Search Results

The Intravascular Administration Set is a single use, sterile, non-pyrogenic device which provides access for the administration of fluids from a container's vascular system through the administration set's needle or catheter (which is inserted into a vein).

The Intravascular Administration Set is a single use, sterile, non-pyrogenic device which provides access for the administration of fluids from a container's vascular system through the administration set's needle or catheter (which is inserted into a vein). Each set will be manufactured to unique specifications using dimensions, components and configurations specified by the customer. Standard sets will also be offered. Components used in the IV sets may be either manufactured by ICU Medical or purchased from other manufacturers. Components will be assembled into configurations specified by the customer and packaged.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for an Intravascular Administration Set from ICU Medical Inc. It describes the device, its intended use, and compares it to predicate devices. However, this document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, particularly not in the context of an AI-powered medical device.

The questions you've asked (about sample sizes, experts, ground truth, MRMC studies, etc.) are highly relevant to the evaluation of AI/ML-based medical devices, which typically undergo rigorous performance studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. The document provided describes a traditional medical device (an IV administration set), which is evaluated based on its physical characteristics, materials, intended use, and equivalence to existing devices, often through bench testing, biocompatibility testing, and sterilization validation, rather than the type of performance study you're inquiring about.

Therefore, I cannot answer your specific questions based on the provided text. The document does not describe:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to AI/ML.
2. Sample sizes for a test set or data provenance for any performance study.
3. Number or qualifications of experts used to establish ground truth.
4. Adjudication methods.
5. Whether a MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done or effect sizes.
6. Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
7. The type of ground truth used (e.g., expert consensus, pathology).
8. Sample size for a training set.
9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

To answer these questions, you would need documentation related to the performance evaluation of an AI/ML-based medical device, which is not what this 510(k) summary for an Intravascular Administration Set details.

Ask a specific question about this device