TEARLAB OSMOLARITY SYSTEM

K083184 · Ocusense, Inc. · OND · May 14, 2009 · Clinical Chemistry

Device Facts

Record IDK083184
Device NameTEARLAB OSMOLARITY SYSTEM
ApplicantOcusense, Inc.
Product CodeOND · Clinical Chemistry
Decision DateMay 14, 2009
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 862.1540
Device ClassClass 1

Intended Use

The TearLab Osmolarity System is intended to measure the osmolarity of human tears to aid in the diagnosis of patients with signs or symptoms of dry eye disease, in conjunction with other methods of clinical evaluation.

Device Story

Device measures tear osmolarity to aid dry eye disease diagnosis. Input: 40-50 nanoliters of tear fluid collected via passive capillary action into microfluidic Test Card. Operation: Test Card attached to Pen; Pen measures tear fluid impedance via electrodes; Pen docked to Reader; Reader downloads impedance data, calculates osmolarity using lot-specific calibration curve, and displays numerical value (mOsms/L). Used in clinical settings by healthcare providers. Output provides quantitative osmolarity value; assists clinicians in assessing tear film hyperosmolarity; supports dry eye diagnosis in conjunction with other clinical evaluations.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing included precision studies (single instrument, between-instrument, lot-to-lot, between-site) using contrived tear specimens (275–400 mOsms/L). Method comparison against Wescor 5520 Vapro showed strong correlation (R-squared 0.9443-0.9515). Diagnostic performance evaluated via meta-analysis (n=1,436) and multicenter study (n=140); meta-analysis reported 69% sensitivity and 92% specificity at 316 mOsms/L cutoff. Multicenter study reported 64% sensitivity and 71% specificity.

Technological Characteristics

System comprises Reader, Pen, Electronic Check Cards, single-use microfluidic Test Cards, and Control Solutions. Sensing principle: electrical impedance measurement of tear fluid. Connectivity: Pen-to-Reader data transfer. Calibration: lot-specific curves. Quantitative output in mOsms/L.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients suspected of having dry eye disease to aid in diagnosis by measuring tear osmolarity.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An osmolality test system is a device intended to measure ionic and nonionic solute concentration in body fluids, such as serum and urine. Osmolality measurement is used as an adjunct to other tests in the evaluation of a variety of diseases, including kidney diseases (e.g., chronic progressive renal failure), diabetes insipidus, other endocrine and metabolic disorders, and fluid imbalances.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Section VI #### OcuSense, Inc., TearLab Osmolarity System 1 4 2009 510(k) Summary Intended Use & Indications for Use OcuSense, Inc. 12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 Phone: (858) 794-1422 Facsimile: (858) 794-1493 Contact Person: Michael Berg, VP Clinical & Regulatory Operations Date Prepared: May 5, 2009 Name of Device: TearLab™ Osmolarity System Name/Address of Sponsor: OcuSense, Inc., 12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92130 Common or Usual Name: Osmometer Classification Name: Osmometer for Clinical Use ### Predicate Devices: 1) Wescor, Inc., 5520 Vapro® Vapor Pressure Osmometer (Class 1, Exempt) 2) Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Schirmer Tear Test (Class I, Exempt) - 3) Touch Scientific, Inc., Touch Tear IgE Microassay Kit (Class II, K991316) - 4) Dia-Screen Corp., Diascreen Reagent Strips (Class I, Non-exempt, K971976) ### Intended Use & Indications for Use: The TearLab Osmolarity System is intended to measure the osmolarity of human tears to aid in the diagnosis of patients with signs or symptoms of dry eye disease, in conjunction with other methods of clinical evaluation. Image /page/0/Picture/18 description: The image shows the word "OcuSense" in a stylized font. The word is slightly curved upwards, with a line underneath the left and right sides of the word. The font appears to be a serif font, and the letters are all connected. Tear Testing Made Simple™ {1}------------------------------------------------ ### Section VI 510(k) Summary Technological Characteristics ### Device Description The TearLab Osmolarity System is intended to measure the osmolarity of human tears to aid in the cliagnosis of patients with signs or symptoms of dry eye disease, in conjunction with other methods of clinical evaluation. The device consists of the following components and accessories: One Tearl.ab Reader, Two TearLab Pens, Two TearLab Electronic Check Cards, Sinqle Use TearLab Osmolarity Test Cards, and TearLab Control Solutions. The TearLab Osmolarity Test Card, in conjunction with the TearLab Osmolarity System, provides a quick and simple method for determining tear osmolarity using nanoliter (nL) volumes of tear fluid collected directly from the eyelid margin. To perform a test, a new Test Card containing a microfluidic capillary channel is attached onto the Pen. The tip of the Test Card is touched to the inferior tear meniscus located above the lower eyelid and collects 40-50 nanoliters of tear fluid by passive capillary action. After a successful collection, the Pen in conjunction with the electrodes embedded on the Test Card, measures and stores the tear fluid impedance. The Pen is then docked to the Reader. The Reader downloads impedance data from the Pen in order to calculate and display the final osmolarity as a numerical value displayed in units of mOsms/L. The TearLab Osmolarity System simplifies the tear collection process by reducing the required specimen volume to nanoliters, eliminating the need to transfer tear fluid and reducing the risk of evaporation. ### Principles of the Procedure The TearLab Osmolarity test utilizes an electrical impedance measurement to provide an indirect assessment of osmolarity. After applying a lot-specific calibration curve, osmolarity is calculated and displayed as a quantitative numerical value {2}------------------------------------------------ ### Precision Studies Contrived tear specimens distributed across the clinical range of interest', 275– 400 mOsms/L, were used for performance testing (see Section XIX, Rationale for Use of Contrived Tears during Performance Testing). ### 1. Single Instrument Precision Precisions calculated as defined in CLS/EPS-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods. Tear samples were analyzed over 20 consecutive days | Sample | Average<br>Osmolarity<br>(mOsms/L) | Within Run<br>(SD) | Within Run<br>(CV%) | Total<br>(SD) | Total<br>(CV%) | |----------|------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------|---------------|----------------| | Low | 280 | 3.8 | 1.34% | 5.2 | 1.87% | | Normal | 294 | 5.5 | 1.85% | 7.3 | 2.47% | | Moderate | 316 | 4.5 | 1.41% | 6.6 | 2.08% | | High | 345 | 4.5 | 1.30% | 8.0 | 2.33% | #### 2. Between Instrument Precision One site, five instruments | Sample | Mean<br>Osmolarity | Total<br>(SD) | Total<br>(CV%) | |----------|--------------------|---------------|----------------| | Normal | 296 | 4.9 | 1.64% | | Moderate | 316 | 5.3 | 1.68% | ### 3. Lot-to-Lot Precision One site, three lots | Sample | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | Mean<br>Osmolarity | Total<br>(SD) | Total<br>(CV%) | |----------|-------|-------|-------|--------------------|---------------|----------------| | Low | 279 | 276 | 277 | 277 | 3.8 | 1.39% | | Normal | 295 | 296 | 291 | 294 | 4.9 | 1.65% | | Moderate | 307 | 303 | 301 | 304 | 6.5 | 2.15% | | High | 338 | 326 | 324 | 329 | 7.5 | 2.28% | ### 4. Between Site Precision Three sites, three instruments & four lots | Sample | Average<br>Osmolarity | Total<br>(SD) | Total<br>(CV%) | |----------|-----------------------|---------------|----------------| | Low | 278 | 4.4 | 1.59% | | Normal | 289 | 6.0 | 2.09% | | Moderate | 308 | 6.3 | 2.05% | | High | 336 | 8.8 | 2.61% | {3}------------------------------------------------ ### Internal Method Comparison Seven levels of contrived tear solution, distributed throughout the clinically significant range of osmolarity', were prepared and measured on the predicate Wescor 5520 Vapro® Osmometer and the TearLab Osmolarity System. The Deming regression between the individual Wescor values (x) and individual Tearlab values (y) is shown below. The red dotted line represents a line with a slope of 1.0. | Parameter | Coefficient | Std Error | 95%CI | |-------------------------|--------------------|-----------|------------------| | Intercept | 23.061 | 8.470 | 6.201 to 39.920 | | Slope | 0.9146 | 0.0276 | 0.8597 to 0.9694 | | Concordance coefficient | 0.9588 | | | | Regression Equation | y=0.9146x + 23.061 | | | #### Internal Method Comparison - TearLab vs. Wescor Osmolarity Image /page/3/Figure/5 description: This image is a scatter plot comparing TearLab Osmolarity and Wescor Osmolarity. The x-axis represents Wescor Osmolarity, and the y-axis represents TearLab Osmolarity, both ranging from 260 to 400. A regression line is plotted through the data points, with the equation y = 0.9146x + 23.061 and an R-squared value of 0.9443, indicating a strong positive correlation between the two variables. 18 - Confidential {4}------------------------------------------------ #### External Method Comparison At each of three physician office sites, forty contrived tear specimens across seven levels of the clinically significant range were prepared and measured on the TearLab Osmolarity System. The physician office laboratories did not have access to the Wescor 5520 Vapro® vapor pressure osmometer. Wescor values were determined by an average of 2-3 measurements on each level of osmolarity immediately prior to the beginning of the study. | No. of Manager<br> | ------------------<br><br>A CORPORAL CO | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>AR-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | All and Catalog Company Contractive Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Co | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Separate of Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children Children<br>1 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>-<br>1<br><br>.<br> | -4-4<br>.<br> | Image /page/4/Figure/4 description: This image is a scatter plot comparing TearLab Osmolarity and Wescor Osmolarity. The x-axis represents Wescor Osmolarity, ranging from 260 to 400, while the y-axis represents TearLab Osmolarity, also ranging from 260 to 400. The plot includes a regression line with the equation y = 0.9402x + 12.512 and an R-squared value of 0.9515, indicating a strong positive correlation between the two osmolarity measurements. ### External Method Comparison - TearLab vs. Wescor Osmolarity 19 - Confidential {5}------------------------------------------------ ### Expected Values & Reference Ranqes Reference tear osmolarity values for normal and dry eve disease patients: Normal: 288-331 mOsms/L (90% Cl 288-331, mean 309.9 ± 11.0) Dry Eye Disease: 291-382 mOsms/L (90% Cl 284-392, mean 324 ± 20.8) Osmolarity may differ from left and right eye, and each eye should be tested and assessed to determine which eye represents the higher osmolarity. ### Calibration Data To determine clinical performance for tear film hyperosmolarity in the diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease (DED) a meta-analysis was performed on historical published data for tear osmolarity in samples of normal and dry eye subjects. An osmolarity referent 316 mOsms/L was found to yield sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 92%, and an overall predictive accuracy of 82% for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome. Studies in the meta-analysis used earlier osmolarity devices, not TearLab. Table 1. Performance of Osmolarity in meta-analysis | | Normal | Dry Eye | Total | | | |-------|-------------|-------------|----------|-----|-----| | ≤ 316 | 750 | 192 | 942 | 80% | NPV | | > 316 | 65 | 429 | 494 | 87% | PPV | | Total | 815 | 621 | 1,436 | | | | | Specificity | Sensitivity | Accuracy | | | | | 92% | 69% | 82% | | | [ Lominson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear Film Osmolality: Determination of a Referent for Iny Eve Diacrosis; Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, October 2006; 47(10) 4309-4315] ### Performance on patients with objective signs of dry eye 140 subjects were enrolled in a multicenter study (n = 45 Normal, n = 95 Dry Eye). To qualify as a Dry Eye patient, subjects were required a positive score on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and 2 or more positive indications of Tear Film Breakup Time (TBUT), Schirmer Test, Corneal Staining, Conjunctival Staining, or Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Performance of the TearLab™ Osmolarity System using these selection criteria are shown below in Table 2: Table 2. TearLab Osmolarity Diagnostic Performance for Dry Eye Disease | | Normal | Dry Eye | Total | | | |-------|-------------|-------------|-------|-----|-----| | ≤ 316 | 32 | 34 | 66 | 48% | NPV | | > 316 | 13 | 61 | 74 | 82% | PPV | | Total | 45 | 95 | 140 | | | | | Specificity | Sensitivity | | | | | | 71% | 64% | | | | 20 - Confidential {6}------------------------------------------------ Figure 1. Distribution of Osmolarities in Normal and Dry Eye Disease subjects. Image /page/6/Figure/2 description: The image contains two plots comparing osmolarity in normal eyes versus dry eye disease. The first plot is a scatter plot showing individual osmolarity measurements for normal eyes and eyes with dry eye disease. The average osmolarity for normal eyes is around 309.9 mOsms/L, while the average osmolarity for dry eye disease is around 324.3 mOsms/L. The second plot shows the probability distribution of osmolarity for normal eyes and dry eyes, with normal eyes having a mean of 309.9 ± 11.0 and dry eyes having a mean of 324.3 ± 20.1. ### Substantial Equivalence The intended use of the TearLab Osmolarity System, like the predicate Wescor osmometer, is to measure the osmolarity of body fluid. Although the TearLab System is specifically indicated for use in the measurement of osmolarity of human tears, while the Wescor osmometer is indicated for use more generally in body fluids, the indications for use of the Wescor encompass the indications for use of the TearLab. In addition, compared to the other predicate devices, the TearLab System has similar indications for use in assessing human tears as the predicate Schirmer strips and Touch IgE microassay, which are also indicated for evaluation of human tears. The TearLab Osmolarity System has the same technological characteristics as its predicate devices, and any technological differences between the TearLab and the predicates do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. Performance data demonstrate that the TearLab is as safe and effective as the Predicate Devices. Thus, the TearLab Osmolarity System is substantially equivalent to other leqally marketed tear collection and measurement devices. 1. 275-400 mOsms/L, ref: Tomlinson, A, Khanal, K, Ramaesh, C et al, Diaper et al, Tear Film Osmolarity: Determination of a Referent for Dry Eye Diagnosis. IOVS. 2006;47(10) {7}------------------------------------------------ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three tail feathers, representing the department's commitment to health, human services, and well-being. The eagle is encircled by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" in a circular arrangement. Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850 OcuSense, Inc. c/o Janice M. Hogan Hogan & Hartson LLP 1835 Market St., 29th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 2 2009 llink Re: k083184 Trade/Device Name: TearLab Osmolarity System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1540 Regulation Name: Osmolality test system Regulatory Class: Class I Product Code: OND, JJX Dated: April 23, 2009 Received: April 23, 2009 Dear Ms. Hogan: This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of Mav 14, 2009. We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820). {8}------------------------------------------------ Page - 2 This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (240) 276-0450. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (240) 276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at (240) 276-3464. For more information regarding the reporting of adverse events, please go to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdr/. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html. Sincerely yours. C.H. Courtney C. Harper, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {9}------------------------------------------------ ### Indication for Use 510(k) Number (if known): k083184 Device Name: TearLab™ Osmolarity System Indication For Use: The TearLab Osmolarity System is intended to measure the osmolarity of human tears to aid in the diagnosis of dry eye disease in patients suspected of having dry eye disease, in conjunction with other methods of clinical evaluation. Prescription Use _ X (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart D) And/Or Over the Counter Use (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE; CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety (OIVD) Division Sign Off Division Sign-Off Office of In Vitro'Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety 510(k) K083/84 Page 1 of 1
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%