Search Results

The UltraConcentrator™ Permeability Hemodialyzer is indicated for use as an ultrafiltrator for the selective removal of undesirable plasma water and small dissolved solutes from blood plasma proteins and formed cellular elements, as may be present in cases of acute hemodilution such as following cardiopulmonary bypass.

The UltraConcentrator Permeability Hemodialyzer is a device that is used to remove plasma water from dilute blood plamsa proteins, increasing the concentration of plasma proteins and formed cellular elements. The UltraConcentrator is constructed of semi-permeable hollow fibers which divide the device into two compartments. An inner pathway for diluted blood perfusate is defined by the inlet and outlet connectors and flow dispersion headers which are connected through the inner lumen of semi-permeable, hollow fiber membranes. Surrounding the hollow fibers is an enclosed, vented compartment for the collection of ultrafiltrate waste water.

When perfusate fluid passes through the inner diameter of the hollow fibers, water and small dissolved solutes can pass through the semi-permeable membrane walls into the annular ultrafiltrate compartment to then be discarded.

The UltraConcentrator may be used manually or it may be used with the UltraConcentrator Processor, a pneumatically driven device that provides automatic processing of the UltraConcentrator.

The UltraConcentrator Permeability Hemodialyzer is not intended for use with direct patient connection, nor is it intended for use as a dialyzer. Although constructed of highly permeable membrane material, the low total membrane surface area of the UltraConcentrator inherently limits the maximum rate of water removal. Neither an ultrafiltration rate monitor nor a controller is necessary.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the UltraConcentrator™ Permeability Hemodialyzer, a conventional hemodialyzer used as an ultrafiltrator. It contains information about the device's specifications, indications for use, contraindications, warnings, and precautions, as well as a comparison to a predicate device.

However, this document does not contain information about acceptance criteria for device performance or a study demonstrating that the device meets such criteria.

The 510(k) submission states that "The UltraConcentrator is technologically substantially equivalent to the predicate in every respect," which is the basis for its clearance, rather than proof through a formal study meeting specific acceptance criteria as might be expected for novel devices or software.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific information points regarding acceptance criteria and a study to prove they are met because those details are not present in the provided document.

To be explicit, the following information is not available in the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance.
2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
3. Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications.
4. Adjudication method for the test set.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study details.
6. Standalone performance study details.
7. Type of ground truth used.
8. Sample size for the training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established.

Ask a specific question about this device