Search Results

The True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter is indicated for balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

The True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter is an over-the-wire co-axial catheter with a balloon fixed at the tip. The balloon enables continuous hemodynamic flow through its central orifice. The catheter is 110 cm long and has two lumens: one lumen is used to inflate and deflate the balloon and the other permits the use of a guidewire to position the catheter. The balloon inflation luer-lock hub (angled) connects to a syringe inflation device to deliver radiopaque contrast media for inflation. The guidewire luerlock hub (straight) connects to the guidewire lumen. The balloon is non-compliant and is designed to reach a known diameter and length when inflated within the specified pressure range. Two radiopaque markers are located on the guidewire lumen. These bands are positioned at the proximal and distal balloon shoulders. These markers are provided for fluoroscopic positioning of the device across the aortic valve. Balloon catheter dimensions, nominal pressure, maximum inflation pressure, recommended introducer size, and maximum quidewire size are indicated on the package label.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device, the True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter. It details the device's characteristics, intended use, and comparison to a predicate device to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

However, the document does not describe an AI/machine learning device or a study involving human readers or expert consensus on medical images. The "performance data" section (page 6) lists in vitro tests conducted on the physical catheter and its components (e.g., balloon diameter, catheter shaft length, burst pressure, biocompatibility tests). These are engineering performance criteria for a physical medical device, not AI model performance.

Therefore, many of the requested elements for an AI device's acceptance criteria and study proving its performance (e.g., sample size for test set, adjudication method, MRMC study, training set details) cannot be extracted from this document because it is not about an AI device.

Here's an attempt to address the parts that are applicable to this document, with a strong disclaimer that it is not an AI device:

Device: True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter

Type of Device: Physical medical device (catheter for balloon aortic valvuloplasty), NOT an AI/machine learning device.

Study Purpose (as described): To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject device to a predicate device by evaluating its technological characteristics and performance criteria through in vitro testing.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document lists performance tests but does not provide a quantitative table of acceptance criteria and reported numerical performance values. It broadly states that the device "met all predetermined acceptance criteria of design verification and validation as specified by applicable standards, guidance, test protocols and/or customer inputs."

Below is a list of the types of performance criteria and tests mentioned, but no specific numerical values or pass/fail thresholds are provided in this document.

Regarding AI-specific criteria (not applicable to this document):

2. Sample sizes for test set and data provenance: Not applicable. The document describes in vitro engineering tests, not a dataset for an AI model.
3. Number of experts and qualifications for ground truth: Not applicable. Ground truth for an AI model (e.g., image annotations) is not relevant for a physical medical device.
4. Adjudication method: Not applicable.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable. This study focuses on the physical performance of a catheter, not on the impact of AI assistance on human readers.
6. Standalone (algorithm-only) performance: Not applicable. There is no algorithm.
7. Type of ground truth used: For this device, the "ground truth" for performance is established through physical measurements, engineering specifications, and established biocompatibility testing standards. It's not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the context of diagnostic AI.
8. Sample size for training set: Not applicable. There is no AI model that requires a training set.
9. How ground truth for training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device