Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K230563

    Validate with FDA (Live)

    Date Cleared
    2023-09-27

    (210 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3510
    Age Range
    All
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticPediatricDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

    1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis:

    2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

    3. correction of functional deformity:

    4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

    The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System implants are for cemented use only.

    Device Description

    The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System is a hinged, constrained cemented total knee system being introduced as a line extension to MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.'s EVOLUTION® Revision knee portfolio. The system is composed of:

    • a femoral component offered in 7 sizes (sizes 2-8) with femoral yoke fixation screw for ● attachment to the yoke assembly
    • a hinge yoke assembly offered in 9 sizes based on femur size (size 2-3, 4-6, and 7-8) and tibial insert thickness (small, medium, large)
    • a yoke extension stop offered in 3 options (0°, 5°, 10°)
    • a tibial insert offered in 8 sizes (sizes 1-8) and in 5 thickness options (12, 14, 17, 20, 24mm)
    • a tibial base offered in two variants:
      • modular (8 sizes, 1-8) with tibia locking screw for attachment to stem extensions o and stem extension adapters
      • monolithic (3 sizes, 1-3) with fixed small keel o
    • . Offset adapters (2 sizes, 4mm x 25mm and 8mm x 25mm) and valgus stem adapters (2 sizes, 1° x 25mm and 2° x 25mm)
    • Universal femoral augments
      • distal augments offered in 7 sizes (sizes B-H) in 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20mm o thicknesses
      • posterior femoral augments in 7 sizes (sizes B-H) in 4, 8, and 12mm thicknesses, O
    • Medial and lateral tibial augments offered in 8 sizes (sizes 1-8) in 5, 10, and 15mm thicknesses

    Components are manufactured from cobalt chrome alloy, titanium alloy, UHMWPE and crosslinked UHMWPE, and PEEK conforming to ASTM F75, F1537 - Alloy 1, F136, F648, F2026, respectively.

    The system includes new and existing instrumentation from K140735, K162026, and K171389 to facilitate device implantation.

    The subject femoral offset adapters and femoral valgus adapters are not for use with the EVOLUTION® Hinge tibial bases. The subject system is compatible with previously cleared stem extensions, stem extension adapters, and modular keels cleared in K162026 and patellae from K953439 and K122218. Furthermore, the subject universal femoral augments introduced in this 510(k) are backwards compatible with the EVOLUTION® Femurs cleared in K142550, K171389, and K182125.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets acceptance criteria. The document is an FDA 510(k) premarket notification for a knee system, primarily discussing its substantial equivalence to previously marketed devices based on non-clinical testing, design features, and materials.

    It explicitly states:

    • "Clinical data were not provided for the subject device." (Page 7, Section E. Clinical Testing)

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information, which includes:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
    3. Number of experts used and their qualifications for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set.
    5. Results of a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study.
    6. Results of a standalone (algorithm only) performance study.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    This document focuses on mechanical and material testing, and substantial equivalence, not a clinical study involving an AI or diagnostic device with acceptance criteria for performance metrics like sensitivity or specificity.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1