Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(170 days)
The RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System is indicated for treatment planning and precise delivery of image-guided radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, or stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors or other targeted tissues anywhere in the body when radiation treatment is indicated while minimizing the delivery of radiation to vital healthy tissue. The megavoltage X-ray radiation is delivered in a rotational, modulated, image-guided format in accordance with the physician-approved plan.
The RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System is also indicated for FDG-guided treatment which includes modeling, planning and precise delivery of FDG-guided radiation therapy, a type of Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT), in five or fewer fractions for adults. It is indicated for tumor volumes in lung and bone subject to potential motion and positional uncertainty that have each been assessed with on-board PET/CT prior to delivery for adequate localization, sufficient FDG metabolic activity, local contrast and consistent biodistribution to meet the RMRS requirements, while minimizing the delivery of radiation to vital healthy tissue. BgRT involves the detection of signals from F18 during active beam delivery as a guide to deliver megavoltage X-ray radiotherapy in a rotational, modulated format in accordance with a physician approved treatment plan.
For complete fludeoxyglucose F18 prescribing information, refer both to the current medical imaging agent labeling and to this device labeling under "FDG Medical Imaging Agent Information".
The RefleXion X2 System is a hybrid imaging and treatment platform designed to deliver multiple forms of external beam radiation therapy, including Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy (SBRT), Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT), Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), and biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT).
The subject device (X2 System) is based on the same fundamental design as the X1 System (predicate device, DEN220014). Both systems integrate radiation delivery, imaging (CT and PET), and treatment planning capabilities into a single device.
- 6 MV photon radiotherapy delivery
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging
- Kilovoltage (kV) X-ray CT imaging
- Treatment planning
The radiation delivery subsystem includes a LINAC mounted within the therapy plane, utilizing a fixed primary collimator, adjustable upper and lower jaws, and a multileaf collimator (MLC) to shape and modulate the treatment beam. PET detector arcs are also mounted within the therapy plane to detect emissions from radiotracers during treatment, enabling biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT). The kVCT imaging subsystem operates in a separate imaging plane and provides anatomical imaging for patient setup and verification prior to treatment delivery.
The X2 System incorporates several design updates relative to the X1 System, including enhancements to the PET subsystem, updates to kVCT components, hardware improvements aimed at manufacturing reliability and serviceability, software infrastructure upgrades, usability enhancements such as intrafraction PET image viewing and multi-target treatment workflows, and cybersecurity improvements. These changes do not alter the device's intended use, fundamental scientific technology, or safety and effectiveness.
No new patient-contacting materials, contamination pathways, or reprocessing requirements have been introduced. Consequently, the risk profile of the device, including the risk of infection or other adverse events, remains unchanged from the predicate device.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(332 days)
The RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System is indicated for treatment planning and precise delivery of image-guided radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, or stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors or other targeted tissues anywhere in the body when radiation treatment is indicated, while minimizing the delivery of radiation to vital healthy tissue. The megavoltage X-ray radiation is delivered in a rotational, modulated, image-guided format in accordance with the physician approved plan.
The RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System (RMRS), a hybrid imaging-therapy system, is capable of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) utilizing an on-board kilovoltage CT (kVCT) system for patient localization and field sizes based on jaws which are 40 cm wide, with slice width choices of 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm to optimize patient treatment. It is also equipped with a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) used to create intensity modulated radiation fields at a source-axis distance of 85 cm. It can achieve a nominal dose rate of 850 cGy/min.
The RMRS consists of the following clinical subsystems: 6 MV photon radiotherapy delivery, Kilovoltage (KV) X-ray CT imaging, MV X-ray detection, and treatment planning. The LINAC along with the fixed primary collimator, adjustable collimators, and multileaf collimator (MLC) mount in the therapy plane. The kVCT imaging plane is separate from the therapy plane and provides images used to localize the patient prior to treatment. Additionally, the system is designed architecturally to include PET imaging components for future product enhancements. Although the PET subsystem hardware is present in the system, its functionality is currently disabled.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information provided in the document:
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Performance Test | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Coincidence of mechanical and radiation isocenter | ≤ 1mm | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| kVCT imaging to MV treatment plane localization accuracy | ≤ 1mm | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| kVCT geometric accuracy | ≤ 1mm | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| Dosimetric accuracy | >90% of points passing 3%/3mm (for points greater than 10% maximum dose) | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| Dose rate output constancy | ≤ 2% | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| Dose output linearity | ± 2% ≥5MU; ± 5% (2-4 MU) | Conformance to applicable requirements and specifications |
| High contrast spatial resolution (kVCT) | Not explicitly stated as a pass/fail criterion, but a target is implied. | 4 lp/cm (Predicate: 3 lp/cm) |
| Low contrast resolution (kVCT) | Not explicitly stated as a pass/fail criterion, but a target is implied. | Visibility of 5 mm object for 1% contrast (Predicate: 2% density for 2 cm object) |
Notes: The document states that "Results of bench testing showed conformance to applicable requirements and specifications" for all listed performance tests. While specific numerical results are provided for high and low contrast resolution, they are presented as comparisons to the predicate device rather than explicit acceptance criteria and direct performance measurements against those criteria. However, the implicit indication is that these improved or comparable values meet expectations.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document states, "No animal studies or clinical tests have been included with this pre-market submission." This indicates that the testing was primarily bench testing and in-vitro verification and validation. Therefore, the concept of a "test set" with "data provenance" in the clinical sense (e.g., patient data from a specific country, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable here.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. As per point 2, no clinical test set was used that would require expert-established ground truth. The "ground truth" for the performance tests would be established through a combination of:
- Physical phantoms and measurement devices: For tests like dosimetric accuracy, isocenter coincidence, and geometric accuracy.
- Standards and specifications: The acceptance criteria themselves are drawn from industry standards and internal design specifications.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring expert adjudication was used.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. The RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System is a radiation treatment and imaging system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretation tool for human readers. There is no mention of such a human reader study.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was Done
The performance data presented in the table are for the standalone device performance (e.g., mechanical accuracy, dosimetric accuracy, imaging performance). The device's treatment planning software is part of the system, and its accuracy is tested (e.g., "Treatment Planning System Dose accuracy tests"), indicating a standalone assessment of the algorithm's output. These results are implied to be "conforming to applicable requirements and specifications."
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for the verification and validation tests was established through:
- Physical measurements and industry standards: For mechanical, dosimetric, and imaging performance tests (e.g., phantoms, dosimeters, rulers, calibrated test equipment against known values).
- Design specifications and requirements: The device's performance was measured against its predefined technical specifications and relevant international standards (e.g., IEC standards).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. The document describes a medical device (a linear accelerator and its associated systems) and its performance, not a machine learning or AI model that requires a "training set" in the context of data-driven algorithm development. While the system undoubtedly has complex software, the document focuses on its overall and component performance validation rather than the training of a predictive model.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" discussed in this submission.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1