Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K953606

    Validate with FDA (Live)

    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-03-22

    (233 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1155
    Age Range
    All
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticPediatricDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Home pregnancy test kits can now be purchased from most drug stores without a prescription.

    Device Description

    One step Best midstream presnancy test kids detect pregnancy by an immunologically reaction. The antibodies are affinity purified Goat anti mouse IgG, affinity purified polyclonal antibody to HCG and affinity purified monoclonal antibody to HCG.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text in the context of acceptance criteria and study design, structured to address your specific points:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Accuracy (Pregnant women)100%
    Cross-reactivity with LH (at <200 mIU/ml)Negative
    Substantial Equivalence to "Be sure" one step midstream pregnancy test kits (FDA-approved)Performance "very similar"

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set in the accuracy study or for the comparison with the "Be sure" kit. It only mentions "laboratory test" for the 100% accuracy claim.

    The data provenance is not explicitly stated (e.g., country of origin). It's implied to be retrospective as it refers to a "laboratory test" and a comparison of existing data.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the document. The text does not mention the involvement of experts in establishing the ground truth for the accuracy or cross-reactivity tests.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided in the document. No adjudication method is described.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    There is no indication of an MRMC comparative effectiveness study in the provided text. This device is a standalone diagnostic kit, not an AI-assisted tool for human readers.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Yes, this device is inherently a standalone diagnostic. The reported performance (100% accuracy, negative cross-reactivity) is for the device operating independently without human interpretation beyond reading the visual result.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The type of ground truth used is implied to be:

    • Actual pregnancy status (for the 100% accuracy claim) – presumably confirmed by clinical means, though not specified.
    • Known LH levels (for the cross-reactivity claim).

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable as this is not an AI/machine learning device. The document describes a traditional immunoassay.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    This information is not applicable as this is not an AI/machine learning device with a training set. The "ground truth" for the device's design and validation would stem from established medical understanding of HCG and LH levels in relation to pregnancy.


    Critique and Missing Information Based on the Request:

    The provided text offers very limited detail about the study methodology. For a comprehensive understanding of the device's validation and to meet the detailed requirements of your request, much more information would be needed, specifically regarding:

    • Specific sample sizes for all reported tests (accuracy, cross-reactivity, and comparison).
    • Demographics and characteristics of the test population(s).
    • Exact methodology of the "laboratory test" that yielded 100% accuracy.
    • How actual pregnancy status was confirmed (the "ground truth").
    • Details of the comparison study with the "Be sure" kit (e.g., sample size, specific metrics used to determine "very similar" performance).
    • Any adverse events or limitations identified during testing.
    • Statistical methods used to determine significance and similarity.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1