagnostic purposes.
IVD devices are used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for diagnostic, monitoring, or compatibility purposes. This device's function falls outside of that definition.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The AirPurge™ System is intended for detection and automatic removal of air in intravenous (I.V.) lines during administration of intravenous solutions, blood and blood products. It is indicated for use in the Operating Room and post anesthesia care areas. The AirPurge™ System is placed distal to I.V. bags using gravity feed or pressure, and may be used with or without fluid warmers.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OKL
Device Description
The Airpurge System (AirPurge) is intended to detect and automatically remove air from an IV infusion line. Airpurge consists of two main components, the control unit and the disposable unit. The disposable unit (Figure-1a) contains the system fluid path and is a sterile, single-use component. This disposable unit is loaded onto the control unit (Figure-1b). The door of the control unit is then closed. Once the device is connected to the infusion line and primed, it uses an ultrasonic sensor to detect air in the infusion line. When air is detected, the device system closes the patient line and diverts the fluid flow to the waste collection bag. A second ultrasonic sensor detects when the air has been removed from the IV line and causes the controller to return the infusion flow back to the patient.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Operating Room and post anesthesia care areas.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
A series of non-clinical studies, summarized in Table 1, were conducted to verify that the AirPurge System performs as intended. These particular studies were chosen because of their relationship to demonstrating that the AirPurge System device hazards have been adequately addressed. The hazards are dependent on the context of use (e.g., indicated uses, use environments and users) and the device specific design.
Table 1 - AirPurge System Nonclinical Studies Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
---|---|---|---|
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | ||
Component Reliability Assessment | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | |
Flow Rate | Pass | ||
Fluid Loss | Characterize the fluid loss per air removal cycle as a function of flow rate. Results included in labeling. | Characterization Test Flow Rate Fluid Volume Loss per Purge 600mL/min 10 mL 300mL/hr 0.1 mL | |
Limits of Air Detection | Characterize the minimum air volume detection and removal capability of the device. | Characterization Test Minimum Detectable Air Volume 25 microliter | |
Safety Controls | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | |
Fluid Ingress | Pass | ||
Biocompatibility | Demonstrate that contamination hazards caused by non-biocompatible device components are adequately addressed. | See biocompatibility review summary | Pass |
Sterilization | Demonstrate that contamination hazards caused by non-sterile device components are adequately addressed. | See sterilization review summary | Pass |
Shelf Life | Support the labeled(b)(4) TS Formula shelf life for disposable units. (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Demonstrate sterile barrier packaging integrity and functional performance. | Pass |
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | ||
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety | Demonstrate that electrical hazards are adequately addressed. | Demonstrate conformance to relevant aspects of the following standards: (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process Appropriate information is included in the AirPurge System instructions for use.. | Pass |
Software | Demonstrate that the software is adequately verified and validated for its intended use. | See software review summary | Pass |
Human Factors | Demonstrate that the design of the AirPurge System has adequately addressed potential use error hazards that may result in patient harm. | See human factors review summary | Pass |
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
- Response Time: Less than 60 milliseconds
- Minimum Detectable Air Volume: 25 microliter
- Minimum Flow Rate: 1 mL/hr
- Maximum Flow Rate: 600 mL/hr
- Fluid Volume Loss per Purge:
- 600mL/min: 10 mL
- 300mL/hr: 0.1 mL
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Not Found
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 880.5445 Intravascular administration set, automated air removal system.
(a)
Identification. An intravascular administration set, automated air removal system, is a prescription device used to detect and automatically remove air from an intravascular administration set with minimal to no interruption in the flow of the intravascular fluid. The device may include an air identification mechanism, software, an air removal mechanism, tubing, apparatus to collect removed air, and safety control mechanisms to address hazardous situations.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Provide an argument demonstrating that all reasonably foreseeable hazards have been adequately addressed with respect to the persons for whose use the device is represented or intended and the conditions of use for the device, which includes the following:
(i) Description of the device indications for use, design, and technology, use environments, and users in sufficient detail to determine that the device complies with all special controls.
(ii) Demonstrate that controls are implemented to address device system hazards and their causes.
(iii) Include a justification supporting the acceptability criteria for each hazard control.
(iv) A traceability analysis demonstrating that all credible hazards have at least one corresponding control and that all controls have been verified and validated in the final device design.
(2) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(3) The device parts that directly or indirectly contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of fluid path contacting components and the shelf life of these components.
(5) The device must be designed and tested for electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
(6) Nonclinical performance testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Device system and component reliability testing must be conducted.
(ii) Fluid ingress protection testing must be conducted.
(iii) Testing of safety controls must be performed to demonstrate adequate mitigation of hazardous situations, including sensor failure, flow control failure, improper device position, device malfunction, infusion delivery error, and release of air to the patient.
(7) A human factors validation study must demonstrate that use hazards are adequately addressed.
(8) The labeling must include the following:
(i) The device's air identification and removal response time.
(ii) The device's minimum air volume identification sensitivity.
(iii) The minimum and maximum flow rates at which the device is capable of reliably detecting and removing air.
(iv) Quantification of any fluid loss during device air removal operations as a function of flow rate.
0
DE NOVO CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FOR AIRPURGE SYSTEM
REGULATORY INFORMATION
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
INTRAVASCULAR ADMINISTRATION SET, AUTOMATED AIR REMOVAL SYSTEM
An intravascular administration set, automated air removal system is a prescription device used to detect and automatically remove air from an intravascular administration set with minimal to no interruption in the flow of the intravascular fluid. The device may include an air identification mechanism, software, an air removal mechanism, tubing, apparatus to collect removed air, and safety control mechanisms to address hazardous situations.
NEW REGULATION NUMBER: 21 CFR 880.5445
CLASSIFICATION: Class II
PRODUCT CODE: OKL
BACKGROUND
DEVICE NAME: AirPurge System
SUBMISSION NUMBER: K080644
DATE OF DE NOVO: October 29, 2008
- CONTACT: Anesthesia Safety Products, LLC 155-M New Boston Street, Suite 127 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801
REQUESTER'S RECOMMENDED CLASSIFICATION: Class II
INDICATIONS FOR USE
The AirPurge™ System is intended for detection and automatic removal of air in intravenous (I.V.) lines during administration of intravenous solutions, blood and blood products. It is indicated for use in the Operating Room and post anesthesia care areas. The AirPurge™ System is placed distal to I.V. bags using gravity feed or pressure, and may be used with or without fluid warmers.
LIMITATIONS Prescription use only
1
Limitations on device use are also achieved through the following statements included in the Instructions for Use Manual:
Warning: The safety and effectiveness of the AirPurge System has not been evaluated for use with active infusion devices. such as drug infusion pumps and hemodialysis systems.
Caution: The AirPurge™ System is not a replacement for human vigilance. I.V. lines should always be monitored for signs of entrapped air.
Caution: All Users must be trained; training is required for the safe and proper use of the AirPurge™ System.
Caution: The AirPurge™ System is not a replacement for the proper handling of I.V. setups.
Air Identification and Removal Specifications:
-
- The device's air identification and removal response time.
Image /page/1/Figure/7 description: The image shows a table with two rows. The first row contains the text "Response Time" in bold font. The second row contains the text "Less than 60 milliseconds".
- The device's air identification and removal response time.
-
- The device's minimum air volume identification sensitivity
Minimum Detectable Air Volume |
---|
25 microliter |
-
- The minimum and maximum flow rates at which the device is capable of reliably detecting and removing air.
Flow Rate Specifications | |
---|---|
Minimum Flow Rate | 1 mL/hr |
Maximum Flow Rate | 600 mL/hr |
-
- Quantification of any fluid loss during device air removal operations as a function of flow rate.
| Flow Rate | Fluid Volume Loss
per Purge |
|-----------|--------------------------------|
| 600mL/min | 10 mL |
| 300mL/hr | 0.1 mL |
PLEASE REFER TO THE LABELING FOR A MORE COMPLETE LIST OF WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS.
2
DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Airpurge System (AirPurge) is intended to detect and automatically remove air from an IV infusion line.
Image /page/2/Picture/2 description: The image shows a medical device with clear tubing and connections. The device is labeled with terms like 'PRIMARY,' 'FRONT,' and 'EXTENSION,' indicating its function in a medical setting. One image shows the device mounted on a machine, while the other shows it hanging on a wall.
Figure-1a, Disposable Unit
Figure-1b, Control Unit
Airpurge consists of two main components, the control unit and the disposable unit. The disposable unit (Figure-1a) contains the system fluid path and is a sterile, single-use component. This disposable unit is loaded onto the control unit (Figure-1b). The door of the control unit is then closed. Once the device is connected to the infusion line and primed, it uses an ultrasonic sensor to detect air in the infusion line. When air is detected, the device system closes the patient line and diverts the fluid flow to the waste collection bag. A second ultrasonic sensor detects when the air has been removed from the IV line and causes the controller to return the infusion flow back to the patient.
SUMMARY OF NONCLINICAL/BENCH STUDIES
3
A series of non-clinical studies, summarized in Table 1, were conducted to verify that the AirPurge System performs as intended. These particular studies were chosen because of their relationship to demonstrating that the AirPurge System device hazards have been adequately addressed. The hazards are dependent on the context of use (e.g., indicated uses, use environments and users) and the device specific design.
| Table 1 - AirPurge System Nonclinical Studies
Test | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | ||||||||
Component | |||||||||
Reliability | |||||||||
Assessment | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | |||||||
Flow Rate | Pass | ||||||||
Fluid Loss | Characterize the fluid loss per air | ||||||||
removal cycle as a function of flow | |||||||||
rate. Results included in labeling. | Characterization Test | ||||||||
Flow Rate Fluid Volume Loss | |||||||||
per Purge 600mL/min 10 mL 300mL/hr 0.1 mL | |||||||||
Limits of Air | |||||||||
Detection | Characterize the minimum air volume | ||||||||
detection and removal capability of | |||||||||
the device. | Characterization Test | ||||||||
Minimum Detectable Air | |||||||||
Volume 25 microliter | |||||||||
Safety Controls | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass |
System Nonelinical Studi Tablo 1
4
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | |||
---|---|---|---|
Fluid Ingress | Pass | ||
Biocompatibility | Demonstrate that contamination | ||
hazards caused by non-biocompatible | |||
device components are adequately | |||
addressed. | See biocompatibility | ||
review summary | Pass | ||
Sterilization | Demonstrate that contamination | ||
hazards caused by non-sterile device | |||
components are adequately | |||
addressed. | See sterilization | ||
review summary | Pass | ||
Shelf Life | Support the labeled(b)(4) TS Formula shelf life | ||
for disposable units. | |||
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Demonstrate sterile | ||
barrier packaging | |||
integrity and | |||
functional | |||
performance. | Pass | ||
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | ||
Electromagnetic | |||
Compatibility | |||
and Electrical | Demonstrate that electrical hazards | ||
are adequately addressed. | Demonstrate | ||
conformance to | |||
relevant aspects of | Pass | ||
Safety | the following | ||
standards: | |||
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | |||
Appropriate | |||
information is | |||
included in the | |||
AirPurge System | |||
instructions for use.. | |||
Software | Demonstrate that the software is | ||
adequately verified and validated for | |||
its intended use. | See software review | ||
summary | Pass | ||
Human Factors | Demonstrate that the design of the | ||
AirPurge System has adequately | |||
addressed potential use error hazards | |||
that may result in patient harm. | See human factors | ||
review summary | Pass | ||
Test | Method | Results | |
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process | Pass | ||
Pass | |||
Pass | |||
Pass | |||
Pass | |||
Pass | |||
Pass | |||
Pass |
5
BIOCOMPATIBILITY/MATERIALS
The biocompatibility and hemocompatibility (Table 2) testing included those tests recommended by FDA memorandum G95-1 entitled "Use of International Standard ISO 10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 1: Evaluation and Testing' for externally communicating devices, prolonged duration, blood path, indirect devices.
6
The results of this testing demonstrated the disposable components of the AirPurge System is biocompatible when used as intended.
Table 2 - Biocompatibility Tests
STERILITY
Sterilization specifications (Table 3) were evaluated in a similar manner as IV administration sets.
Table 3 - Sterilization Data
Sterilization Information | Methods / Results |
---|---|
Sterilization Method | Ethylene Oxide |
Sterilant Residuals | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process |
Sterilization Validation Method | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11135 |
Sterility assurance level (SAL): | 10-6 |
Pyrogenicity Evaluation | (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process |
7
Pass | |
---|---|
Sterile Barrier Packaging | The sterile components are packaged in a |
Tyvek/Poly pouch. |
SOFTWARE
Software for the device consisted of proprietary software. The device software was reviewed and the provided documentation (Table 4) was found adequate and consistent with a 'MAJOR' Level of Concern , as defined in FDA's "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices," issued on May 11, 2005.
FDA's review of the documentation determined that the documentation is complete and deemed acceptable.
Level of Concern: Major | |
---|---|
Software description: | Acceptable |
Device Hazard Analysis: | Yes |
Software Requirements Specifications: | Yes |
Architecture Design Chart: | Yes |
Design Specifications: | Yes |
Traceability Analysis/Matrix: | Yes |
Development: | Yes |
Verification & Validation Testing: | Yes |
Revision level history: | Yes |
Unresolved anomalies: | Yes |
Table 4 - Software Documentation | |
---|---|
---------------------------------- | -- |
HUMAN FACTORS
A human factors study was conducted (b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process
A final human factors study report was reviewed for the following information:
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process
8
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process
Based on the results of the study, Anesthesia Safety Products will require that all users Bases of the proper use of the AirPurge Systembly Trades Will Indessere Formula & Foo
A user task analysis identified the following tasks necessary for use of the device seret Formula &
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process
Specific use errors observed included:
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Process
LABELING
(b)(4) Trade Secret Formula & Pro
In addition to meeting the general labeling controls for prescription devices under 21 CFR 801.109, the following specific labeling controls, as identified in Table 5, are included and necessary to reasonably ensure safety and effectiveness of the AirPurge System:
Table 5 - Labeling Controls
Labeling Control | AirPurge System Data |
---|---|
The device's air identification and | |
removal response time. | 60 milliseconds |
The device's minimum air volume | |
identification sensitivity | 25 microliters |
9
| The minimum and maximum flow rates
at which the device is capable of
reliably detecting and removing air. | Minimum: 1 mL/hr
Maximum: 600 mL/min | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Quantification of any fluid loss during
device air removal operations as a
function of flow rate. | Flow Rate | Fluid Volume Loss per
Purge |
| | 600mL/min | 10 mL |
| | 300mL/hr | 0.1 mL |
RISKS TO HEALTH
Table 6 identifies the risks to health that may be associated with use of an intravascular administration set automated air removal system and the measures necessary to mitigate these risks.
Risk | Mitigation |
---|---|
Embolus | Hazard Argument |
Software | |
Electromagnetic Compatibility | |
Human Factors | |
Labeling | |
Non-clinical Performance Testing | |
Infusion delivery error | Hazard Argument |
Software | |
Electromagnetic Compatibility | |
Human Factors | |
Labeling | |
Non-clinical Performance Testing | |
Electric Shock | Hazard Argument |
Electrical Safety | |
Electromagnetic Compatibility | |
Adverse Tissue Reaction | Hazard Argument |
Biocompatibility | |
Infection | Sterilization |
Shelf Life |
Table 6 - Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
SPECIAL CONTROLS:
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the AirPurge System is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Provide an argument demonstrating that all reasonably foreseeable hazards have been adequately addressed with respect to the persons for whose use the device is represented or intended and the conditions of use for the device, which includes the following:
- (i) Description of the device indications for use, design and technology, use environments, and users in sufficient detail to determine that the device complies with all special controls.
10
- (ii) Demonstrate that controls are implemented to address device system hazards and their causes.
- (iii)Include a justification supporting the acceptability criteria for each hazard control.
- (iv)A traceability analysis demonstrating that all credible hazards have at least one corresponding control and that all controls have been verified and validated in the final device design.
- (2) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
- (3) The device parts that directly or indirectly contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
- (4) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of fluid path contacting components and the shelf-life of these components.
- (5) The device must be designed and tested for electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
- (6) Non-clinical performance testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
- (i) Device system and component reliability testing must be conducted.
- (ii) Fluid ingress protection testing must be conducted.
- (iii)Testing of safety controls must be performed to demonstrate adequate mitigation of hazardous situations, including sensor failure, flow control failure, improper device position, device malfunction, infusion delivery error, and release of air to the patient.
- (7) A human factors validation study must demonstrate that use hazards are adequately addressed.
- (8) The labeling must include the following:
- (i) The device's air identification and removal response time.
- (ii) The device's minimum air volume identification sensitivity.
- (iii)The minimum and maximum flow rates at which the device is capable of reliably detecting and removing air.
- (iv)Quantification of any fluid loss during device air removal operations as a function of flow rate.
In addition, this is a prescription device and must comply with 21 CFR 801.109.
IT/RISK DETERMINATION
11
The primary review criteria used to evaluate the device are the device's capability to detect and remove air from an infusion line. The characteristics evaluated are
- Air detection and removal response time ●
- Minimum air volume identification sensitivity
- Minimum and Maximum flow rates at which the device is capable of reliably detecting ● and removing air
Quantification of fluid loss during air removal operations as a function of flow rate ) Trade Secret Formula & Proce
Many devices that include air detection mechanisms stop the drug delivery when the air is detected. The expected benefit of the Airpurge device is the prevention of air infusion coupled with the minimization of drug delivery interruptions.
In conclusion, given the available information above, the data support that for detection and automatic removal of air in intravenous (I.V.) lines during administration of intravenous solutions, blood and blood products, the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks for the AirPurge System. The device provides benefits and the risks can be mitigated by
CONCLUSION
The de novo for the AirPurge System is granted and the device is classified under the following:
Product Code: OKL Device Type: Intravascular Administration Set, Automated Air Removal System Class: II Regulation: 21 CFR 880.5445