Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(251 days)
A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn upon the examiner's hands or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Classified by FDA's General and Plastic Surgery Device panel as Class I, 21 CFR 880.6250, Powder-Free Vinyl Patient Examination Glove, 80L YZ, and meets all requirement of ASTM Standard D5250-06.
Here's an analysis of the provided text, focusing on the acceptance criteria and the study used to demonstrate the device meets those criteria:
Device: Zibo Intco Medical Products, Co. Ltd. Powder-free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Yellow Color
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (from ASTM D5250-06 and FDA requirements) | Reported Device Performance (Zibo Intco Medical Products) |
|---|---|
| Physical and Dimensions Testing: | Inspection Level S-2, AQL 2.5 was met. |
| - Tensile Strength (Mpa) - Before Aging | Average 19.2 Mpa |
| - Ultimate Elongations (%) - Before Aging | Average 501% |
| - Tensile Strength (Mpa) - After Aging | Average 16.8 Mpa |
| - Ultimate Elongations (%) - After Aging | Average 472% |
| - Overall Length (Medium Size) | Average over 249mm (Meets predicate's "Substantially equivalent") |
| - Width of Palm (Medium Size) | Average 95mm (Meets predicate's "Substantially equivalent") |
| - Palm Thickness | Average 0.085 mm (Meets predicate's "Substantially equivalent") |
| - Figure Thickness | Average 0.088 mm (Meets predicate's "Substantially equivalent") |
| Key Performance Attributes: | |
| - Residual Powder (per glove) | < 2 mg (according to ASTM D6124-06) |
| - Pinhole Results (AQL) | Less than 2 defective gloves out of 125, AQL 2.5 met (according to ASTM D5151-06) |
| Biocompatibility Testing: | |
| - Primary Skin Irritation | Not an irritant |
| - Dermal Sensitization (Allergic Contact Dermatitis) | Not a sensitizer |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Physical and Dimensions Testing, Pinhole Results: Inspection Level S-2, AQL 2.5 for physical/dimensions and Inspection Level I, AQL 2.5 for the FDA 1000 ml. Water Fill Test (pinhole). The specific number of gloves tested is implicitly defined by these AQL (Acceptable Quality Limit) levels and inspection levels, but the exact sample number isn't stated directly. For pinhole, it specifies "125 pieces gloves" were tested.
- Residual Powder: Not explicitly stated, but performed according to ASTM D6124-06.
- Biocompatibility (Primary Skin Irritation, Skin Sensitization): Not explicitly stated, but testing was conducted.
- Data Provenance: The testing was performed by Zibo Intco Medical Products, Co. Ltd. in China, as per the submitter's identification. The data is retrospective, as it's part of a 510(k) submission showing pre-market testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This type of information is not applicable to this device. The "ground truth" for glove performance characteristics like tensile strength, pinholes, or powder content is established by standardized testing methods (e.g., ASTM standards) and objective measurements, not by expert consensus or clinical interpretation. Biocompatibility testing results (irritation/sensitization) are also objective findings from laboratory tests, not expert interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This is not applicable as the tests performed are objective laboratory measurements, not subjective evaluations requiring adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, a MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices where human readers (e.g., radiologists) interpret images or data, and the AI's impact on their performance is being assessed. This device is a medical glove, which does not involve human interpretation in the same way.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Study Was Done
No, a standalone study (in the context of AI algorithms) was not done. This device is a physical product (medical glove), not an algorithm or AI software. The performance testing focuses on the physical properties and biological compatibility of the glove itself.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established through:
- Standardized Measurement: Adherence to established performance standards defined by ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) such as D5250-06, D6124-06, and D5151-06.
- Laboratory Testing: Objective results from physical, chemical, and biological laboratory tests (e.g., tensile strength, elongation, residual powder measurement, water fill test for pinholes, primary skin irritation test, skin sensitization test).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. This device is a physical product, not a machine learning model or algorithm, so there is no "training set" in the computational sense. The testing performed is to validate the manufacturing process and product characteristics.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(274 days)
A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the hand of healthcare and similar personnel to prevent contamination between healthcare personnel and the patient's body, fluids, waste or environment.
A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn upon the examiner's hands or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner (21CFR 880.6250)
Classified by FDA's General and Plastic Surgery Device panel as Class I, 21 CFR 880.6250, Powder-Free Vinyl Patient Examination Glove, 80LYZ, and meets all requirement of ASTM Standard D5250-06.
The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for "Shandong Zhiyuan Medical Products Co., Ltd. Synthetic Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves -- Powder Free, Yellow Color". This document is for a medical device (examination gloves) and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than an AI-powered diagnostic device from the perspective of an acceptance criteria table.
Therefore, many of the requested categories in the prompt (e.g., sample size for test set, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC study, standalone performance, training set details) are not applicable to this type of device submission. The submission is primarily based on meeting established physical and biological standards for examination gloves.
Here's an analysis of the provided information within the context of the prompt, highlighting what is available and what is not:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Criteria/Standard | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Dimensions & Performance | Conformance to ASTM D5250-06 standard | Fully conforms to ASTM D5250-06 standard. |
| Inspection Level (Physical) | S-2 | |
| AQL (Physical) | 2.5 | |
| Barrier Integrity | FDA 1000 ml. Water Fill Test | Meets requirements |
| AQL (Water Fill Test) | 2.5 | |
| Inspection Level (Water Fill Test) | I | |
| Biocompatibility | Primary Skin Irritation | No primary skin irritant reactions |
| Skin Sensitization (Allergic Contact Dermatitis) | No sensitization reactions | |
| Powder-Free Claim | Powder content | Contains no more than 2 mg powder per glove |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a single "test set" sample size. The document refers to "samplings" for the FDA 1000 ml Water Fill Test and for physical/dimensions testing, indicating that batches of gloves were tested according to AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards. AQL 2.5 usually implies a sampling plan where a certain number of gloves are inspected from each lot based on lot size, and if the number of defects exceeds a pre-defined limit, the lot is rejected.
- Data Provenance: The testing was conducted by Shandong Zhiyuan Medical Products Co., Ltd. (China). The data is retrospective in the sense that it was collected from manufactured gloves for the purpose of the 510(k) submission.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
- Not Applicable: This product is a physical medical device (gloves), not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring expert ground truth for image or data interpretation. The "ground truth" is based on objective physical, chemical, and biological test results as per established standards and protocols.
4. Adjudication Method
- Not Applicable: There is no "adjudication method" in the context of expert review for diagnostic output. The tests (e.g., water fill, skin irritation) have defined pass/fail criteria.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- Not Applicable: This is not an AI-powered diagnostic device where human reader improvement with AI assistance would be relevant.
6. Standalone Performance
- Not Applicable: Standalone performance, in the context of an AI algorithm operating without human intervention, is not applicable to an examination glove. The performance evaluation here is about the device itself meeting physical and biological specifications.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Objective Test Results and Standards Conformance: The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by:
- ASTM Standard D5250-06: A consensus standard for vinyl patient examination gloves.
- FDA 1000 ml Water Fill Test: A standardized test for pinhole defects.
- Biocompatibility Testing Protocols: Standardized tests for primary skin irritation and sensitization.
- Gravimetric Analysis: To determine powder content.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not Applicable: There is no "training set" in the AI/machine learning sense for this device. The manufacturing process of gloves does not involve training an algorithm from data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not Applicable: As there is no training set, this question is not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1